February 18, 2004

THE BLUE BATTLEGROUND:

Bush Leads in Red States, Kerry Ahead in Blue States Voters Hardened on the Economy, War,  Gays Marriage (Zogby News, February 18, 2004)

A new poll conducted by Zogby International for The O’Leary Report and Southern Methodist University’s John Tower Center from February 12-15, 2004 of 1,209 likely voters with a margin of error of +/- 2.8 percentage points found that if the election for president were held today, Democrat John Kerry would edge George W. Bush 46% to 45% in the “blue states” – or states won by Al Gore in the 2000 election.  In the “red states,” or states won by George W. Bush in 2000, however, Bush wins handily by a 51% to 39% margin. [...]

A majority of voters in the survey also reject the filibuster strategy employed by Senate Democrats against some of President Bush’s judicial nominees.  This is consistent with polling results under President Clinton when voters rejected Republican efforts to block judicial nominees. Fifty-three percent of Blue State and 59% of Red State voters felt the Democratic filibuster of judicial nominees was wrong while 35% of Blue State and 32% of Red State voters feel a minority of Senators are right to use whatever means to necessary to block the nominees.

While the issue of gay marriages dominates the news in San Francisco and Boston, a majority of Americans remain opposed to the idea. Fifty-two percent of Red State voters and 50% of Blue State voters support such a constitutional amendment while 43% of Red State voters and 44% of Blue State voters disagree. Voters gave Bush a decided edge when asked who would do a better job of dealing with Al Qaeda, Saddam Hussein, Moammar Gaddafi, North Korea and Iran.  Bush was the clear choice among Red State voters (53%) and Blue State votes (47%).  Only 31% of Red State voters and 35% of Blue State voters felt Kerry would do a better job in dealing with rogue states and leaders.


The election is over, only the magnitude of the landslide is at issue. Three more quarters of good economic news and the draw-down in Iraq will put Democrats on the defensive in all of Blue America while Red America is out of play.


N.B.--Interesting to note that it is not America generally that is evenly divided but Blue America that is.

Posted by Orrin Judd at February 18, 2004 2:24 PM
Comments

not to mention the Pakistan spring offensive ..

Posted by: Jon Brennan at February 18, 2004 2:42 PM

I am more partial to a Bekaa Valley Summer Bash myself...

Posted by: Vea Victis at February 18, 2004 3:07 PM

Let's see, Zogby showed Kerry by 27 points in WI.

And I'm supposed to believe it now??

Posted by: Sandy P. at February 18, 2004 3:26 PM

I can't wait for this years Bro Judd election picking contest. Is it too early to put Bush down for 50 states?

Posted by: BJW at February 18, 2004 3:46 PM

I guess John couldn't bring himself to give the overall numbers, because they seem to show a Bush lead of five points or so.

It's also funny to read his Wisconsin poll results on his site's home page.

Posted by: Casey Abell at February 18, 2004 4:39 PM

What if Edwards is the nominee?

Posted by: Jana at February 18, 2004 4:48 PM

The result I find most striking is that feelings about gay marriage are almost identical in the red and blue states.

I don't know which is more surprising, the 50% support for the FMA in the blue states, or the 43% opposition in the red.

Posted by: ralph phelan at February 18, 2004 5:00 PM

So what were the respective numbers in 2000? I assume that Bush won the 30 red states by a smaller percentage, and Gore won the 20 blue states by a larger percentage. If Kerry is barely ahead in the blue states overall, and that presumably includes large leads in CA and NY, he must be getting crushed in the rest of blue country.

Posted by: brian at February 18, 2004 5:48 PM

. . . the Pakistan spring offensive . . . a Bekaa Valley Summer Bash . . .

How about the September invasion of the Arabian Peninsula . . . Operation Desert Vengeance.

Posted by: Mike Morley at February 18, 2004 7:08 PM

Similar to Brian's point - it would be interesting to see the state by state breakdown (didn't want to pay for the Zogby report). I wonder if huge leads by Bush in some states (i.e. Dakotas, Wyoming, Utah) is masking much closer spread in more important states (Ohio, Florida). The same is true for the Blue states - as Brian notes sizeable Dem leads in CA, NY, CT could be masking Bush leading in other blue states.

Posted by: AWW at February 18, 2004 10:22 PM

check out realclearpolitics.org(?) or .com can't remember.

Posted by: Sandy P. at February 19, 2004 12:35 AM
« WHICH REPUBLIC DOES HE WANT TO LEAD? (via ef brown): | Main | RHYMES WITH "SHORE OF TRIPOLI": »