March 8, 2004

RED>BLUE>BROWN:

Hispanic Nation: Hispanics are an immigrant group like no other. Their huge numbers are challenging old assumptions about assimilation. Is America ready? (Business Week, 3/15/04)

It boils down to this: How much will Hispanics change America, and how much will America change them? Throughout the country's history, successive waves of immigrants eventually surrendered their native languages and cultures and melted into the middle class. It didn't always happen right away. During the great European migrations of the 1800s, Germans settled in an area stretching from Pennsylvania to Minnesota. They had their own schools, newspapers, and businesses, and spoke German, says Demetrios G. Papademetriou, co-founder of the Migration Policy Institute in Washington. But in a few generations, their kids spoke only English and embraced American aspirations and habits.

Hispanics may be different, and not just because many are nonwhites. True, Maria Velazquez worries that her boys may lose their Spanish and urges them to speak it more. Even so, Hispanics today may have more choice than other immigrant groups to remain within their culture. With national TV networks such as Univision Communications Inc. (UVN ) and hundreds of mostly Spanish-speaking enclaves like Cicero, Hispanics may find it practical to remain bilingual. Today, 78% of U.S. Latinos speak Spanish, even if they also know English, according to the Census Bureau.

The 21 million Mexicans among them also have something else no other immigrant group has had: They're a car ride away from their home country. Many routinely journey back and forth, allowing them to maintain ties that Europeans never could. The dual identities are reinforced by the constant influx of new Latino immigrants -- roughly 400,000 a year, the highest flow in U.S. history. The steady stream of newcomers will likely keep the foreign-born, who typically speak mostly or only Spanish, at one-third of the U.S. Hispanic population for several decades. Their presence means that "Spanish is constantly refreshed, which is one of the key contrasts with what people think of as the melting pot," says Roberto Suro, director of the Pew Hispanic Center, a Latino research group in Washington.

A slow pace of assimilation is likely to hurt Hispanics themselves the most, especially poor immigrants who show up with no English and few skills. Latinos have long lagged in U.S. schools, in part because many families remain cloistered in Spanish-speaking neighborhoods. Their strong work ethic can compound the problem by propelling many young Latinos into the workforce before they finish high school. So while the Hispanic high-school-graduation rate has climbed 12 percentage points since 1980, to 57%, that's still woefully short of the 88% for non-Hispanic whites and 80% for African Americans.

The failure to develop skills leaves many Hispanics trapped in low-wage service jobs that offer few avenues for advancement. Incomes may not catch up anytime soon, either, certainly not for the millions of undocumented Hispanics. Most of these, from Mexican street-corner day laborers in Los Angeles to Guatemalan poultry-plant workers in North Carolina, toil in the underbelly of the U.S. economy. Many low-wage Hispanics would fare better economically if they moved out of the barrios and assimilated into U.S. society. Most probably face less racism than African Americans, since Latinos are a diverse ethnic and linguistic group comprising every nationality from Argentinians, who have a strong European heritage, to Dominicans, with their large black population. Even so, the pull of a common language may keep many in a country apart.

Certainly immigrants often head for a place where they can get support from fellow citizens, or even former neighbors. Some 90% of immigrants from Tonatico, a small town 100 miles south of Mexico City, head for Waukegan, Ill., joining 5,000 Tonaticans already there. In Miami, of course, Cubans dominate. "Miami has Hispanic banks, Hispanic law firms, Hispanic hospitals, so you can more or less conduct your entire life in Spanish here," says Leopoldo E. Guzman, 57. He came to the U.S. from Cuba at 15 and turned a Columbia University degree into a job at Lazard Frères & Co. before founding investment bank Guzman & Co.

