March 20, 2004
REVISIONISM?:
Civil War Still Haunts Spanish Politics (ANTONIO FEROS, 3/20/04, NY Times)
That the civil war should remain a searing political reference point more than 25 years after democracy was established is not as odd as may at first seem. Some of Spain's main political parties, including the Socialist, the Communist and some nationalist parties, played substantial roles before and during the civil war, and analysts believe that their ideologies, tactics and goals have not changed substantially since then.The Popular Party did not exist during the civil war, but it was originally founded in the late 1970's by Manuel Fraga Iribarne, a minister of Francisco Franco during the 1960's; and on occasion it has been regarded as the offspring of Francoist ideology and tactics. Therefore, to understand the real intentions of each political party, the argument goes, one must look at what happened before and during the civil war.
Yet just what happened during that period — when 300,000 people died in action, 400,000 were forced into exile and another 400,000 were imprisoned by Francoists during and after the war — has become the subject of increasingly bitter dispute.
Pío Moa, a journalist and historian, is probably the best known of the recent crop of revisionists. His several books on the Republic (1931-1936) and the civil war have been enormously popular. "Los Mitos de la Guerra Civil" ("The Myths of the Civil War"), published last year, sold more than 100,000 copies in a few months. In it Mr. Moa systematically questions the main thesis accepted by a majority of Spanish historians: that Franco overthrew the democratically elected government. In the words of Stanley Payne, a historian at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, Mr. Moa disputes "the notion that leftist politics under the Republic were inherently democratic and constitutionalist and the idea that the civil war was the product of a long-standing conspiracy by wealthy reactionaries rather than a desperate response to stop a revolutionary process that had largely destroyed constitutional government."
In addition, Mr. Moa maintains that Franco's victory saved Spain from the trauma of revolution and territorial fragmentation, and that his regime — supported by a majority of Spaniards — helped modernize Spain and provided the conditions on which to build today's democratic system.
Isn't that obvious? Posted by Orrin Judd at March 20, 2004 9:36 AM
It will never be obvious to the Stalinist dreamers.
The myths of the Spanish civil war are as fixed as the myths about Alger Hiss, the myths about the veterans being killed on the Mall, and the myths about the Tet offensive.
Posted by: jim hamlen at March 20, 2004 11:41 AMthe myths about the veterans being killed on the Mall
That's a new one to me! What's that one about?
Of course, these days the preeminent political myth in America seems to be that Bush "stole" Florida in 2000.
Posted by: PapayaSF at March 20, 2004 3:39 PMPapaya:
The Bonus March episode in 1932. While I am no expert, even Paul Johnson calls it one of the most lied about and exploited events in American history, although it should be noted that the principal Army officers involved (other than perhaps MacArthur) wanted to sweep the whole thing away.
Posted by: jim hamlen at March 20, 2004 10:38 PM