July 13, 2004
50-0 FILES:
Give Me a D?: Reporters analyzing the election sound more like Kerry cheerleaders. (BRENDAN MINITER, July 13, 2004, Wall Street Journal)
[T]here is mounting evidence that Republicans are successfully making inroads with Hispanics across the country. On several issues--education, religion, taxes--Hispanics naturally find themselves in line with the GOP. The No Child Left Behind Act resonates in the Hispanic community because fewer Latinos between 19-25 have a high school diploma (73%) than blacks (89%) or whites (93%). President Bush won 35% of the Hispanic vote in 2000 (near the 1984 Republican record of 37%), and the Bush campaign can reasonably hope to reach 40% this year.The Economist quotes Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico, a Democrat and the son of a Mexican immigrant: "The problem with Democrats is that sometimes they take our people for granted." New Mexico's population is 43% Hispanic, and Mr. Gore won the state by only 366 votes. Hispanics are also key voters in Iowa, Nevada, Oregon and Washington state--all close states last time out.
In Pennsylvania--another state Mr. Gore won narrowly--Mr. Kerry's problem may prove to be his insistence on raising taxes--or, as he puts it, "repealing" Mr. Bush's tax cuts for the "wealthy." Gov. Ed Rendell, a Democrat, these days looks more like a supply-sider than a tax-and-spend liberal. Since his election two years ago, he hasn't resorted to class warfare policies, à la Kerry-Edwards, to revive the economy. Instead of looking to soak the rich, Mr. Rendell increased income taxes only slightly--being careful to keep Pennsylvania competitive with neighboring New York and New Jersey--and is now in the process of cutting property taxes. He has also been working hard to persuade businesses to relocate to Pennsylvania by arguing that it will remain a tax-friendly state.
Although Maryland isn't seen as competitive, national Democrats might want to take a look at the Old Line State. This is a blue state that is starting to blush a little red. Republican Robert Ehrlich defeated Kathleen Kennedy Townsend for the governor's mansion two years ago, partly on a limited-tax platform. And earlier this year the tax-and-spend wing of the Democratic Party tried rolling out a tax increase modeled after Mr. Kerry's proposals. The plan was to close a projected state budget gap by increasing income taxes on the "wealthy." Democratic legislators retreated under pressure, however, and then abandoned plans to reconvene this summer to try again when it became clear that the growing economy would bring in enough taxes to all but erase the deficit. Given this recent history, on election night look for Mr. Bush to do surprisingly well in Maryland.
None of this is to say that Mr. Bush can count on easy re-election.
No, that's a function of the economy, not political trends. Posted by Orrin Judd at July 13, 2004 11:38 AM
The problem with Democrats is that sometimes they take our people for granted."
Good for Hispanics if they are figuring that one out. My question is, when are the blacks going to figure that one out?
Posted by: pchuck at July 13, 2004 12:00 PMSurprising that this article did not mention NJ, where the governor just raised taxes by a record amount, and where polling data as of 2 months ago showed Bush even with Kerry. Someone should ask Gov. McGreevy how Bill Bradley and Jim Florio felt after tax increases in NJ.
Posted by: jim hamlen at July 13, 2004 12:33 PMHopefully the media, being so pro-Kerry, are creating an echo chamber for the Dems where they believe they are wowing the public when in fact they are only wowing themselves and don't find out how out of touch they are until the election results roll in.
Posted by: AWW at July 13, 2004 12:58 PMI'm skeptical about the remote possibility of Maryland selecting Bush. Here in Massachusetts we've had Republican governors for as long as anyone cares to remember, yet the state will enthusiastically vote for whatever candidate the Democrats offer up. I've always thought of Massachusetts and Maryland as being very similar. Both are replete with the over-educated and the under-motivated. As the Killington bumper stickers used to say: "Where the affluent meet the effluent."
Posted by: Worff at July 13, 2004 1:04 PMReagan carried them when they were Blue
Posted by: oj at July 13, 2004 2:45 PMRepublicans 'improving' among Latinos means getting thirty percent instead of twenty percent. The open border with Mexico dooms the Republican party to eventual destruction.
No, it "dooms" Republicans to being majority Latino in a generation or two.
Posted by: oj at July 13, 2004 7:57 PMJohn - read the excerpt - Bush got 35% of the Hispanic vote in 2000 and 40% or more in 2004 is reasonable. The "emerging democrat majority" theory assumes hispanics are automatically Dem voters - if the GOP is getting 40% or more of these voters that theory falls apart.
Posted by: AWW at July 13, 2004 11:00 PM