May 9, 2004
HUMANITY IS NOBLE, BUT WE ARE STILL WORKING ON PEOPLE:
Europe's messy backyard (Emanuele Ottolenghi, Jerusalem Post, 08/05/04)
The script was familiar. Chased by a mob, two boys (rumors said it was three) had jumped into the river of an ethnically mixed town. One drowned. The incident triggered a week of ethnic riots.Scores were killed. Places of worship and houses were burned. Panicked civilians, running for their lives, abandoned their property to looters and found temporary refuge in UN compounds, schools and hospitals, guarded by those same peacekeepers who had failed to protect their villages for want of an order to use lethal force against rioters. Few of them are likely to return home.
As in the 1990s, a few more thousand members of an ethnic minority became refugees overnight under the watchful eye of powerless international forces. As the familiar script dictates, European voices of reason explained the incident as the work of extremists, offered more economic aid as a solution and wisely suggested it would take time to heal the wounds of that foreign land.
The place was Kosovo. The setting was the Balkans. But these events did not happen a decade ago, just weeks ago, on March 16. And this time there was a new twist to the script.
The ethnic communities involved were, proverbially, Serb Orthodox and Muslims. But this time it was not Serbs chasing Bosnian or Albanian Muslims, burning their mosques, and looting their homes. It was mostly Muslims chasing Serbs. It was churches, some of them Orthodox monasteries from the 14th century, that were going up in smoke.
Someone, inadvertently, had changed the script, reversing roles and trading places. The "bad guys" had become victims; the "good guys," ruthless perpetrators.
This was unsettling: Europe's public had been told all along that Serbs were bad, Muslims were good: Serbs were engaged in ethnic cleansing, Albanians were victims of ethnic cleansing. Who authorized the swap? [...]
The March riots in Kosovo look like a bad movie sequel that nobody wants to go see. These are sometimes the ways of the world. Too complicated, too unpredictable to stick to the script, too brutally untamed not to heed the call of nature, too frightening for multicultural simpletons to be manageable under the banner of the "oh, if we could all get along" ideology.
Wishful thinking is neither a political argument nor a recipe for state-building. Europeans are busy lecturing America on its failure to grasp the intractable realities of Iraq's ethnic and religious mosaic. But Iraq is far and away; Kosovo is in Europe. They should look at their backyard instead, and see the mess they got themselves into.
What horror and havoc have been inflicted on the world by Western progressives taking up causes in the name human rights, that noxious concept that undergirds modern totalitarian impulses.
Especially when not seeking UN approval first.
Posted by: genecis at May 9, 2004 1:48 PMThe horror and havoc were already there. The error of the progressives is to believe that they could remedy age-old ethnic hatreds with economic aid and "peacekeeping" contingents who never fire their weapons. But they didn't cause the underlying problem.
Posted by: Robert Duquette at May 9, 2004 1:51 PMThey may not cause the problems, but their attempts at solutions only allow the problems to grow and fester and cause even greater death and destruction at a later date. The best example is Palestine, and they seem to want to make Yugoslavia a 21st century synonym.
What's even more particularly hilarious is American conservatives lecturing anyone about human rights, given their historical opposition to such rights - especially when white people weren't involved.
Posted by: Plutarch at May 9, 2004 8:10 PMOooh! Zing! Plutarch's got us! Gee, that was brilliant.
Posted by: Timothy at May 9, 2004 9:07 PMPlutarch --
Almost any culture worth studying evinced prejudice against those not on the mainstream. But by and large only Western (mostly white males) civilization has really cared to atone for and correct for these "sins". These is a culture worth preserving, not destroying every step of the way by capitulating to every fad that comes along. The culture is strong enough to change when necessary.
Posted by: MG at May 9, 2004 9:31 PMRobert:
I think it is deeper than simply a case of naivite or lack of firepower. It the case of Kosovo, human rights was used as the excuse to go in and bomb the Serbs, redraw their borders and rewrite the timeless script of Balkan hatred. I hold no brief for the Serbs, but I find it terribly disturbing that Western populations would not have supported this venture without being bombarded and harangued by those two words, which are never defined and don't add up to much in specific circumstances. They are an all-purpose excuse for a kind of Western elite imperialism that is completely removed from self-defence, realpolitik, self-interest, compassion in any concrete sense or any need to be informed about the culture or politics of those attacked.
Because the phrase does at times encompass a general, ill-defined concern for real evils like honour killings, ethnic slaughter, the international sex slavery trade, etc., it is impossible to say one is "against" human rights. But Kosovo showed it is the secular call to arms, permitting the West to attack willy-nilly, wherever and in force on the basis of little more than inflammatory media reports and flavour-of-the-month popular causes. It is also the phrase that turns foreigners into sub-humans.
Posted by: Peter B at May 10, 2004 6:58 AM"...where I learned with little labor
The way to Love My Fellow Man
And hate my next-door neighbor."
-- G K Chesterton
