March 27, 2004
YOU DON'T SAY...:
Democrats' Ads in Tandem Provoke G.O.P.: An analysis of advertising data shows a striking synchronicity between the advertising campaigns of Senator
John Kerry, Moveon.org and the Media Fund. (JIM RUTENBERG, 3/27/04, NY Times)
Senator John Kerry's advertising campaign is so closely complemented by those of two major liberal groups running commercials against President Bush that Republicans are accusing the Democrats of trying to evade campaign finance laws.Posted by Orrin Judd at March 27, 2004 8:38 AMAn analysis of advertising data provided by Republicans, Democrats and an independent group shows a striking synchronicity between the advertising campaigns of Mr. Kerry and Moveon.org and the Media Fund, which flatly deny any illegal consultations. They have been advertising in the same 17 swing states, in most of the same markets while almost uniformly ignoring others.
In mid-March, while Mr. Kerry advertised slightly more in the morning, the groups advertised slightly more at night. At other times of day, the two groups and the Kerry campaign together matched Mr. Bush's advertising nearly spot for spot, in a couple of cases exceeding it. That level of correlation has delighted Democrats, who acknowledge that the groups have gone a long way in helping Mr. Kerry to meet the advertising onslaught of Mr. Bush, whose campaign has raised far more money.
Officials of the two groups say that they do not need to speak to the Kerry campaign to join it in answering the Bush campaign. But such help is becoming a focal point in what is widely expected to be a legal battle with Republicans and some advocates of election reform over what legitimate role the groups, which are called 527 committees for the section of the tax code that created them, should be allowed to play.
The 527 groups' significance has grown exponentially this election cycle because they are able to collect millions in unregulated, unlimited contributions from unions, corporations and wealthy individuals. The parties and candidates are now prohibited from that type of fund-raising under the new campaign finance law.
While the law does not affect the fund-raising practices of these groups, it prohibited them from coordinating their efforts with federal parties or candidates.
"While the law does not affect the fund-raising practices of these groups, it prohibited them from coordinating their efforts with federal parties or candidates."
I wonder if it was intentional on Rutenberg's to use the past tense of prohibit?
Posted by: Bartman at March 27, 2004 10:20 AM"I wonder if it was intentional on Rutenberg's to use the past tense of prohibit?"
Most likely it was a subconscious slip of the obvious by Rutenberg.
Posted by: Mike M at March 27, 2004 10:53 AMWhy worry about real campaign scandals like this or the upcoming votie fraud by the Dems when we can get all exercised by the President's jokes or the contents of his campaign ads?
Wouldn't an effective 527 group pay close attention to what the candidate's own ads were saying, and where ?
Also, wouldn't an effective campaign staff watch 527 efforts, and co-opt any ideas that work ?
If the campaign's ads run mostly in the morning, wouldn't an effective 527 group fill up the nights ?
I can well believe that there's no coordination; There doesn't have to be.
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at March 27, 2004 2:01 PMGosh, who could have predicted that the 527 organizations would simply ignore campaign finance "reform" laws and count on getting away with it until after the election?
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at March 27, 2004 3:43 PMIf you think the Democrats got exercised about Richard Clarke, just wait until the FEC votes on the 'legality' of 527s. They will accuse the Republicans of staging a coup and installing "the rich" right on the throne.
Posted by: jim hamlen at March 27, 2004 7:11 PMJim - that assumes the FEC is going to rule against the 527s. I'm not so confident and that is way I don't believe that one of the advantages Bush has over Kerry is the money factor as Kerry will get lots of outside help (not to mention the free support from abcnbscbsnytimesetc)
Posted by: AWW at March 27, 2004 11:16 PMoj:
Sure, but as long as there's no contact between the 527 groups and the campaigns, and no one person or committee is directing efforts, it cannot be stopped.
How are you going to legislate that people can't observe other's actions, and work to maximize their self-interest ?
All you can say is that the political campaigns and 527 groups can't associate.
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at March 28, 2004 12:49 AMMichael:
Why? The whole scheme of CFR is anti-constitutional--why would it stop here?
Posted by: oj at March 28, 2004 12:54 AM