May 28, 2004
WHO ARE THEY TO PICK THEIR OWN LEADERS...:
U.S., U.N. Blindsided on Iraq PM Announcement (Caren Bohan, 5/28/04, Reuters)
When word surfaced in Baghdad on Friday that Iyad Allawi would lead Iraq's interim government, confusion reigned both in Washington and at the United Nations, despite President Bush's assurances of an orderly handover.For weeks, the Bush administration has described the selection of the interim government as a process that was being spearheaded by U.N. envoy Lakhdar Brahimi in consultation with the United States and Iraqis.
Bush, in a major address on Monday, laid out a step by step plan that he said would lead to Iraqi sovereignty on June 30.
But it was the U.S. appointed-Iraqi Governing Council and an aide to Allawi who first disclosed his selection to the top job in the transitional Iraqi government.
Nearly three hours later Brahimi gave his endorsement to Allawi through a spokesman. It took a full three additional hours for a senior administration official in Baghdad, who spoke on condition of anonymity, to confirm that Allawi would be interim prime minister.
"He will be the prime minister when the interim government is set up in the next two or three days," the official told reporters in a conference telephone call. "We thought he would be an excellent prime minister. ... I think that this is going to work."
For folks who we are assured have no instinct nor desire for self-government they seem to be doing okay.
MORE:
Surprising Choice for Premier of Iraq Reflects U.S. Influence: In the choice of Iyad Alawi for prime minister of Iraq, the United Nations found itself appearing shoved aside by the U.S. (WARREN HOGE and STEVEN R. WEISMAN, 5/29/04, NY Times)
Statements from the United Nations seemingly confirmed the idea that Mr. Brahimi was merely bowing to the wishes of the others.Posted by Orrin Judd at May 28, 2004 7:40 PM"Mr. Brahimi respects the decision and says he can work with this person," Fred Eckhard, the spokesman for Secretary General Kofi Annan, said in response to a barrage of skeptical questioning. Asked what Mr. Annan's view was, Mr. Eckhard said: "The secretary general respects the decision, as I said Mr. Brahimi does. `Respect' is a very carefully chosen word."
Some time later, perhaps because of the skepticism that comment engendered, a less circumspect statement was issued in the name of Ahmad Fawzi, Mr. Brahimi's press spokesman, saying: "Let there be no misunderstanding. Mr. Brahimi is perfectly comfortable with how the process is proceeding thus far."
In a telephone interview from Baghdad, Mr. Brahimi refused to discuss the selection of Dr. Alawi. "I don't want to go back saying who is good and who is bad," he said.
But in a hint that the selection process had not gone exactly as planned, Mr. Brahimi added, "You know, sometimes people think I am a free agent out here, that I have a free hand to do whatever I want." He noted that he had been asked to take on the job in a letter to Mr. Annan from the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq and the Iraqi Governing Council.
So Bush gets criticized if we pull all the strings behind Iraqi governance, and if we let Iraqis self-govern. Got it ...
Posted by: Jeff Brokaw at May 28, 2004 8:49 PMLet's just hope that OJ's note below - that Iraq will be a non-story in a few months - turns out to be true.
Posted by: AWW at May 28, 2004 9:47 PMIf you read Foxnew's account it appears Mr. Allawi was very favorable to the US, and the UK. Didn't mention any confusion as Paul Bremer was present when nomination was made, and in fact congratulated Mr. Allawi. TW
So after all the griping by conservatives that Bush was letting the UN take too much power, it turns out that we did no such thing. Go figure.
Posted by: Timothy at May 29, 2004 12:07 PM