July 30, 2004

MR. WHIPLASH TRAPPED IN THE BACKLASH:

The lame protests of the Democratic Convention (Dahlia Lithwick, July 29, 2004, Slate)

It's taken a day, but people are starting to admit that Edwards may not have knocked it out of the park yesterday, despite the fawning headlines from this morning. With some embarrassment, we begin to confess to one another that he just didn't do it for us. Last night, Edwards was like someone John Kerry had just rescued from Dawson's Creek. Gorgeous and eloquent and can segue from joy to pain in 60 seconds. But I simply didn't buy it last night, much as I wanted to.

Only caught a bit of it, but Joe Scarborough was on Hardball pointing out how badly Senator Kerry had delivered his speech and the flock of Democratic flacks--Howard Fineman, Chris Matthews, maybe Andrea Mitchell?--angrily shouted him down and told him the content mattered not the delivery (though it's hard to see why that's an argument in favor of the speech). By Sunday all of them will be panning the speech more fiercely than Mr. Scarborough did.


MORE:
Kerry Speech Leaves Out Protest Role (CALVIN WOODWARD, 7/30/04, Associated Press)

John Kerry skipped past his role in the Vietnam protest movement that brought him to prominence when he talked of his younger days fighting for his country and ignored that conflict when praising the American tradition of going to war only "because we have to."

Kerry once famously called the Vietnam War "the biggest nothing in history," and says he is still proud of his anti-war activism when he came back. But in the text of his televised speech at the Democratic National Convention, he emphasized his war record and offered mere clues to his protesting past.

A video introduction shown at the convention before the broadcast networks began carrying his speech included a clip of the young Kerry, in military garb, testifying to Congress against the war in 1971.

And his speech made passing reference to his generation's marches for "civil rights, for voting rights, for the environment, for women, and for peace."

Kerry short-handed a few telling policy details in other parts of his speech.

He declared, for example, that "we value health care that's affordable and accessible for all Americans" and called that care "a right for all Americans."

But his plan, while aimed at expanding coverage and reducing premiums, does not ensure coverage for all. His campaign says the plan would extend coverage to an additional 27 million people, which would leave more than 10 million without health insurance.

He rhetorically asked, "What does it mean when 25 percent of the children in Harlem have asthma because of air pollution? America can do better. And help is on the way."

A study by Harlem Hospital Center last year found 25 percent of the children in a 24-block area of Harlem had the disease. But blaming all of that on air pollution as part of a case against the Bush administration is not supported by the study.

Apart from genetic factors, the study found that the asthmatic children were about 50 percent more likely to live with a smoker. Pollen, dust, animal dander, cockroaches and cold air were thought to be among the contributing causes, along with urban air pollution.

On equipping the military, he said, "You don't value families if you force them to take up a collection to buy body armor for a son or daughter in the service." He's had a long-running dustup with Republicans who criticize him for voting against an $87 billion package for Iraq and Afghanistan that included money for thousands of extra sets of body armor.

Posted by Orrin Judd at July 30, 2004 3:12 PM
Comments

Judging from the small sample of the speech I actually saw Kerry simply hit upon all the talking points that the Left has been using for the last 3 years. Except this time it was done in a long and painfully boring speech by a man with disturbing wrinkles on his face and a phony smile that I was forced to witness no fewer than 50 times while trying to watch a Yankees-Red Sox game on Sunday night. Blah blah blah Ashcroft, blah blah blah Enron. He has no accomplishments from his two decades as a Senator to talk about, and he apparently has no core principles or unifying themes that he can rely on. All he has left is the bare minimum of any presidential candidacy. Talk about what's going on in the world at the moment, blame it on the incumbent or opposite party and then say that you can do it better. Avoid mentioning any specifics and just hope that nobody notices.

Posted by: andy at July 30, 2004 5:04 PM

Kerry looked like a lawyer in a hot courtroom, trying to defend someone whom the jury has already decided is guilty.

Good comment about the media herd: once they see it is OK to dump on Kerry for such a dated speech, they will pile on. Bush's talk in MO today was light-years ahead of Kerry, and that was just a stump speech.

Posted by: jim hamlen at July 30, 2004 8:20 PM

In a related note, Tradesports.com contract on the re-election of Bush was around 48.5 at the beginning of the Dem convention, and is now at 51.2, and looking like its going up. Not much of a bounce, if any at all.

Posted by: jd watson at July 30, 2004 10:00 PM
« OUR GEOCENTRIC UNIVERSE: | Main | THE FIX REALLY WAS IN!: »