May 8, 2004
TELL OLD PHAROAH:
The Divine Calm of George W. Bush: So Iraq's a mess and half the country hates you. Just keep praying. (Rick Perlstein, May 3rd, 2004, Village Voice)
It's hard to be perturbed when you believe what our president believes. According to Professor Bruce Lincoln, who teaches a seminar on the theology of George W. Bush at the University of Chicago Divinity School, the president "does feel that people are called upon by the Divine to undertake certain positions in the world, and undertake certain actions, and to be responsible for certain things. And he makes, I think, quite clear—explicitly in some contexts, and implicitly in a great many others—that he occupies the office by a Divine calling. That God put him there with a sense of purpose."It has been a topic of some confusion, the meaning of George Bush's religious beliefs. Some commentators trumpet the president's ties to Howard Ahmanson, a fantastically wealthy Californian who is an acolyte of the "Christian Reconstructionist" movement—which aims to place the United States under Biblical law (though Ahmanson proclaims himself personally against, say, the stoning of homosexuals). Others point up his connections to apocalyptic millennialists like Tim LaHaye, co-author of the Left Behind novels. The problem is that, theologically, Bush can't serve both these masters at once. The likes of LaHaye actively search for signs of the Second Coming of Christ and spend their days feverishly speculating about and preparing for the seven years’ battle for the world that will follow. Reconstructionists, Alan Jacobs, a professor at the evangelical college Wheaton, has explained, "are pretty confident Jesus isn’t going to show up any time soon," which is precisely their rationale for bringing the Book of Leviticus to life in the here-and-now.
There's no evidence that George Bush believes what Christian Reconstructionists believe. And in contrast to Ronald Reagan, who was always letting loose intemperate slips about America's role in Revelation's End Times showdown, the University of Chicago's Bruce Lincoln says, "in [Bush's] public messages I find very little that's apocalyptic."
Cautioning that it's almost impossible to know anyone's true beliefs, Lincoln still thinks he's got a pretty good sense of Bush's. The results help illuminate this question of how Bush maintains his peace of mind under such unimaginable stress.
When the drunken and dissolute prodigal finally found Jesus in the mid 1980s, the book of the Bible his study group was poring over was the Acts of the Apostles. "It's focused on missionizing, evangelizing, spreading the faith," Lincoln explains. "It's not end-of-the-world stuff. It's expansionist—it's religious imperialism, if you will. And I think that remains his primary orientation."
What's more, Lincoln adds, his primary orientation also holds that "the U.S. is the new Israel as God's most favored nation, and those responsible for the state of America in the world also enjoy special favor. . . . Foremost among the signs of grace—if I read him correctly—are the cardinal American virtues of courage, on the one hand, and compassion, on the other." For Bush to waver would be to tempt God's disfavor; what's more, we can speculate that the very act of holding to his resolve—what his critics identify as stubbornness and arrogance—becomes, tautologically, a way of both producing, and reassuring himself of, his special place in God's plan. The existential benefits are obvious. "Wherever the U.S. happens to advance something that he can call 'freedom,' he thinks he’s serving God's will, and he proclaims he's serving God's will."
In that sense at least Mr. Bush is precisely in tune with the premises of America's founding generations, who routinely thought of this as the New Israel.
MORE:
-SPEECH: We Will Be A City Upon A Hill (Ronald Reagan, January 25, 1974, First Conservative Political Action Conference)
-ESSAY: Our Union's Jewish State (David Klinghoffer, 3/17/04, The Forward)
-REVIEW: of The Puritan Dilemma: The Story of John Winthrop by Edmund Morgan
-REVIEW: of Promised Land, Crusader State: The American Encounter with the World Since 1776 by Walter MacDougall
-THE DEFIANT ONES
-IS CULTURE HOW YOU THINK OR WHAT YOU DRINK?
