May 5, 2004
THE LAST ACCEPTABLE BIGOTRY:
New constraints squeeze churches in Holy Land: Christians' concerns grow amid changes in tax-exempt status and Israel's nonrenewal of workers' visas. (Jane Lampman, 5/04/04, CS Monitor)
Christian churches in the Holy Land are facing an unprecedented crisis that some say is jeopardizing their future, including their capacity to maintain the faith's holy sites and charitable institutions and to educate clergy.The churches' difficulties have been building over the past three years as the Israeli government has failed to renew visas or residence permits for hundreds of religious workers, and has begun sending tax bills to charitable groups that have long had tax-exempt status, some since the Ottoman Empire. At the same time, the separation wall being built in Jerusalem and on the West Bank is slicing through religious facilities, in some cases taking land and blocking pilgrimage routes.
"All indications point to the fact that the church is slowly but surely being strangled," says an official at the Latin Patriarchate, the Roman Catholic Church's regional office in Jerusalem, which serves Israel, the Palestinian territories, Jordan, and Cyprus.
So great is the concern that Vatican diplomats have spoken out bluntly and Americans have sought US help. Bishop Wilton Gregory, president of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, recently sent a letter to President Bush calling this "the most difficult situation in living memory for the Church in the Holy Land."
Israeli officials have said over several months that the visa problem is a bureaucratic issue, requiring new guidelines for security purposes. But to some church officials it looks like a concerted effort to make life difficult for Christians and Christian institutions.The majority of local Christians in the Holy Land are Arabic-speaking. The Catholic church has a different perspective from Israel on the peace process, including its desire for a special status for Jerusalem and the holy sites. Others worry there could be an aim to reduce the overall Christian presence.
"This is tough, tough politics," suggests a religious observer with experience in the region, who asked not to be named.
The Evangelical-Israeli Connection: Scripture Inspires Many Christians to Support Zionism Politically, Financially (Bill Broadway, March 27, 2004, Washington Post)
The much-publicized controversy over Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" might give the impression that Jews and evangelical Christians have little in common, theologically or otherwise. Nothing could be further from the truth.While some evangelical and Jewish leaders sparred publicly for months over the film's depiction of Jesus's last hours, especially its potential to incite anti-Semitism, thousands of evangelicals were donating millions of dollars to support the state of Israel and its people. And Jews, most notably the Israeli government, welcomed their contributions.
"We get 2,000 to 2,500 pieces of mail a day, most of them with checks," said Yechiel Eckstein, president of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, founded 21 years ago to foster better relations between the two religions. Since then, Eckstein, an Orthodox rabbi, has broadened the organization's mission and in the last decade has collected more than $100 million in financial support for Israel. Last year, the fellowship contributed $20 million from a donor base of 365,000 individuals and groups, most -- if not all -- of them evangelical Christians, Eckstein said. About half of the money was used to help Jews relocate to Israel from different parts of the world; the remainder provided food, medical care and other assistance to poor and elderly Jews in Israel, the former Soviet Union and other countries.
On Monday, the fellowship announced a campaign to raise $7.2 million to provide security for the 1,000 highest-risk public bus routes in Israel, including bomb-detection devices and equipment for screening passengers and baggage, and sent a $2 million check to begin the process.
The fellowship, the largest and one of the oldest evangelical organizations providing support for Israel, has been joined in recent years by at least a half-dozen others with such names as Bridges for Peace, Christians for Israel, International Christian Embassy Jerusalem and Chosen People Ministries. Although no one tracks all evangelical contributions to Israel, Eckstein believes the figure could exceed $25 million annually.
Evangelical support for Israel dates to the 19th century, when Christian Zionists called for the return of Jewish exiles to Palestine to fulfill biblical prophecies. If the creation of the state of Israel in 1948 seemed the answer to the Christian Zionists' prayers -- not to mention those of the Jewish people -- the extraordinary victory of Israel in the 1967 Six-Day War seemed to them a sure sign of divine will.
Evangelical leaders such as the Rev. Jerry Falwell began lobbying for greater political support of Israel from the U.S. government and urging financial support from the rapidly growing evangelical movement. And the relationship between evangelical leaders and the Israeli government began to flower, slowly at first because many Israeli leaders hesitated to accept money from people who might want to convert them.
The 1977 election of Likud Party leader Menachem Begin as prime minister marked a new era in evangelical-Israeli relations. Begin was so pleased with Falwell's pro-Israel activities that in 1979 he gave the evangelical leader a Lear jet.
Today, the connection is even stronger. Likud Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has met with evangelical leaders on numerous occasions, most recently in Jerusalem last month to ask their help in countering a rise in anti-Semitic incidents in Europe and other parts of the world.
In January, the Israeli parliament created a Christian Allies Caucus to coordinate activities with its Christian friends. About the same time, former Soviet dissident Natan Sharansky, Israeli minister to the Diaspora and for Jerusalem affairs, met with evangelical leaders at the Peabody Hotel in Memphis to thank them for their "steadfast support for the state of Israel."
Unless Israel thinks it can play off Catholics against Protestants or something this doesn't make any sense. If they're trying to play them it makes little. Posted by Orrin Judd at May 5, 2004 7:30 AM
Begin gave Falwell a Lear Jet?
Posted by: David Cohen at May 5, 2004 9:13 AMAll the more reason to pull the plug on
Israel now!
