March 18, 2004
NOT FAIR TO MODO:
Both of them are fairly unreadable nowadays, but here are consecurtive entries in the NY Times newsletter today:
Axis of Appeasement
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
The notion that Spain can separate itself from Al Qaeda's
onslaught on Western civilization by pulling its troops
from Iraq is a fantasy.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/18/opinion/18FRIE.html
Pride and Prejudice
By MAUREEN DOWD
The Republicans prefer to paint our old ally as craven
rather than accept the Spanish people's judgment ˜ that the
Iraq takeover had nothing to do with the war on terror.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/18/opinion/18DOWD.html
Kind of cruel of the editors to juxtapose Ms Dowd, their resident expert on Sex and the City and such pop trivialities, with their foreign policy guru.
I wrote Mr. Okrent of the NYT after Ms. Dowd a particularly egregious comment about our Iraq war coalition of "poodles and lackeys." His reply was basically, it's opinion.
Posted by: Rick T. at March 18, 2004 10:19 AMOne could make the argument that terrorism post-invasion (hitting an American ally, Spain) is different from terrorism pre-invasion (no Iraqi connection).
I don't accept that last part, but it certainly is the mainstream line of the left.
Posted by: old maltese at March 18, 2004 11:59 AMI dunno if Thomas Friedman is readable, but he's been knowledgeable and persuasive when appearing on television.
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at March 18, 2004 12:03 PMWhy should we accept their judgement? They don't accept ours, why should we accept theirs?
This reminds me of the usual pomo gibberish: There are no facts, merely opinions, and one persons opinion is as right as any other persons.
I suspect Dowd will not be with the Times much longer now that Krugman has usurped her role as humour columnist.
Posted by: Carter at March 18, 2004 3:05 PM