May 28, 2004
SHUT THE BOX:
REVIEW: of Opening Skinner's Box: Great Psychological Experiments of the Twentieth Century by Lauren Slater (Farhad Manjoo, Salon.com)
Early in Lauren Slater's engaging new book, Opening Skinner's Box, the author reports an amusing conversation she has with Jerome Kagan, a psychologist at Harvard who insists that humans beings possess "free will." Kagan is having a hard time convincing Slater
of his view; in the middle of the last century, the psychologist B.F. Skinner showed, through a series of ingenious experiments with animals, that we are all far more mechanistic than we believe. We do what we do because we are conditioned to do it, because we are, all of us, acutely sensitive to rewards and reinforcements in the environment.Slater, who is herself a psychologist, agrees with Skinner. She tells Kagan, "I don't absolutely rule out the possibility that we are always either controlled or controlling, that our free will is really just a response to some cues that --" And just then, to prove that people really do whatever they want to do, "Kagan dives under his desk," Slater writes. "I mean that literally. He springs from his seat and goes head forward into nether regions beneath his desk so I cannot see him anymore."
Kagan shouts to Slater, "I'm under my desk. I've never gotten under my desk before. Is this not an act of free will?"
Opening Skinner's Box, in which Slater guides us through 10 landmark psychological experiments, brims with moments like this one -- unbelievable little scenes in which Slater or one of the many people she encounters does or says something so unexpected that you'll wonder, for just a split second, whether you're reading fiction. There's Kagan diving under his desk. There's the dour psychologist Robert Spitzer, who, when told that an old foe of his is laid up with a terminal disease that doctors can't diagnose, responds with perverse glee. There's Elizabeth Loftus, a famous memory researcher who "blurts out odd comments" and has "targets from a rifle practice affixed to her office wall." She volunteers her bra size to Slater. In the middle of a telephone interview, Loftus slams down the phone for no reason, then "calls back sheepishly," offering no explanation for her behavior.
And finally there's Slater herself, a writer so personally invested in her subject that she seems willing to risk just about anything for a good story.
Anyone really need another book to tell us that psychiatrists are a bunch of whackjobs? Posted by Orrin Judd at May 28, 2004 11:31 AM
Psychologists are not psychiatrists. There is a very important distinction -- I'm married to a psychiatrist.
Posted by: David Cohen at May 28, 2004 1:02 PMAnd mine is in the Psych department at Dartmouth--I rest my case. :)
Posted by: oj at May 28, 2004 1:24 PMAh yes - the rat-a-morphic account of human behavior - deep down inside we're all just a bunch of rodents.
Posted by: jd watson at May 28, 2004 1:42 PMOh, I see. Thought things were doing a little too smoothly at home heading into the Memorial Day weekend, did you?
Posted by: David Cohen at May 28, 2004 1:43 PMOJ and David: I'm not prepared to advance an analysis on what that means about the two of you.
Posted by: Chris at May 28, 2004 1:47 PMDavid:
You must get dragged to the Holiday parties and stuff--is there one of them, other than your blessed wife, you'd allow near your kids?
Posted by: oj at May 28, 2004 1:51 PMDavid --
A psychiatrist that I know told me that the difference was that psychologists can't prescribe.
Posted by: Uncle Bill at May 28, 2004 5:46 PMI remember a comment in a conversation many-many years ago:
"How different psychology might have been if Uncle Siggie hadn't turned on to toot. Next time someone tells you about how great psychiatry is, just remember, it was all dreamed up by a coke freak."
Posted by: Ken at May 28, 2004 8:11 PMYou guys are all being way too harsh. They are almost just like the rest of us. Why, just yesterday, I was reading that psychologists and psychiatrists share 99.8% of of our gene make-up.
Posted by: Peter B at May 28, 2004 9:36 PMI think I recall someone saying that psychology experiments with human subjects show what college undergraduates do.
Not quite the same thing as people.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at May 29, 2004 4:31 PM