Or take the Velazquezes' home of Cicero, a gritty factory town that once claimed fame as Al Capone's headquarters. Originally populated mostly by Czechs, Poles, and Slovaks, the Chicago suburb started decaying in the 1970s as factories closed and residents fled in search of jobs. Then a wave of young Mexican immigrants drove the population to its current Hispanic dominance, up from 1% in 1970. Today, the town president, equivalent to a mayor, is a Mexican immigrant, Ramiro Gonzalez, and Hispanics have replaced whites in the surviving factories and local schools. It's still possible that Cicero's Latino children will follow the path of so many other immigrants and move out into non-Hispanic neighborhoods. If they do, they, or at least their children, will likely all but abandon Spanish, gradually marry non-Hispanics, and meld into the mainstream.

But many researchers and academics say that's not likely for many Hispanics. In fact, a study of assimilation and other factors shows that while the number of Hispanics who prefer to speak mostly Spanish has dipped in recent years as the children of immigrants grow up with English, there has been no increase in those who prefer only English. Instead, the HispanTelligence study found that the group speaking both languages has climbed six percentage points since 1995, to 63%, and is likely to jump to 67% by 2010.

The trend to acculturate rather than assimilate is even more stark among Latino youth. Today, 97% of Mexican kids whose parents are immigrants and 76% of other Hispanic immigrant children know Spanish, even as nearly 90% also speak English very well, according to a decade-long study by University of California at Irvine sociologist Rubén G. Rumbaut. More striking, those Latino kids keep their native language at four times the rate of Filipino, Vietnamese, or Chinese children of immigrants. "Before, immigrants tried to become Americans as soon as possible," says Sergio Bendixen, founder of Bendixen & Associates, a polling firm in Coral Gables, Fla., that specializes in Hispanics. "Now, it's the opposite." [...]

For more than 200 years, the nation has succeeded in weaving the foreign-born into the fabric of U.S. society, incorporating strands of new cultures along the way. With their huge numbers, Hispanics are adding all kinds of new influences. Cinco de Mayo has joined St. Patrick's Day as a public celebration in some neighborhoods, and burritos are everyday fare. More and more, Americans hablan Español. Will Hispanics be absorbed just as other waves of immigrants were? It's possible, but more likely they will continue to straddle two worlds, figuring out ways to remain Hispanic even as they become Americans.


The other thing that Hispanics face, which no other immigrant group did, is an America where approximately half the population no longer believes in Western ideals generally nor in the American experiment specifically.

Leo Strauss puts the matter well in his Introduction to The City and Man, though he was then focussed on external dangers more than internal:

However much the power of the West may have declined, however great the dangers to the West may be, that decline, that danger, nay, the defeat, even the destruction of the West would not necessarily prove that the West is in a crisis: the West could go down in honor, certain of its purpose. The crisis of the West consists in the West's having become uncertain of its purpose. The West was once certain of its purpose--of a purpose in which all men could be united, and hence it had a clear vision of its future as the future of mankind. We do no longer have that certainty and that clarity. Some among us even despair of the future, and this despair explains many forms of contemporary Western degradation.

The multiculturalism and political correctness of the Left is just such a degradation. But on the Right, rather than fighting against the Left to restore the Western purpose, the hard fight which must be won, many are content merely to fight immigrants from Mexico, an easy fight, without honor, which is entirely secondary to the true culture war. The Hispanicizing of America is an effect, not a cause, of our cultural decline and, in the long run, may well be the best hope for eventual renaissance, just as the Islamicization of Europe may be its only chance for remoralization.

Posted by Orrin Judd at March 8, 2004 7:31 PM
Comments

If you're not careful Orrin, Shadia Drury's going to blacklist you.

Posted by: kevin whited at March 8, 2004 7:52 PM

I find it hard to take Strauss' gloomy diatribe about the decline of the West very seriously. Our democratic and individualist ideals are stronger in the world now than they ever were. Our ideals have triumphed in two World wars and one Cold war.

