May 22, 2004

THE VIEW TO ETERNITY:

Chapter XVII: HOW, WHEN CONDITIONS ARE EQUAL AND SKEPTICISM IS RIFE, IT IS IMPORTANT TO DIRECT HUMAN ACTIONS TO DISTANT OBJECTS (Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America)

In ages of faith the final aim of life is placed beyond life. The men of those ages, therefore, naturally and almost involuntarily accustom themselves to fix their gaze for many years on some immovable object towards which they are constantly tending, and they learn by insensible degrees to repress a multitude of petty passing desires in order to be the better able to content that great and lasting desire which possesses them. When these same men engage in the affairs of this world, the same habits may be traced in their conduct. They are apt to set up some general and certain aim and end to their actions here below, towards which all their efforts are directed; they do not turn from day to day to chase some novel object of desire, but they have settled designs which they are never weary of pursuing.

This explains why religious nations have so often achieved such lasting results; for while they were thinking only of the other world, they had found out the great secret of success in this. Religions give men a general habit of conducting themselves with a view to eternity; in this respect they are not less useful to happiness in this life than to felicity hereafter, and this is one of their chief political characteristics.


Posted by Orrin Judd at May 22, 2004 7:51 PM
Comments

The question is what fraction of a nation can reject such a mission before it all falls apart? Until you get Manzikert and worse, and then it's the turn of the next nation that cares? Once a people begins to turn away from the "view to eternity" is there any hope that they'll turn back?

Posted by: brian at May 22, 2004 10:32 PM

Interesting observation, as are most of de Tocqueville's

But I don't believe he wrote this with shaheeds in mind.

Posted by: Barry Meislin at May 23, 2004 10:37 AM

What non-religious nations did he have at hand to contrast to the record of the religious ones?

Posted by: Harry Eagar at May 24, 2004 1:44 AM

Harry:

If he saw secular Europe he'd feel well vindicated.

Posted by: oj at May 24, 2004 9:25 PM

He's probably speaking of the French Revolution, but other than that one short-lived regime, what other non-religious nations would DeToqueville have been aware of?

Posted by: Robert Duquette at May 25, 2004 1:37 AM

What others matter, the rest have followed suit. No one's ever seen evolution but y'all buy Darwinism.

Posted by: oj at May 25, 2004 7:49 AM
« THE WAGES OF ANTI-AMERICANISM: | Main | I SAY NO »