June 20, 2004

ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHER:

Because They Could (MAUREEN DOWD, 6/20/04, NY Times)

The Clinton alpha instinct on Monica, fueled by a heady cocktail of testosterone and opportunism, was the same one that led W. into his march of folly with Iraq.

Because she offers no evidence to the contrary, it seems safe to assume that Ms Dowd is so morally obtuse that she is incapable of differentiating between getting fellatio for oneself and winning freedom for 23 million people.

Posted by Orrin Judd at June 20, 2004 4:47 PM
Comments

Hasn't she won a Pulitzer? No one would ever give me an award for my writing, but if they ever tried to give me one of those things, I would sue them for libel.

Between MoDo and Duranty, winning the Pulitzer must be as insulting as winning the Nobel Peace Prize.

Posted by: NKR at June 20, 2004 6:20 PM

It's particularly hilarious to see run-of-the-mill Boomer narcissists like Modo try to explain that uber-Boomer-narcissist Clinton by invoking the Evil God Testosterone. What the hell are they going to do for copy when Hillary becomes President?

Posted by: joe shropshire at June 20, 2004 6:33 PM

People like Dowd have a hard time understanding a Bush, and make excuses for a Clinton, because they assume that everyone is like themselves-- obsessed with and solely motivated by sex. It's part of their perpetual adolescence.

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at June 20, 2004 6:47 PM

It seems a bit obvious that she wishes she had been with Clinton in the Oval Office. And she might even think that her presence there would have dissuaded President Bush from his decision on Iraq. A pathetic woman all the way around.

Posted by: jim hamlen at June 20, 2004 9:36 PM

Orrin, it's time to admit it. You're publishing those satirical pieces under Ms Dowd's name.

Posted by: Peter at June 21, 2004 3:49 AM

She aims to shock.

And so the effect is all; the so-called cause can be manipulated, distorted, created. The wilder the conceit, the more extravagant the metaphor, the better the effect.

But her conceits lack all judgment, all sorely weakened by her palplable hatred. So that even as she may be counted, perhaps as one of the brighter, more articulate, members of the species, alas, her utter burgeoning stupidity, once merely unbecoming, has become commonplace.

Yawn.

(Though one wonders if, still, there be strength in numbers.)

Posted by: Barry Meislin at June 21, 2004 3:53 AM

I used to think Molly Ivins was the dumbest of all the (reasonably) famous pundits.. I'm starting to think it's MoDo.

(although Molly is pretty, uh, thick.)

Posted by: JonofAtlanta at June 21, 2004 2:47 PM

I stopped reading Cathy also

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at June 22, 2004 12:21 AM

Well, she said a mouthful this time.

Posted by: genecis at June 22, 2004 8:27 PM
« BEFORE: | Main | WHAT EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION?: »