He is also too optimistic about the past. What period is he speaking of when he says "The West was once certain of its purpose -- of a purpose in which all men could be united"? The Reformation? The Hundred Years War? The Civil War? The West has had periods of optimism and purpose, like the Renaissance and the Enlightenment, followed by periods of wrenching social and religious upheaval and war. Today is no different. I'd say we are entering a period of renewed optimism & purpose.

But that's just me. Granted, I haven't been to church lately to hear any sermons, so I'm probably out of touch with how bad the state of the world really is.

Posted by: Robert Duquette at March 9, 2004 2:22 AM

The BusinessWeek article was a bit pessimistic about Latino assimilation.

What's wrong with 67% of Latino youth being able to speak Spanish, if 90% can also speak English ?
That seems more of an asset than a liability.

The high school graduation rate for the children of immigrants is 83%, similar to the listed rates of whites, at 88%, and blacks, at 80%.
Comparing the dropout rates of immigrant Latinos to native whites and blacks is apples-to-oranges, especially since those youth who didn't graduate Mexican high school, and don't enroll in American schools, are counted as "drop-outs".

Posted by: Michael Herdegen at March 9, 2004 2:55 AM

Robert:

What West? Europe is over. We're all that's left. You just happen to live in the one Christian outpost, even if an embattled one.

Posted by: oj at March 9, 2004 7:43 AM

"What West. Europe is over."

The Orcs have taken Osgiliath...

Posted by: Ken at March 9, 2004 12:23 PM

The part of the article about Waukegan, Illinois is interesting. My daughter just finished playing in a Catholic girl's fifth grade basketball league and about three quarters of our games were played at Immaculate Conception (IC) in Waukegan.

Many of the IC players were clearly Mexican immigrants of Indian origin. Most of the IC girls were kind of short by comparison with our home grown American giants, yet there they were playing basketball the quintessential American game for all it was worth. They dive for balls and fight for rebounds just like all our "American" girls with the Irish last names. Their parents were manning the concession area, just as we did for our home games.

After innumerable successive waves of immigrants have been successfully incorporated as Americans, I'm finding it a little difficult to get too fired up for the latest bought of nativism.

And frankly, as a traditional Catholic, I appreciate the reinforcements. And, oh yeah, one of my daughters two best friends has parents from Mexico (dad) and Venezuela (mom) and she chats with all the workers at the Waukegan Dunkin Donuts and everywhere else when we stop and eat together.

It's a little hard to feel as though Mexicans are aliens who are eager to undermine your society when they go to your school, church, cut your grass and serve your meals. In due time, they'll marry your kids, teach your grandkids, hire you and just generally inhabit this nation as completely as we do.

Then there won't be any more controversy about their right to do so once they've contributed their blood in service of our country and have labored to make themselves a place of their own here together with us.

Just give it another generation or two.

Posted by: Ray Clutts at March 9, 2004 4:20 PM

OJ, it is hard to imagine that the West ever came to prominence if such dreary pessimism as yours were the norm in the culture. Luckily, it wasn't. Whatever periods you see as the West's golden age were certainly beset with more challenges than what we have to deal with today.

Posted by: Robert Duquette at March 9, 2004 10:57 PM

Robert:

When has the culture ever despised itself so much that it relentlessly exterminated its own children, for no more reason than that they're inconvenient?

Posted by: oj at March 9, 2004 11:12 PM

OJ, culturally sanctioned murder has been part of Western culture in many forms in the past. Infanticide was not always uncommon. I agree with you that widespread, elective abortion for convenience poses a grave threat to our culture. I am not so much praising our present as I am discounting the greatness of our past. It is too easy when facing the injustices of the present to slip into an unjustified worship of past generations, and to over-value their accomplishments as compared to our own.

Posted by: Robert Duquette at March 10, 2004 10:02 PM

Robert:

When was infanticide common in Western culture?

Posted by: oj at March 10, 2004 10:50 PM
« A LIGHT IN ASIA: | Main | SHAKEDOWN STREET: »