May 24, 2004
BEATING AK-47s INTO BUTTERFLY BALLOTS:
US closes in on deal with Iraqi cleric: Officials say talks are under way to turn Moqtada al-Sadr's army into a political group. (Orly Halpern, 5/25/04, CS Monitor)
As fighting between Shiite militiamen and US-led coalition forces continued Monday, the outline of a Fallujah-like solution began to emerge.The death toll rose in Baghdad and Kufa as the Mahdi Army of militant Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr battled US troops. But behind the scenes, direct negotiations were under way to transform Sadr's militia into a political entity and end a violent rebellion.
The coalition has declared repeatedly that it will not negotiate with "militias and criminals." Nonetheless, a deal may be forthcoming with Sadr, said an official close to the talks. The coalition has previously said it wanted the cleric killed or captured.
If the deal pans out, it could bring to an end the seven-week conflict. The hope is that by engaging Sadr politically, the coalition can neutralize him militarily. His militia might also eventually be integrated into the Iraqi national security forces.
Such an accord would reverse previously held coalition strategies - much as happened in Fallujah. In that Iraqi city, the scene of intense fighting in April, militia including many of the same insurgents who were fighting the Marines are now in charge of keeping the peace.
Get him out in the open and someone will surely whack him.
MORE:
U.S. Seems Ready to Allow Iraqi Militias to Keep Arms (DEXTER FILKINS, 5/25/04, NY Times)
The danger is that on June 30 the Americans will hand over power to an Iraqi administration that will not have a monopoly on the use of armed force, in an environment that many fear could set the stage for sectarian and ethnic warfare as the country moves toward what are intended to be democratic elections.Posted by Orrin Judd at May 24, 2004 10:56 PMAs that date approaches, the Americans are quietly allowing some of these armed groups to flourish and, in some cases, have even helped recreate them.
In Falluja, the scene of deadly fighting last month, American commanders agreed to set up an Iraqi security force composed almost entirely of former members of Mr. Hussein's Republican Guard and anti-American guerrillas.
In Baghdad and southern Iraq, the Americans have allowed the two largest Shiite militias, the Badr Corps and the Dawa army, to remain intact, largely on the promise by their leaders that the fighters will stay off the streets.
In northern Iraq, as part of the effort to disband the 60,000-man Kurdish militia, entire military units simply donned police uniforms of the new Iraqi state but otherwise stayed in the same place with the same commanders.
Even fighters in the Mahdi Army of the radical Shiite cleric Moktada al-Sadr, whom American soldiers have been killing in large numbers in recent weeks, may be given a chance for legitimacy. In a recent news conference, the general commanding American forces in Najaf and Karbala said he would be willing to consider taking Mahdi Army militiamen into a new Iraqi security force being set up to help secure southern Iraq. [...]
In some cases, the Americans have allowed militias that it considers friendly simply to change their names. The Badr Corps, for instance, has changed its name to the Badr Reconstruction Organization, and its leaders claim that it is now involved only in cultural activities. The head of the group, Abu Hassan al-Ameri, remains in his same offices, and his men still carry Kalashnikov rifles. "All of our guns have been licensed by the Americans," Mr. Ameri said.
As with most other militias, the Badr organization is made up almost entirely of a single religious or ethnic group. So strong is the Shiite identification of the Badr Corps that in the 1980's, during the Iran-Iraq war, some of its members fought for Iran, another majority-Shiite country, against the Sunni-led forces of Iraq.
From the beginning, the task of disarming the militias has been a difficult one. Every Iraqi family is permitted to own one high-powered assault rifle, and virtually all of them do. Like the American minutemen of yore, the militias are composed mostly of civilians, who assemble — or disappear — on short notice.
While the United States has tried a hands-off approach with armed groups it regards as friendly, it has tried to co-opt ones that have demonstrated hostility. After the heavy fighting in Falluja last month, American commanders accepted an offer from a former general in the Republican Guards to set up a security force of his former troops.
One result is that Falluja has been mostly peaceful since the deal was reached a month ago. But the peace has come at considerable cost: It has enraged mainstream Shiites, who were stunned to learn that the Americans had resurrected the very soldiers they deposed a year before. Shiite leaders worry that the short-term peace in Falluja will give way to disaster in the future.
"Today, they are in Falluja; tomorrow they will be in Baghdad," said Mr. Mehdi, the Shiite leader.
These days in Falluja, the line separating an insurgent and a member of the "security forces" is sometimes invisible.
"All the people in Falluja are fighters," said Naji Obeid, a 35-year-old member of the Iraqi Civil Defense Corps, an American-sponsored force.
When the Marines tried to enter Falluja last month, Mr. Obeid joined the fight against them. When the peace deal was struck, he put his Iraqi civil defense uniform back on and returned to work.
"The people, they were fighting against the Americans, and they were fighting to protect their city," he said. "And now they are in the new Iraqi Army, protecting their city."
If Sadr isn't killed or jailed the "Bush is a wimp" theme will be all over the blogs.
Posted by: AWW at May 24, 2004 11:35 PMHeadlines predicted for tomorrow morning:
Bush fails to set timetable for bringing troops home
Bush asks for yet more money for war
Bush attempts to bury atrocities in Abu Ghraib
If Sadr isn't captured or killed Bush will have proved himself a wimp by his own standards. In fact, he's pretty much done that already by taking so long to finish him off.
Essentially, we're going to try to run a democracy with a myriad of private armies running around. That's not the prescription for democracy; it is the prelude to civil war, though. The only thing preventing it right now is our presence: we give the Iraqis the one thing they apparently need, someone they can hate even more than their neighbors.
Posted by: Derek Copold at May 25, 2004 3:12 PMWhat's wrong with a civil war if the Sunni and Shia wish separate states?
Posted by: oj at May 25, 2004 3:19 PMWhat's wrong with a civil war is that it gives us another Lebanon or Afghanistan, except much larger. Now cast your mind back, oh, a few years, and tell us what those country's main exports were during their civil wars.
Posted by: Derek Copold at May 25, 2004 3:54 PMNothing?
Posted by: oj at May 25, 2004 4:01 PMOpium, murder, I think he meant.
If going to the negotiating table with, eg, N. Korea is a defeat in itself, then it seems to me that all this dancing with Muqtadar is a defeat in itself.
Not a serious defeat, and when someone bumps him off, as someone undoubtedly will, his 'organization' probably will wither away.
The significance of Muqtadar is that he exposed the sham of all the other Shia politicoes. No program, no party, no organization, no future.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at May 28, 2004 2:50 PM