May 31, 2004

EVEN LE PEN IS ON THE RIGHT SIDE ONCE IN AWHILE (via Tom Corcoran)

Remembering the Vendée (Sophie Masson, LewRockwell.com)

In 1789, the French Revolution began, a revolution that at first was full of optimism, of the genuine wish for reform; a revolution that was not even opposed by King Louis XVI himself. This was the Enlightenment. Humanity was to be trusted to behave well. Liberty, equality, fraternity. Who could argue with that? Very few did, least of all the peasants of western France, who welcomed many of the changes – the abolition of compulsory labour, the gradual abolition of privilege. The revolutionaries produced a passionate and idealistic document, the Declaration of the Rights of Man. Some of those rights were the right to freedom of religion; the right to live peacefully, without tyranny or arbitrary rule; the right to discuss. Alas! While Desmoulins and Danton debated and wrote passionately, Robespierre bided his time. That time came all too soon.

In 1790, the first cracks began to appear. Provincial assemblies were abolished, stripping people of their local governments. The clergy was to be stripped of its property and would be appointed by lay people, not the church. In practice, this meant that the bourgeois of the cities now had the right of imposing chosen priests on peasant communities. Vendée and Brittany and Normandy began to stir at this; they were greatly attached to their own priests and resisted the imposition of others. A year later, the King was arrested. Riots erupted in Brittany. In 1792, the extremist Jacobins under the leadership of Robespierre took power and formed the now infamous Convention. And then the horrors began in earnest.

Madame Guillotine was fed many times, soon taking Danton and Desmoulins and many of the earlier revolutionaries, who, too late, had seen the monster they had unleashed. But it was not till 1793 that two events happened which precipitated France into a terrible civil war; the consequences of which are still very much felt today.

Those events were the execution of Louis XVI, the subsequent pre-emptive declaration of war by France on the rest of Europe, and, as a consequence, the forced conscription of 300,000 men – the revolutionaries wanted the peasants of France to pay for their murderous folly! There was immediate revolt in Vendée, in Brittany, in Normandy, but the centre of the revolt was Vendée itself. This was a completely popular uprising; it was the peasants themselves who took the initiative and who only later persuaded some of their native nobles, who had been army officers, to lead some of their armies.

The new, the First Republic reacted immediately. This would be a fight to the death, for it was a tussle for the very spirit of revolution. The fact that the Vendée revolt was a popular one called into question the very nature of the Revolution, with its middle-class and aristocratic leaders. More than that, it dared to oppose the "despotism of liberty." Republican armies led, more often than not, by ci-devant ex-nobles and princes were sent into the rebellious province. But the Vendéens proved difficult nuts to crack. To the contemptuous surprise of the Paris grandees, the armies of the Chouans, as they became known (because of their rallying call, which imitated the call of the screech owl, or chat-huant in French), were well-disciplined and highly effective, and unusual in that the men had an input into decisions, not just the leaders (some of course later saw that as a weakness). They fought with a combination of regular and guerilla tactics and had a number of brilliant leaders – Cathelineau, La Rochejacquelein, Charrette, d'Elbée, Stofflet, Lescure. The Bretons, under Cadoudal, Jean Jan, Jean Cottereau and others, joined them at several points.

In the first year, they were remarkably successful, and their armies swelled to more than 150,000 men, none of whom had been coerced or conscripted. They captured towns and villages, made tentative links with the English, who were horrified by the fate of the King, and with the émigré nobles who had escaped to England already. It seemed that not only the liberation of western France, but also of the whole of France from the tyranny and terror of the Convention was at hand. Alas . . .

Division began to appear in Chouan ranks, as leaders with strong egos fought with each other, the English and the French émigrés (many of whom scorned this "peasant army") proved to be of no help whatsoever, and the Republic spared no expense of finance or soldiers' lives to crush the rebels. The crushing defeat of the Chouan armies at the end of 1793 in Vendée did not predispose the Republic to mercy. In early 1794, the Convention decided to exterminate the Vendéens, to the last man, woman and child. And they found plenty who were happy to carry out these orders.