-LIBERTY AND JUSTICE UNDER GOD
-LET OUR PEOPLE GO
-PURITAN NATION
-Mel Gibson's Passion (Spengler, 3/09/04, Asia Times)
Wycliffe and his spiritual heirs, the Separatists who landed at Plymouth in 1620, set out to create a New Israel. Before the new Israel could arise, the ecclesia called out from amongst all nations, Christians first had to tear down the images of a Savior made in the image of a particular ethnicity.
Posted by Orrin Judd at May 8, 2004 9:25 AM
I've been thinking of starting up an e-business that, for a small up front fee, would undertake to perform certain services for those taken bodily into Heaven at the sounding of the Trump.
Posted by: David Cohen at May 8, 2004 10:15 AM"Iraq's a mess and half the country hates (the President)".....
And this is different from (1996, 1999, 2001....) exactly how?
Posted by: Andrew X at May 8, 2004 10:20 AMMr. Perlstein's article demonstrates the difficulty the secular press has with understanding religious faith. In a previous era it wouldn't even come up. Bush would just be seen as a conventionally, but sincerely religious man and that would be the end of it. These days, the press is used to public figures who are nominally religious but who never allow their faith, if they have it, to affect their public lives. Bush is in many ways an anomaly. I think it scares secularists and represents to them an opporunity to attack.
Attacks come in the form of suggesting that he's schizophrenic (hears the voice of God); that he's an extremist weirdo (Ahmanson); or that he's a Hollywood-style insane leader (Custer in "Little Big Man").
Certainly, I'm sure that both the Dems and the liberal press are very frustrated at Bush's coolness under fire.
However, I think his sangfroid can be explained by something other than mental illness. First, I think his religious faith does sustain him. He probably just does his best and then trusts in God. Secondly, however, he was trained by the Harvard Business School which teaches its future executives to surround themselves with the best people they can, assuring that different points of view are represented and then make decisions based on what will always be and can only be imperfect / incomplete information. But lastly, Bush is a former fighter pilot. For 5 years, he flew supersonic jets, alone. This means that each time he went up, he had multiple opportunities to make decisions which in a split second could end his life. In other words, he learned to be calm and cool under circumstances of great physical danger. He learned courage.
Posted by: L. Rogers at May 8, 2004 10:23 AMYou know, that may be the first time I've ever seen Acts described as "religious imperialism."
Posted by: Chris at May 8, 2004 11:04 AMI hope Sadir doesn't read this.
Posted by: Genecis at May 8, 2004 12:02 PMGood idea David. Make sure you only accept cash, just in case.
David's attitude explains why many Israelis are not offended by the support that they are getting from the Evangelical community in the US. If some wealthy and influential people want to help you out for reasons that are basically self-centered but you believe are religious delusions, do you turn them down?
If people from the local Baptist church believed that my house would be the spot where Jesus returned to Earth, and they volunteered to do all my home cleaning, maintenance and yard chores, should I tell them to get lost?
Posted by: Robert Duquette at May 8, 2004 12:23 PMThe Village Voice knows -- knows! -- that any day now George W. Bush is going to reveal himself to be in reality Martin Sheen's character in Stephen King's The Dead Zone, though with the Soviet Union gone, they're just not sure who he's going to nuke first in the name of the Lord.
Posted by: John at May 8, 2004 1:23 PMIt's too bad that the producers of The West Wing didn't secretly plan all along for it to be a prequel to the ending of The Dead Zone, and have that revealed in the last episode.
And lord yes, we all want a return to the caste-based puritanism that ruled portions of New England; where birth into proper protestant families determined whether you had wealth and power or not.
Posted by: Plutarch at May 9, 2004 4:42 AMIt's too bad that the producers of The West Wing didn't secretly plan all along for it to be a prequel to the ending of The Dead Zone, and have that revealed in the last episode.
ROFL -- especially since I just re-read King's On Writing -- specifically the part where he describes The Dead Zone and it's bad guy.
