March 28, 2004
STILL SHRUGGING (via Tom Morin):
The Holocaust Shrug: Why is there so much indifference to the liberation of Iraq? (David Gelernter, 04/05/2004, Weekly Standard)
[S]addam, like Hitler, murdered people sadistically and systematically for the crime of being born. Saddam, like Hitler, believed that mass murder should be efficient, with minimal fuss and bother; it is no accident that both were big believers in poison gas. Saddam's program, like Hitler's, attracted all sorts of sadists; many of Saddam's and Hitler's crimes were not quite as no-fuss, no-muss as the Big Boss preferred. Evidently Saddam, like Hitler, did not personally torture his prisoners, but Saddam (like Hitler) allowed and condoned torture that will stand as a black mark against mankind forever.Hitler was in a profoundly, fundamentally different league. And yet the distinction is unlikely to have mattered much to a Kurd mother watching her child choke to death on poison gas, or a Shiite about to be diced to bloody pulp. The colossal scale and the routine, systematic nature of torture and murder under Saddam puts him in a special category too. Saddam was small compared with Hitler, yet he was like Hitler not only in what he wanted but in what he did. When we marched into Iraq, we halted a small-scale holocaust.
I could understand people disagreeing with this claim, arguing that Saddam was evil but not that kind of evil, not evil enough to deserve being discussed in those terms. But the opposition I hear doesn't dwell on the nature of Saddam's crimes. It dwells on the nature of America's--our mistakes, our malfeasance, our "lies." It sounds loonier and farther from reality all the time, more and more like the Holocaust Shrug.
Turning away is not evil; it is merely human. And that's bad enough. For years I myself found it easy to ignore or shrug off Saddam's reported crimes. I had no love for Iraq or Iraqis. Before and during the war I wrote pieces suggesting that Americans not romanticize Iraqis; that we understand postwar Iraq more in terms of occupied Germany than liberated France. But during and after the war it gradually became impossible to ignore the staggering enormity of what Saddam had committed against his own people. And when we saw those mass graveyards and torture chambers, heard more and more victims speak, watched those videotapes, the conclusion became inescapable: This war was screamingly, shriekingly necessary.
But instead of exulting in our victory, too many of us shrug and turn away and change the subject.
This is too easy though--patting ourselves on the back after we've gotten rid of Saddam--the question we face is : how can we justify to ourselves allowing the very same things to happen in North Korea? Posted by Orrin Judd at March 28, 2004 8:57 PM
We have been conditioned by the media to believe that the pinnacle for human suffering was reached in Germany 1945 and therefore all other suffering is insignificant or trumped up (see - Stalin, Pol Pot, Mugabe, Castro, Nigeria, N.K., Burma, etc., etc., etc.).
Posted by: J.H. at March 29, 2004 10:13 AMWell, you have those Holocaust memorials in Europe engraved with variations of "Never Again." Couple this with the irrational belief that society is evolving and that we're becoming better and more noble. (After all, our technology is has advanced amazingly in the past century, <fe>QED</fe> our society must also have advanced.) Then when one is confronted with evidence that it may be happening again, one just ignores the evidence and rests in the illusory comfort of those noble (but ultimately empty) words.
Posted by: Roy Jacobsen at March 29, 2004 11:27 AMIt's because Hitler has achieved after his death what he was gunning for in life: Deification. His reputation (cemented by "Remember The Holocaust!") has become that of a God of Evil, and compared to a god, "Stalin, Pol Pot, Mugabe, Castro, Nigeria, N.K., Burma, etc., etc." are but mere mortals.
I remember an interview with Mel Brooks where he was asked why he used Nazis so much in his farce comedies. His answer was he wanted to make them look ridiculous, and if you were able to laugh at their pettiness and pretension, following them would become equally ridiculous.
Chaplin's classic The Great Dictator had a similar attitude; I've heard it said that if that movie had been produced before the fact (pre-1933) and shown in Germany, the Nazis would have been laughed out of any chance at power.
But 60+ years of Remember the Holocaust have established A.H. as another Sauron, and the Dark Lord's hand reaches far, even when the Dark Lord is absent. Even his badge (the hooked cross) sprayed on a wall by some dumb punks causes great panic.
"Couple this with the irrational belief that society is evolving and that we're becoming better and more noble."
"We've Evolved Beyond All That!"
(Cue the theme from Star Trek...)
"(After all, our technology is/has advanced amazingly in the past century, QED our society must also have advanced.)"
"They're a technologically-advenced society; their intentions MUST be Peaceful."
-- Mars Attacks (YAK YAK! YAK! YAK YAK YAK!)