"Not one is to be left alive." "Women are reproductive furrows who must be ploughed under." "Only wolves must be left to roam that land." "Fire, blood, death are needed to preserve liberty." "Their instruments of fanaticism and superstition must be smashed." These were some of the words the Convention used in speaking of Vendée. Their tame scientists dreamed up all kinds of new ideas – the poisoning of flour and alcohol and water supplies, the setting up of a tannery in Angers which would specialise in the treatment of human skins; the investigation of methods of burning large numbers of people in large ovens, so their fat could be rendered down efficiently. One of the Republican generals, Carrier, was scornful of such research: these "modern" methods would take too long. Better to use more time-honoured methods of massacre: the mass drownings of naked men, women, and children, often tied together in what he called "republican marriages," off specially constructed boats towed out to the middle of the Loire and then sunk; the mass bayoneting of men, women and children; the smashing of babies' heads against walls; the slaughter of prisoners using cannons; the most grisly and disgusting tortures; the burning and pillaging of villages, towns and churches.

The ci-devant aristocrat Turreau de la Linières took command of what are known in Vendée as the douze colonnes infernales (the twelve columns of hell), which had specific orders both from his superiors and from himself to kill everyone and everything they saw. "Even if there should be patriots [that is, Republicans] in Vendée," Turreau himself said, "they must not spared. We can make no distinction. The entire province must be a cemetery." And so it was. In the streets of Cholet, emblematic Vendéen city, by the end of 1793, wolves were about the only living things left, roaming freely and feeding on the piles of decomposing corpses.

People in Vendée still tell the stories of the colonnes infernales and the unspeakable things they did. There was not even any pretence of discriminating between fighters and civilians; documents of the time, still kept in army records in Vincennes, tell their hideous, chilling story, a story which has tolled repeatedly in our own terrible century. The generals speak coolly of objectives achieved, exterminations nicely done, "ethnic cleansing" carefully carried out, of genocide systematically and rigorously conducted. There were those, too few, alas, who refused to take part; but they were summarily dealt with.

But the Vendéens were not completely beaten. Full of hate now, they fought back, sporadically but ferociously. Their "chouan" rallying cry became a source of terror for republican stragglers in the deep remote country of the marshes and forests of Vendée. And the Bretons fought, attempting to come to the aid of their brothers, but it was difficult to maintain resistance in the face of such full-scale assault. One by one, the charismatic leaders were killed or hunted down like wild beasts. Within two years, Chouan resistance in Vendée was all but dead, though Brittany, under the leadership of the remarkable Georges Cadoudal, continued to fight for many years to come. [...]

Right wing, left wing, centre in France have never been able to deal with the legacy of Vendée. The left wing has problems with the impugning of the Revolution; the right wing because civil war put France in peril of foreign armies; the centre because, hey, it's not exactly pretty stuff. Thirty or so years ago a then-unknown but now infamous Jean-Marie le Pen championed the cause of Vendée and Brittany, applauding regionalism and independence, and produced a recording of Chouan songs; now, as the leader of the extreme right Front National, he studiously ignores it all, speaking grandly and opportunistically of the marvellous republic and the great destiny of a centralised France – for Vendée costs votes. Vendée is embarrassing, for it shows what the French are capable of doing to the French without any help from immigrant bogeys. The extreme left, the communists, of course never had any warm feelings for "priest-ridden peasants." Besides, they understood Robespierre's "despotism of liberty" only too well.

Many people in Vendée who keep the memory in their hearts refuse to vote at all in general elections, considering that the soul of the republic itself is soiled and flawed. They find it bitter indeed that the 1989 bicentenary ignored them completely. There are some who would sanctify all the Chouans, would make of them impossibly perfect heroes. For them, the "Bleus," the republicans, were devils without any redeeming features. But it is remarkable how many in Vendée do not hate. They only wish to remember.


There's a good Balzac novel about the mostly forgotten story. It's even on-line.

Posted by Orrin Judd at May 31, 2004 4:34 PM
Comments

Sounds just like the Albigensian Crusade.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at May 31, 2004 5:22 PM

Which was right too. Heresy from the Church could not be allowed, from statism must be.

Posted by: oj at May 31, 2004 7:21 PM

The history of the world to date does not lead me to fall for might-makes-right arguments.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at May 31, 2004 8:15 PM

It does me--we're the mightiest.

Posted by: oj at May 31, 2004 10:58 PM

I think I said in a thread a couple of weeks ago that the left has had the upper hand in France in the last 50 years because the right played its hand so badly during the first half of the 20th century. Dreyfuss, WWI, the great Depression, Petain, Dien Bien Phu, Algeria left them completely discredited and exhausted.

Its a race now between the left and the Arabs, who can finish off France before the right comes around.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at May 31, 2004 11:25 PM

"Heresy from the church ..."

