March 31, 2004

SAM'S CLUB:

No ‘Choice’: Wal-Mart prepares to bury the left under a mountain of money (Glen Ford and Peter Gamble, 3.31.04, In These Times)

Jim, John, Alice, Sam and Helen may carry the world’s most dangerous genetic markers. They are the Waltons, heirs to the global destructive force called Wal-Mart.

With more than $100 billion in personal assets among them, the five Waltons occupy positions six through 10 in the Forbes billionaires rankings, twice as rich as Microsoft’s Bill Gates, the guy at the top. Collectively, they are antisocial malevolence with a last name. These spawn of Bentonville, Arkansas harbor an abiding hatred for the public sphere: business regulatory controls, nondiscrimination laws, wage and workplace safety standards, the social safety net—all of it—as expressed through the operations of their retail empire, which is both the largest employer in the United States and biggest importer of goods made in China. As the Democratic Socialists of America put it: “Wal-Mart is more than just a participant in the low-wage economy: It is the most important single beneficiary of that economy. It uses its economic and political power to extend the scope of the low-wage economy and threatens to extend its business model into other sectors of the economy, undermining the wages of still more workers.”

Such a vast project of political economy is far too complex for four middle-aged children of wealth and the 84-year-old matriarch, Helen. The family’s immediate personal ambitions are more modest: to destroy public education in the United States. To that end the Waltons, through their Walton Family Foundation and in close collaboration with Milwaukee’s Bradley Foundation, literally invented the national school “choice” network and its wedge issue-weapon, vouchers.

It is the existence of the school vouchers “movement” that allows the Bush administration to savage and massively disrupt the nation’s public schools while positing “alternative” forms of education, both vouchers and charter schools that often operate very much like public-funded private schools. “Choice” has become national policy under Bush’s Department of Education, which has doled out more than $75 million to organizations birthed by the Waltons, Bradley and their allies. (See “Funding a Movement” by People for the American Way, www.pfaw.org.)

Public education’s defenders, already outgunned by the combined resources of the right-wing political funding network plus the full weight of the Republican executive branch, now await the deluge: an infusion of $20 billion into the Walton’s private philanthropy, most of it earmarked for education “reform”—the euphemism for school privatization. At the usual rate of foundation disbursement, this would translate as $1 billion a year—a tidal wave of money, enough to reinvent the voucher “movement” many times over.


This would move them into the lofty ranks of Carnegie and Rockefeller in terms of a positive investment in education in America.

Posted by Orrin Judd at March 31, 2004 9:59 PM
Comments

$1 billion a year? Can that offset the teachers' unions?

Posted by: jsmith at March 31, 2004 10:16 PM

Just wait. Their grandchildren will be running another Ford Foundation and the people at In These Times will love them for being progressive as they spread the wealth around.

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at March 31, 2004 11:35 PM

The American left's hysteria over school vouchers is quite funny. I live in the junior member state of the Axis of Weasels (you know, the one with the chocolates). There's much in this country that's very wrong, but the schools work just fine with a system that's roughly equivalent to school vouchers.

There are public schools in Belgium, but a majority of the pupils attends private (mainly catholic) schools which are subsidized per pupil by the goverment. The quality of education is much better in those schools. The difference is that parents don't get an actual voucher to pay the school, but the schools get their money from the government when they proof the enrollment of the pupil.

We've had this system for many decades now and as far as I can tell, the sky didn't come down. Yeah, I know, there are a number of idiots in the cabinet, but they all graduated from public schools and universities. Militant secularists like them don't go to private schools in this country, obviously to their detriment.

Posted by: Peter at April 1, 2004 2:03 AM

Thanks for that interesting information, Peter. Learn something new every day.

Posted by: Paul Cella at April 1, 2004 7:44 AM

Wal-Mart is more than just a participant in the low-wage economy: It is the most important single beneficiary of that economy."

Wait a second. I thought I was the most important single beneficiary of the low-wage economy. Grocery prices in this town dropped about ten percent when Walmart opened up a couple of months ago. Now if we can just afford private school when our daugter turns five in a couple of years.

Posted by: Jason Johnson at April 1, 2004 9:49 AM

You will once they open Wal-Schools...

Posted by: oj at April 1, 2004 10:01 AM

And that isn't a joke - if the charter school experiment proves successful in Michigan, you'll hear more from the educational corporations that run them ... and bigger players could enter that picture as well.

Who says that private schools HAVE to be the province of conversatives and traditional-values types? Certainly the Sierra Club or the NEA could operate a charter school; if it succeeds they'd have more of a leg to stand on about the efficacy of their ideas. And if it fails, they'd at least gain first-hand knowledge of the marginality of those ideas.

Posted by: John Barrett Jr. at April 1, 2004 11:29 AM

And if it fails, they'd at least gain first-hand knowledge of the marginality of those ideas.

Wanna bet?

Posted by: Mike Earl at April 1, 2004 12:37 PM

From a Wal-Mart perspective, and educated consumer is a better consumer?

Posted by: john at April 1, 2004 1:32 PM

Better hurry, if you get your way with China, you'll be able to buy Wal-Mart stock with rapsodinks.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at April 2, 2004 12:49 AM
« NONES ON THE RUN: | Main | PRIORITIZING: »