July 10, 2004

AS CHAMBERS OUTED HISS (via Kevin Patrick):

Plame's Input Is Cited on Niger Mission: Report Disputes Wilson's Claims on Trip, Wife's Role (Susan Schmidt, July 10, 2004, Washington Post)

Former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, dispatched by the CIA in February 2002 to investigate reports that Iraq sought to reconstitute its nuclear weapons program with uranium from Africa, was specifically recommended for the mission by his wife, a CIA employee, contrary to what he has said publicly.

Wilson last year launched a public firestorm with his accusations that the administration had manipulated intelligence to build a case for war. He has said that his trip to Niger should have laid to rest any notion that Iraq sought uranium there and has said his findings were ignored by the White House.

Wilson's assertions -- both about what he found in Niger and what the Bush administration did with the information -- were undermined yesterday in a bipartisan Senate intelligence committee report.

The panel found that Wilson's report, rather than debunking intelligence about purported uranium sales to Iraq, as he has said, bolstered the case for most intelligence analysts. [...]

The report turns a harsh spotlight on what Wilson has said about his role in gathering prewar intelligence, most pointedly by asserting that his wife, CIA employee Valerie Plame, recommended him.

Plame's role could be significant in an ongoing investigation into whether a crime was committed when her name and employment were disclosed to reporters last summer.

Administration officials told columnist Robert D. Novak then that Wilson, a partisan critic of Bush's foreign policy, was sent to Niger at the suggestion of Plame, who worked in the nonproliferation unit at CIA. The disclosure of Plame's identity, which was classified, led to an investigation into who leaked her name.

The report may bolster the rationale that administration officials provided the information not to intentionally expose an undercover CIA employee, but to call into question Wilson's bona fides as an investigator into trafficking of weapons of mass destruction. To charge anyone with a crime, prosecutors need evidence that exposure of a covert officer was intentional.

We eagerly await all of the apologies that will surely be forthcoming from pundits and politicos who were duped by the Palmes and gamed by the CIA. Rather than investigating patriotic members of the Administration who were simply defending the national security, Justice should be looking into treason charges against the treacherous couple.

Posted by Orrin Judd at July 10, 2004 2:40 PM

Well, duh. No one seriously believed that Wilson just "happened" to be picked for the job by the CIA, did they?

Posted by: Timothy at July 10, 2004 2:47 PM

Don't hold your breath, Orrin, waiting for those apologies. As evidenced by the commenters in Kevin Drum's weblog, the Left has already dismissed this since it was reported by Susan Schmidt, who is considered to be a GOP writer.

See, the facts are not important to the Left, it's who's doing the reporting and their feelings ...

Posted by: Steve White at July 10, 2004 2:49 PM

Does anyone really think the liberal media would report anything of a derogatory nature about one of their 'chosen'ones? There opinions never seem to be controlled by the facts or the truth.

Posted by: William Butler at July 10, 2004 3:33 PM

Steve White is on the target--no Lefty lackwits would ever admit the truth if it conflicted with their attack strategies. The only goal of people like Drum, dailykos, atrios, Sen. Splash Kennedy, Pelosi, et al., is to see our troops killed and our nation defeated. Traitors, pure and simple. Most people on the right are shying away from ingesting the truth about the left, but eventually they may be forced to.

Posted by: John Cunningham at July 11, 2004 3:50 AM

Time to start checking if Valerie Plame was in Prague during April of 2000.

Posted by: jim hamlen at July 11, 2004 11:23 AM