February 27, 2004

MORE REPUBLICAN SMEAR TACTICS:

Kerry rated most liberal member of Senate (Richard E. Cohen, February 27, 2004, National Journal)

The results of the [National Journal's congressional vote ratings] show that Kerry was the most liberal senator in 2003, with a composite liberal score of 96.5. But Edwards wasn't far behind: He had a 2003 composite liberal score of 94.5, making him the fourth-most-liberal senator. [...]

Last year, Kerry, Edwards, and other congressional Democrats who were seeking the presidency, including Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Rep. Dick Gephardt of Missouri, missed many votes. To qualify for a score in National Journal's vote ratings, members must participate in at least half of the votes in an issue category. Of the 62 Senate votes used to compute the 2003 ratings, Kerry was absent for 37 votes and Edwards missed 22.

As a result, in the 2003 vote ratings, Kerry received a rating only in the economic policy category, earning a perfect liberal score. Edwards received ratings in the categories of economic and social issues, also putting up perfect liberal scores.

A separate analysis showed that of the votes that Kerry cast in the two categories in which he did not receive scores in 2003 -- social policy and foreign policy -- he consistently took the liberal view within the Senate. Edwards did not receive a score in the foreign-policy category; he sided with the liberals on five votes in that area, and with the conservatives on one vote. On foreign policy, Kerry and Edwards -- both of whom supported the 2002 resolution authorizing the use of military force against Iraq -- last year joined most Senate Democrats in voting that half of the U.S. reconstruction aid to Iraq be provided as loans, a provision that ultimately was dropped.

To be sure, Kerry's ranking as the No. 1 Senate liberal in 2003 -- and his earning of similar honors three times during his first term, from 1985 to 1990 -- will probably have opposition researchers licking their chops. As shown in the accompanying chart, Kerry had a perfect liberal rating on social issues during 10 of the 18 years in which he received a score, meaning that he did not side with conservatives on a single vote in those years. That included his 1996 vote, with 13 other Senate Democrats, against the Defense of Marriage Act, which prohibited federal recognition of states' same-sex marriage laws.


If you want to run for president from Congress you have to place yourself at one of the extreme margins of American politics or else your opponents in the party primary will clobber you with your heretical votes. Of course, once you get the nomination and your opponent is from the other party, he'll use those same votes to destroy you.

Posted by Orrin Judd at February 27, 2004 11:51 PM
Comments

Checks and balances.

Posted by: jim hamlen at February 28, 2004 8:37 AM

Watch Kerry claim that the rating is incorrect because he didn't vote on many issues. To offset this the GOP can point to the historical record where he was most liberal earlier in his career.

Posted by: AWW at February 28, 2004 11:29 PM

AWW:

The "absentee senator" defense is unlikely.

Posted by: oj at February 28, 2004 11:44 PM

Gee, I suppose he should have been in the capitol actually representing his constituents.

It's sad that we've forgotten that we live in a representative republic.

Posted by: Matt at March 2, 2004 1:37 PM
« NOT A FACTUAL ASSESSMENT?: | Main | THE OPPRESSED MR. BLIX »