Perhaps the continuous condemnation of Israel by the Catholic and Orthodox churches, plus their overt support for Arafat and Hamas may have soured their relation with Israel.
Posted by: david at May 5, 2004 9:46 AMI'm a Catholic but on this issue my sympathies are with Israel. Israel (with your support, oj) is trying to build a wall and separate itself from the Palestinians. The churches are trying to keep the communities connected, and want free transit for church members between Palestinian and Israeli areas. Both parties can't succeed.
Posted by: pj at May 5, 2004 12:22 PMAfter experiencing what I call "Anti-Semitic Zionism" in a fringe "splinter church" in the Seventies, I have always been leery of Evangelical Christian support for Israel.
What I experienced was during the Hal Lindsay period of End-Time-Prophecy hysteria. Basically the idea was "Israel has Returned to The Land. This fulfills End-Time Prophecy. Thus Israel Can Do No Wrong. But the Jews are still Christ-killers, and must Convert in the Tribulation or Burn in Hell for Killing Christ." They supported Israel 1000%, but only as a piece in their End Time Prophecy puzzle; they didn't care about the Israelis as people, only as characters in Revelation according to Hal Lindsay.
Thus my description as "Anti-Semitic Zionism". Ever since then, I cannot hear of gung-ho Evangelical support for the Israelis without an alarm going off.
Posted by: Ken at May 5, 2004 12:36 PMKen:
I don't get it. Obviously if you're a Christian then Christ is God's Son and Jews will have to recognize that eventually. It seems no more inflammatory than the Jewish belief that they're the Chosen People.
Posted by: oj at May 5, 2004 12:48 PMLast acceptable bigotry? Get in line.
Posted by: Robert Duquette at May 5, 2004 2:04 PMJH:
So, it's really not the balance of payments that has you concerned.
Posted by: David Cohen at May 5, 2004 6:21 PMKen's assessment from inside matches mine from outside, but it didn't stop in the '70s.
Meanwhile, Muslim killers are purging Lebanon of Christians who have lived and worshipped there since the 1st century, and nobody seems upset about it.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at May 5, 2004 11:26 PMThey should leave.
Posted by: oj at May 5, 2004 11:34 PMThen so should the Israelis
Posted by: Harry Eagar at May 6, 2004 2:08 AMI can't think of any other country with respect to which so many believe they have a proprietary interest in the minutiae of its domestic affairs, not to say its very existence Leaving aside security issues (and I suspect many of those Christian guests are a problem), is it really a huge surprise that Israel feels less than obliged to facilitate the spread of Christianity through foreigners? It may well be in Israel's interests to be a little shrewder here, but that is not what the country is about. They are still miles ahead of the rest of the world on inter-faith tolerance.
Ken:
"they didn't care about the Israelis as people,"
I don't think it is realistic to expect any large population to be motivated by "care" on a general, ongoing basis. Maybe in response to a crisis, but not day-to-day. That is an individual virtue. For instance, on this site David and Raoul regularly demonstrate an ongoing, warm-hearted compassion and concern for Canadians, but I don't expect that from the general U.S. population.
Gotta anchor the support in something deeper or wider or both.
Posted by: Peter B at May 6, 2004 6:00 AMPeter:
They're officially intolerant of even many Jews:
http://www.forward.com/issues/2003/03.05.23/news13.html
Israel is a worthy nation; there's no need to try and whitewash it.
Posted by: oj at May 6, 2004 7:44 AMOrrin:
Who is whitewashing? What obligation does Israel have beyond respecting the freedom of religion of Israeli Christians and ensuring holy sites are maintained? What other country in the world is seen as being obliged to allow in large number of guests for religious or secular or charitable purposes?
And I said inter-faith, not intra-faith.
Posted by: Peter B at May 6, 2004 8:10 AMPeter:
Yes, I meant inter--they consider converts to be non-Jews. It is an effectively closed society. They have no obligation and they are justifiably intolerant.
Posted by: oj at May 6, 2004 8:17 AMOrrin:
C'mon now. We have to agree on what words mean. Questions relating to who qualifies for the Right of Return and who is a Jew are not matters most feel are encompassed in the phrase "inter-faith tolerance".
Posted by: Peter B at May 6, 2004 8:27 AMThen why would relations between Baptists and Catholics be covered?
Posted by: oj at May 6, 2004 8:37 AMOrrin:
Because that is all in the family for us. I wouldn't expect such to be reflected in the official laws and policies of the state of Israel.
Posted by: Peter B at May 6, 2004 8:42 AMBut it is. They define who's a Jew in much the same fashion that Christians fight over which denomination is truly Christian.
Posted by: oj at May 6, 2004 8:57 AMHarry:
Oh you big gooey secularist, always trying to bring warring peoples together to find the reasonable and happy middle.
Orrin:
You've lost me. Isn't this about government immigration and residency policies?
Posted by: Peter B at May 6, 2004 3:53 PMPeter:
I was also to official policies on who's Jewish and who isn't.
Posted by: oj at May 6, 2004 5:38 PMHarry:
Even you think some of your feelings are worth fighting for, no?
Posted by: oj at May 6, 2004 5:40 PMYeah, but not the religious ones.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at May 7, 2004 3:04 PMThey're all religious, just not all Christian.
Posted by: oj at May 7, 2004 3:55 PM