That's one way to justify the slaughter resulting when fairy tales compete for the mantle of Absolute Truth.

Posted by: Jeff Guinn at June 1, 2004 7:08 AM

Harry/Jeff:

You are quite wrong about that. There were decades of efforts by the Church to reconcile with and accommodate the Albigensians before the crusade against them was launched. If you delved a little more deeply into their beliefs, you might appreciate more why they were perceived as being so dangerous. Did you know many of them believed sex was bad and that women couldn't go to heaven?

The Choans, by contrast, were fighting for traditional, local control over their affairs. We can't have that in a secular paradise, can we?

Posted by: Peter B at June 1, 2004 9:06 AM

Peter: Don't touch the Albigensian heresy. That's Harry's cuddle-up-with-it-at-night punchline, time after time. Lord only knows what might happen if he's forced to deal with the more unpleasant side of that group.

Posted by: Chris at June 1, 2004 9:44 AM

It reminds me both of Gen. Sherman's March to the Sea, and Andersonville.

Also, Pol Pot.

Posted by: Michael Herdegen at June 1, 2004 9:44 AM

Michael:

If one is unable to differentiate a just cause from an unjust and a willful genocide from simple warfare and disease.

Posted by: oj at June 1, 2004 10:29 AM

Remember that the French Revolution was taken as the model for revolutions around the world for the next 200 years, from Paris to Phnom Penh, from Moscow to Beijing. Until the Warsaw Pact Fire Sale of 1989 moved back to the American Revolution model, all revolutionaries copied and rehashed the French version. The Perfect Utopian Omelette that requires smashing more and more eggs, the Star Trek FEDERATION! always on the other side of the Necessary Emergency Measures of the Killing Fields.

L'Age de Raison n'a pas besoin de licornes.

Posted by: Ken at June 1, 2004 12:54 PM

Well, I think the Albigensian beliefs were silly, but no sillier than the Christians' beliefs.

So what's the point?

Were the Albigensians bad subjects, turbulent, tax-avoiders?

No. They were remarkably good citizens, better behaved than most Christians.

Killing people for thought-crime, which is what we talking about in both instances, is always a bad idea.

Even Orrin, in certain moods, is agreeable to the concept of letting heathens like me continue to live so long as we conform.

In other moods, off with our heads.

Whatever the practical merits of such thinking, it cuts the heart out of any moral claims.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at June 1, 2004 3:44 PM

Harry:

Not quite. I think the off with the heads option totally justified, just out of use these days.

Posted by: oj at June 1, 2004 5:14 PM

Couldn't we take from this the lesson that the Arabs are unlikely to win in France, because if the French state could do this in Vendée against other Frenchmen, what will restrain them against the immigrants?

Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at June 1, 2004 9:24 PM

One lesson you could take from it would be that the French revolutionaries, having no tradition or understanding of self-government, made stupid mistakes that more experienced revolutionaries -- like the Americans -- avoided.

So we might expect that even if Arabs change their spots and suddenly start admiring self-government, they'll be incompetent at it for, oh, 2 or 3 centuries.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at June 1, 2004 9:50 PM

AOG:

France was still at least a shadow of a great nation then.

Posted by: oj at June 1, 2004 10:30 PM

oj:

Andersonville was much more miserable than simple war and disease made other POW camps.

Gen. Sherman's March to the Sea happened during a "just cause", but was not, in and of itself, a just campaign.

If you are consistent in applying your "leave it be" philosophy of human events, wouldn't you be against the Union fighting the Civil War ?
After all, with the benefit of hindsight, we can clearly see that slavery wasn't going to last more than another three generations - What was the hurry ?

(For those who might object that the Union wasn't fighting to free the slaves, that's true, but absent slavery, there wouldn't have been an armed power struggle between the North and South, merely a continuation of the political one).

Posted by: Michael Herdegen at June 2, 2004 12:15 AM

Michael:

Andersonville was no different than anywhere else, the South just had less to give to prisoners.

Sherman's march was perfectly just. Citizens are legitimate targets in democracies.

The point that we didn't fight to free the slaves but to preserve the Union is that the South would have become a different nation, one without slavery eventually, but a separate state.

Posted by: oj at June 2, 2004 12:25 AM
« ARE THEY LIES IF YOU MAKE YOUR OWN POSITIONS MURKY ENOUGH?: | Main | WHERE'S THE BLACKLIST WHEN YOU NEED IT...: »