May 28, 2004
WHO'LL CUT THE CONGRESSMAN'S LAWN?:
Immigrants Drain $30 Billion in Cash Annually (Joseph A. D'Agostino, May 28, 2004, Human Events)
"Technological advances in communication and data transfer--and a surge in labor mobility--have fueled enormous growth in remittances," Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Samuel Bodman said at a May 17 conference at which a new study on remittances was released. "Since 1995, annual remittances from the United States have nearly doubled. . . . In recognition of the importance of remittances around the world, the G7 is committed to facilitating remittance transfers and increasing options available to recipients to help them improve their own economic livelihood. This is a top priority issue for this year's G8 Summit to be held in Sea Island, Georgia, next month."The study, based on a survey of 3,800 Latin American immigrants living in the United States conducted by Bendixen & Associates, found that legal and illegal immigrants send a combined $30 billion annually to their home countries. Mexico alone receives $13.3 billion a year. [...]
"It's money flowing out of some of the poorest communities of the United States," said Steve Camarota, research director at the Center for Immigration Studies. Camarota said that statistics on remittances are hard to generate accurately due to the large number of illegal immigrants in the United States and to the "informal banking arrangements" that often serve as conduits for money sent home. He said there was no reliable way of estimating how much of the $30 billion was taxed by the United States and how much went under the radar screen. "It's certainly not being taxed in the way money spent here would be in sales taxes, etc," he said. "Roughly half of what illegals make is on the books and half off."
Asked if remittances were helping poor Latin American countries stay afloat, Camarota replied, "Does it stymie development in the home country? Everyone sees their economic future dependent on immigration to the United States."
"It encourages governments in other countries to push harder and harder for open borders," said Rep. Tom Tancredo (R.-Colo.), chairman of the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus. "They want those funds to keep flowing."
In fact, Georgetown Prof. Manuel Orozco reported in a presentation to the Inter-American Development Bank on Sep. 17, 2002, that Haiti depends on remittances for 24.5% of its GDP, El Salvador for 17%, Nicaragua for 22%, Jamaica for 15%, the Dominican Republic for 10%, and Mexico for 1.7%. Since $30 billion out of Latin America's total remittance receipts of $38 billion come from the United States, these countries are heavily dependent on immigrants to America.
One has to be a spectacular nitwit to think that making those countries poorer would reduce the migration out of them. Posted by Orrin Judd at May 28, 2004 4:25 PM
Before the groans start from the nativists, bear in mind that the same Mexico which receives $13.3 bn billion in remittances, pays a decent fraction of that back to Americans in the form of interest on its foreign and domestic rates. So, not only do they mow oj's lawn, they can help him pay for his retirement. (And they will for sometime because they are on average a low younger than we are.)
Posted by: MG at May 28, 2004 5:24 PMLet's replace foreign aid with remittances!
Posted by: genecis at May 28, 2004 5:42 PMgenecis:
Our foreign aid to those countries is negligible compared to the remittances.
Posted by: oj at May 28, 2004 7:16 PM--Mexico for 1.7%.--
Seems kind of low, I thought remittances are #3 as to what makes up Mexico's GDP.
Posted by: Sandy P at May 28, 2004 7:17 PMThe same Mexico that bans immigration themselves. The reason (ferreted out from the Mexican Consulate by a reporter posing as a potential immigrant): RACE PURITY.
The consular type he spoke to actually said in so many words that immigration "would destroy the purity of The Mexican Race."
Posted by: Ken at May 28, 2004 7:53 PMMexico as Japan? I mean, really!
Sorry for the lapse into Valley-speak.
Posted by: jim hamlen at May 28, 2004 11:05 PM*gapes stupidly* Race purity? In a nation where most of the population is _mixed_ European and Amerind (Aztec, Maya, etc., etc.)???
The Mexicans have a peculiar definition of what constitutes racial purity, meseems.
Posted by: Joe at May 29, 2004 12:21 AM$ 30 billion out of an $ 11 trillion dollar economy is 0.27%.
Not much of a problem.
The best way to re-capture the $ 13 billion flowing to Mexico is to make Mexico the 51st - 60th states.
Since the Mexican economy is only the size of Texas', measured in purchasing power parity, (or roughly 8% of the US' GNP), it won't be as hard to integrate them as it was for the Federal Republic of Germany to absorb East Germany.
Then, once American companies and entrepreneurs work their managerial magic on Mexico's many, many natural and labor resources, the economic contribution from the states formerly known as Mexico could easily triple, turbo-charging the total United States of North America's economic growth for decades.
Plus, we pick up a children-loving culture 105 million strong, which'll help the US get over the Boomer-retirement hump, both in fiscal terms, and nursing-home labor.
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at May 29, 2004 9:02 AM