April 10, 2004

BUT WHAT REALLY IS SHOCKING IS THEY OMITTED RIGOBERTA MENCHU

Kim Campbell: One of the world's great leaders? (Richard Foot, Saskatoon Star-Phoenix, 10/04/04)

Former prime minister Kim Campbell, best known for her brief and unspectacular tenure in high office, has been named by the National Geographic Society as one of history's 50 "most important" political leaders.

Campbell's name appears on a list of influential leaders in a new reference book -- the Almanac of World History, recently published by the society -- alongside such historical giants as Alexander the Great, Cleopatra, Napoleon Bonaparte, Abraham Lincoln and Winston Churchill.

Campbell's inclusion on the list has historians in this country shaking their heads.

"It's ridiculous," says Michael Bliss, an author and historian at the University of Toronto.

But the American editor of the Almanac says Campbell belongs in the pantheon of historical greats for the simple reason she was Canada's first female prime minister.

"Given that there have not been that many females who have led nations, we chose to include her," says Jane Sunderland, a project manager at the Washington D.C.-based society, who says she "stands by the choice" of the book's authors.

James Marsh, editor-in-chief of The Canadian Encyclopedia, has a different view.

"I don't think Kim Campbell should even make a list of great Canadian leaders," he says. "She was the first and only (female) prime minister of Canada -- and that's stretching her accomplishments to the limit."...

As for Campbell, the Almanac says nothing about her legacy except that she is a woman.

Those of you who neglected to do postgraduate work in Canadian Studies (without which no classical education is complete) may not know Ms. Campbell was so embarrassing even ardent feminists were happy to forget her. Chosen leader in a Jesse Ventura-like freak, she called an early election, during which she canoodled openly and defiantly with a Russian “bizinessman” of dubious provenance. She led the Conservatives to an obliteration that proved permanent and has resided in the U.S. ever since. Her one memorable quote was that an election “is no time to discuss serious issues”.

Posted by Peter Burnet at April 10, 2004 11:28 AM
Comments

That reminds me of one of the shortest books I've seen, "Women Winners of Science Nobel Prizes". It would have been the shortest, but the editors of the book padded it with stories of several women who did not actually win a Nobel Prize. The editors felt these women had been shortchanged by the Nobel Committee, so they thought to remedy the mistake in their book.
The Almanac editors clearly do not understand how insulting they are to women.

Posted by: RB at April 10, 2004 12:33 PM

Kim Campbell's great accomplishment was to take the Progressive Conservative party from an abolute majority in the Canadian Parliament to two (2) members in one election. Has any major political party in any Western democracy ever collapsed as fast at that? (At least it gives the Democrats a goal to shoot for...)

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at April 10, 2004 2:37 PM

Reference books are often written by lefties. I remember about a dozen years ago looking up something in the Columbia Desk Encyclopedia (?), and listed in the chronology of major events of one year in the '80s was something like "the Women's March for Nuclear Disarmament." I suspect one of the editors attended and felt she was advancing the revolution by including it.

Posted by: PapayaSF at April 10, 2004 7:32 PM

Well, Eva Peron is on the list, too. And so is Mussolini.

Posted by: jim hamlen at April 10, 2004 11:10 PM

Clearly the Society should stick to Geography.

Posted by: at April 11, 2004 7:51 PM

Dare I ask? Margaret Thatcher? Golda Mier? Indira Ghandi? Elizabeth I? Theodora?

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at April 11, 2004 11:12 PM

Meir and Theodora didn't make the list but the rest did.

Posted by: DLirag at April 13, 2004 11:03 AM
« MANDATUM NOVUM: | Main | MISINFORMATION: »