May 28, 2004
WHAT WEAPONS?:
In the Scrapyards of Jordan, Signs of a Looted Iraq: There is increasing evidence that parts of sensitive military equipment, billed as Iraqi scrap metal, are streaming into Jordan. (JAMES GLANZ, 5/28/04, NY Times)
As the United States spends billions of dollars to rebuild Iraq's civil and military infrastructure, there is increasing evidence that parts of sensitive military equipment, seemingly brand-new components for oil rigs and water plants and whole complexes of older buildings are leaving the country on the backs of flatbed trucks.By some estimates, at least 100 semitrailers loaded with what is billed as Iraqi scrap metal are streaming each day into Jordan, just one of six countries that share a border with Iraq.
American officials say sensitive equipment is, in fact, closely monitored and much of the rest that is leaving is legitimate removal and sale from a shattered country. But many experts say that much of what is going on amounts to a vast looting operation.
In the past several months, the International Atomic Energy Agency, based in Vienna, has been closely monitoring satellite photographs of hundreds of military-industrial sites in Iraq. Initial results from that analysis are jarring, said Jacques Baute, director of the agency's Iraq nuclear verification office: entire buildings and complexes of as many as a dozen buildings have been vanishing from the photographs.
"We see sites that have totally been cleaned out," Mr. Baute said.
Isn't it the official NY Times position that there were no sensitive weapons in Iraq? Posted by Orrin Judd at May 28, 2004 8:28 AM
oj, by now you should know that the "debating" bar in the war or words (the only war the Left and the extreme right were ever interesting in waging, since 9/11) has been moved on this issue. It does not matter anymore how many weapons are found, anymore. If a weapon is ever used again, it was because the war created the (apparently, ONLY) opportunity for the bad guys (which does not apparently include Saddam) to get their hands on them. Gotcha, neocon scum.
Posted by: MG at May 28, 2004 8:46 AMGee!! It looks like Hans Blix & the U.N. crowd coulda really taken advantage of some of this sattelite technology. Finding the sensitive sights would have been so much easier. . . .
Posted by: Twn at May 28, 2004 9:06 AMNotice the language:
"The agency started the program in December, after a steel vessel contaminated with uranium, probably an artifact of Saddam Hussein's pre-1991 nuclear program, turned up in a Rotterdam scrapyard."
Posted by: Paul Cella at May 28, 2004 9:43 AM>Isn't it the official NY Times position that
>there were no sensitive weapons in Iraq?
EES PARTY LINE, KOMRADES!
Posted by: Ken at May 28, 2004 12:38 PMOceania has always been at war with East Asia.
And the chocolate ration of TWENTY GRAMS has been INCREASED to TEN GRAMS.
Posted by: Ken at May 28, 2004 8:14 PMSounds like the Times is laying the groundwork for its explanation when something is found that cannot be spun away.
Posted by: jim hamlen at May 28, 2004 11:18 PM