July 16, 2004
FLAKKING THE MAU-MAUERS:
NAACP Hasn't Advanced Anything in a Long Time: Why should Bush speak to a hostile group that has outlived its usefulness? (John H. McWhorter, July 15, 2004, LA Times)
Last week, for the fourth year in a row, President Bush declined the NAACP's invitation to speak at its annual convention. Predictably, NAACP President Kweisi Mfume railed that the Bush administration failed to recognize the nation's oldest and largest civil rights group as being significant or important in any way.The sad thing is, the Bush administration's attitude toward the group is justified.
The NAACP is stuck in a mind-set that worked 30 years ago but makes little sense today. Mfume and NAACP Chairman Julian Bond boast that the organization is committed to "speaking truth to power," continuing the whistle-blowing tradition that the organization was founded upon in 1909. This was urgent in an America where lynching was commonplace and segregation was legal.
But almost a century later, black America's main problem is neither overt racism nor more subtle "societal" racism. Lifting blacks up is no longer a matter of getting whites off our necks. We are faced, rather, with the mundane tasks of teaching those "left behind" after the civil rights victory how to succeed in a complex society — one in which there will never be a second civil rights revolution.
The problem would still seem to be racism, but it's the racism of black leadership that asks nothing of and promises everything to blacks. Posted by Orrin Judd at July 16, 2004 7:44 AM
Change the "P" in NAACP from "people" to "politicians" and you have the answer for the group's motives for the past quarter-century.
Posted by: John at July 16, 2004 8:14 AMJohn:
Actually, blacks have always substituted "Certain" for "Colored"
Posted by: oj at July 16, 2004 9:37 AMThey don't even promise anything anymore - they just bray like jackasses.
I have watched a number of 'prominent' black politicians over the years - Andrew Young, Wilson Goode, Bill Campbell, Julian Bond, Kweisi, Jesse, etc. - no matter how pure they were when they started, they became corrupt and indifferent to the people they claimed to serve. Charlie Rangel may be another loudmouth, but he has more on the ball than these losers.
Posted by: jim hamlen at July 16, 2004 12:17 PMI saw him and a NAACP rep on John Gibson yesterday.
They both talked over each other. Gibson tried to get a word in edgewise.
Posted by: Sandy P at July 16, 2004 1:45 PM