June 1, 2004

MUCH TO BE BUOYANT ABOUT:

Bush welcomes new government, warns of more violence (PETE YOST, 6/01/04, Associated Press)

"I am confident" that the new Iraqi leadership want the U.S. military to remain, Bush said. "People on the ground...the Iraqis, feel comfortable in asking us to stay."

"The naming of the new interim government brings us one step closer to realizing the dream of millions of Iraqis: a fully sovereign nation with a representative government that protects their rights and serves their needs," Bush said.

Clearly in a buoyant mood, Bush took questions in the Rose Garden for about 30 minutes.

He said the next step is getting approval of a new U.N. Security Council resolution to set conditions under which the interim government will operate and setting up a mechanism for moving toward elections next year.

"I've been speaking with a variety of world leaders, to encourage them to - by telling them we're willing to work with them to achieve language we can live with but, more importantly, language that the Iraqi government can live with," he said.

Bush, who made a surprise visit to U.S. troops in Baghdad on Thanksgiving, said he would like to return for a longer visit - but could not say when Iraq would be a safe enough place to permit such a visit.

He shrugged off some criticism of the United States by Iraq's new president, Ghazi Mashal Ajil al-Yawer, who was named president of the interim government after the Americans' preferred candidate turned down the post.

"Mr. Brahimi put together a government that's going to be, first and foremost, loyal to the Iraqi people. And that's important. It's a government with which I believe we can work," Bush said.


We're a month away from losing interest in the generally successful evolution of Iraq into one of the Middle East's most democratic states, marking just about the only American war in which we fully achieved our goal.

MORE:
New leaders face a skeptical Iraq: The Governing Council dissolved Tuesday as a new Iraqi government, with a mandate through January, was unveiled. (Nicholas Blanford, 6/02/04, CS Monitor)

"They must concentrate on the issues of security, electricity, the economy, and the life of the people," says Saad Jawad, professor of political science at Baghdad University. "They should work hard on these issues, and if they do, they stand a chance of being supported."

The formation of the government was announced after a deadlock over the choice of the president was resolved. Sheikh Ghazi al-Yawar, a US and Saudi-educated businessman and tribal leader, was selected as president after his rival, Adnan Pachachi, an 81-year-old Sunni politician, declined the post.

Although the presidency is largely a ceremonial position, Sheikh Yawar is widely respected among Iraq's Shiite and Kurdish communities as well as his own Sunni constituency. He has been critical of US military policy, and in his first public remarks as president-designate, Sheikh Yawar called on the UN to approve full sovereignty for his country.

"We the Iraqis look forward to being granted full sovereignty through a Security Council resolution to enable us to rebuild a free, independent, democratic, and federal unified homeland," he said.

Posted by Orrin Judd at June 1, 2004 6:16 PM
Comments

The Revolutionary War went pretty well too.

Bush was on his game in this presser.

Posted by: JAB at June 1, 2004 7:13 PM

How well we achieved our goal in regards to the future Iraqi state will not be known for about 10 years. Everything else is premature.

Posted by: Chris Durnell at June 1, 2004 7:44 PM

Chris:

Why? You can give a people a chance to be free. You can't make them be free.

Posted by: oj at June 1, 2004 7:55 PM

There are still a lot of things that can go sour over there -- civil war between two or more of the factions, Sunni Triangle against all comers, another Muqty trying for it, continuing dead-ender terrorist hits, sabotage by Iran, sabotage by their Arab Brothers (TM) who have a vested interest in seeing them fail -- I'd also give about 10 years for everything to settle out, one way or another.

Posted by: Ken at June 1, 2004 8:23 PM

Ken:

Yes, but no one here will be paying any attention by July 4th. When's the last time you saw a story on how Panama is doing since the invasion.

Posted by: oj at June 1, 2004 8:27 PM

Mr. Judd-- one is tempted to respond that that's because Panama is doing quite well since the invasion. Of course, that doesn't entirely explain the lack of Haitian or Liberian news. Or Kosovo, for that matter.
I think we can appreciate that the man put "federal" into that sentence, too. We shall help give them a republic. Let's see if they can keep it.

Posted by: John Thacker at June 1, 2004 9:28 PM

I wouldn't expect the media to completely drop Iraq after June 30, especially if there is any nugget of negative news available. But how much the Amreican people will care if there's a drawdown underway and U.S. forces aren't dying remains to be seen.

If nothing else, it ought to be fun over the next 6-8 weeks watching the editors and the news directors at these outlets trying as hard as they can to keep this story in the forefront if public interest in Iraq drops while resisting the ratings/circulation temptation of playing up the Scott Peterson murder trial and the 10th anniversary of the O.J. affair.

Posted by: John at June 1, 2004 9:45 PM

In what way is "Sunni triangle vs. all comers" a bad situation. To me it's the optimal end state in which the Shia assert themselves against the former Baathists and assorted Jihadi tourists.

Posted by: JAB at June 1, 2004 11:18 PM

I'm down with JAB on that one. The Sunni can either live peacefully as a minority in a Shi'a dominated state or should be forced out.

Posted by: oj at June 1, 2004 11:23 PM

In the last 10 days, during which the domestic doom and gloom was at its height, we've locked in a stunning victory in Iraq. The President understands that, which is why he was in such a good mood yesterday.

As for what we'll hear from Iraq for the rest of the year, it'll be like what we hear from Afghanistan. Almost nothing, except when there are American casualties or someone decides to right, wrongly, that the Taliban/Baathists are on the verge of making a comeback.

Posted by: David Cohen at June 2, 2004 7:43 AM

The next boomlet story for the media will be "where does arrogant Bush go now?".

Posted by: jim hamlen at June 2, 2004 10:34 PM
« CAN'T THEY FIND MARTYRS ANYMORE?: | Main | DEATH OF A BIOGRAPHER (via Bryan Francoeur): »