May 24, 2004
IRAC:
The Lobotomized Weasel School of Writing (Crispin Sartwell, May 20, 2004, LA Times)
Today's educational establishment is making actual illiteracy look good, like an act of humanity and rebellion. Writing, which ought to nurture and give shape to thought, is instead being used to pound it into a powder and then reconstitute it into gruel.The thoroughly modern grade-A public-school prose style is not creative or interesting enough even to be wrong. The people who create and enforce the templates are, not to put too fine a point on it, people without understanding or imagination, lobotomized weasels for whom any effort of thought exceeds their strength. I recently read one of the many boilerplate descriptions of how students should write their essays. "The penultimate sentence," it said, "should restate your basic thesis of the essay." Well, who says? And why?
The description is nonsense, of course, no one reads the penultimate sentence, only the ultimate sentence, which is where you should restate your thesis. Posted by Orrin Judd at May 24, 2004 11:11 PM
I would like to see the original source from which this precept was lifted. I suspect the author thought "penultimate" was either an educated or an emphatic form of "ultimate."
Posted by: R.W. at May 24, 2004 11:28 PMAgree with R.W. My beloved Mrs. Schroeder (H.S. Composition 1979) beat into me with a verbal whip that the last sentence is the most important in a thesis.
She also handed out pamphlets of Politics and the English Language by George Orwell. Today she'd most likely get administratively lynched by any modern public high school.
At what point did laziness and political correctness replace scholarship in modern education?
Posted by: Gideon at May 25, 2004 1:15 AMArguably 1996, when they renormed the SATs.
Of course, that reflects decades of declining ability...
So, maybe the mid-80s.
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at May 25, 2004 5:17 AMThe use of computers is a bad joke, of course, but surely the reason we would even consider testing this way is that few of us have any notion of what learning English is about beyond functional literacy that will secure a job. Writing to inspire, to alarm, to persuade, to delight, etc. is now seen as as akin to painting or studying Latin--a harmless pastime of absolutely no use outside of very restricted circles.
Posted by: Peter B at May 25, 2004 6:55 AMPeter,
Interestingly enough, the local Catholic High School, who has had Latin offered as a class for years with not enough takers to justify paying a teacher to teach the course, has 3 full classes this Fall! Administration has had to call in local priests to teach!
Posted by: Bartman at May 25, 2004 7:57 AMBartman:
That is encouraging and rather astounding. But we must not rest until ancient Greek, rhetoric and theology are back in the compulsory core. Think T-shirts could help us? ;-)
Posted by: Peter B at May 25, 2004 8:15 AMI never had the opportunity to study Latin or Greek in elementary or high school (although I had two years of French and one of German; a rather amazing accomplishment for a very small rural North Dakota school). What did I miss?
Posted by: Roy Jacobsen at May 25, 2004 10:04 AMRoy,
Knowledge of Latin (and Greek) make entering the medical field so much easier. The immense amount of vocabulary is usually Latin or Greek based, making understanding a word's meaning all that much quicker to grasp. Also learning Latin makes it easier to understand any of the Romance languages...French, Italian, Romanian, Portuguese, and Spanish (ex. Bianco, Blanc, and Blanco all mean "white")
Posted by: Bartman at May 25, 2004 12:23 PMBartman:
"Also learning Latin makes it easier to understand any of the Romance languages...French..."
Congratulations. You have just driven Orrin into the anti-Latin camp.
Posted by: Peter B at May 25, 2004 12:28 PMOoops! Sorry oj, please let me continue to post.
Posted by: Bartman at May 25, 2004 4:36 PMRoy, not much.
Very, very few of those of us who had a little Latin in Catholic school ever got to the point where we could appreciate the reputed glories of Latin rhetoric.
A friend who is a classicist assures me that Greek has even greater glories, but so what?
Any English speaker ought to be mesmerized by the sonorities of Amos Tutuola's "Witch-Herbalist of the Remote Town," but the story is just silly.
Most of what you could read in Latin if you could read Latin is nonsense.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at May 25, 2004 5:40 PMWhy "Lobotomized Weasel"?
That's an insult to mustelids everywhere...
Posted by: Ken at May 25, 2004 6:39 PMHarry:
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
Harry are you going to let Peter get away with that comment? ; )
Posted by: Bartman at May 26, 2004 7:51 AMPenultimate is not the last sentance it's more of the sentance before last.
Posted by: Tara at September 2, 2004 6:19 PM