May 4, 2004

THE SENATOR FROM COLORADO

Service Winner: Kerry's bio ads build a rags-to-ribbons myth (William Saletan and Jacob Weisberg, Slate, 5/4/04)

Of course, everything I've absorbed about Kerry from these ads is basically false. His dad wasn't an Army guy from the Rocky Mountains. He was a patrician diplomat from the East Coast, who raised his family in suburban Boston; Washington, D.C.; and Europe. John wasn't a scholarship kid at Yale. He was a privileged preppie from St. Paul's. He was opposed to Vietnam before he even went and volunteered partly, as he says, out of an idea service to country but also out of evident political ambition. When he got home, he was an antiwar activist, who threw his own or someone's else's medals or ribbons on the steps of the Capitol. He's not a conservative or even a centrist. In fact, he has a voting record as liberal as that of anyone in the Senate. He and McCain weren't trying to find lost POWs and MIAs in Vietnam. They were trying to prove there weren't any and thereby put the Rambo fantasy to rest. He voted for Clinton's 1993 economic plan, but to say that this act was responsible for creating 20 million jobs is an enormous leap, as is Kerry's contention that he cast the deciding vote (so did 50 other people). His daughter isn't related to his wife, and his wife is a tart-tongued jet-setter worth $500 million.

In other words, these ads are masterpieces of indirection. They paint an almost entirely fictitious portrait of Kerry without saying anything that is explicitly untrue. At the same time, the Bush campaign and the RNC are spending even more money to broadcast ads that create an equally misleading portrait of Kerry as a left-wing opportunist who talks out of both sides of his elitist mouth.

Misleading? Can Weisberg remember only one paragraph at a time?

Posted by David Cohen at May 4, 2004 8:55 PM
Comments

Weisberg already makes the case for elitist and opportunist, especially even questioning why Kerry went to Viet-Nam (only GI Joe with a video camera).

Does he need help understanding why Leftist? How about a voting record more liberal that Teddy. Have Bush ads even mentioned this? As to speaking out of both sides of his mouth, Bush ads have left much unsaid. They have used the Senator's famous "I voted for...before I voted against..."; but where are the two letters to the constituents one in favor and one against the Gulf War? where is the "I voted for Helms-Burton (said in Miami) when he did not? other examples abound.

Posted by: MG at May 4, 2004 9:26 PM

MG: He even makes the case for leftist: He's not a conservative or even a centrist. In fact, he has a voting record as liberal as that of anyone in the Senate.

Posted by: David Cohen at May 4, 2004 10:07 PM

Wasn't it Sam Clemens who once said that the best way to tell a lie was to "tell the truth creatively"? This ad more than meets that criteria.

As for what Bush hasn't said yet-- you don't use all your ammunition in the first month of a campaign, although Kerry seems to be providing them more new ammo than they can use in a ten year campaign.

(And in defense of of Kerry's film career-- my father the Marine master sargent always took an 8mm movie camera along when he got assigned to the 6th Fleet (Med), Okinawa or Viet Nam. Lots of guys did it.)

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at May 4, 2004 10:48 PM

Well if Bush can be the "boy from Midlands"?

Posted by: J.H. at May 5, 2004 8:25 AM

Where's Midlands? Someplace in England?

Posted by: old maltese at May 5, 2004 7:12 PM
« SOONER OR LATER IT BECOMES A TREND: | Main | THE SHAH ALWAYS FALLS: »