February 5, 2004
DIVIDED:
Lead, Don't Divide: "I am saddened that Vietnam has yet again been inserted into the campaign." (JOHN F. KERRY, February 5, 2004, Wall Street Journal)
(Editor's note: Sen. Kerry delivered this speech on the Senate floor Feb. 27, 1992. The previous day, Sen. Bob Kerrey, a Vietnam veteran and candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, spoke in Atlanta, where he criticized fellow candidate Bill Clinton for his lack of military service during Vietnam.)Mr. President, I also rise today--and I want to say that I rise reluctantly, but I rise feeling driven by personal reasons of necessity--to express my very deep disappointment over yesterday's turn of events in the Democratic primary in Georgia.
I am saddened by the fact that Vietnam has yet again been inserted into the campaign, and that it has been inserted in what I feel to be the worst possible way. By that I mean that yesterday, during this presidential campaign, and even throughout recent times, Vietnam has been discussed and written about without an adequate statement of its full meaning.
What is ignored is the way in which our experience during that period reflected in part a positive affirmation of American values and history, not simply the more obvious negatives of loss and confusion.
What is missing is a recognition that there exists today a generation that has come into its own with powerful lessons learned, with a voice that has been grounded in experiences both of those who went to Vietnam and those who did not.
What is missing and what cries out to be said is that neither one group nor the other from that difficult period of time has cornered the market on virtue or rectitude or love of country.
What saddens me most is that Democrats, above all those who shared the agonies of that generation, should now be refighting the many conflicts of Vietnam in order to win the current political conflict of a presidential primary.
The race for the White House should be about leadership, and leadership requires that one help heal the wounds of Vietnam, not reopen them; that one help identify the positive things that we learned about ourselves and about our nation, not play to the divisions and differences of that crucible of our generation.
We do not need to divide America over who served and how.
The Senator is wrong, of course. Vietnam was one of the most important questions that faced his generation and whether you served or not and whether you supported winning the war or instead leaving the South to the tender mercies of the North are vitally important questions still. Complicity in the murder and misery we left behind and causing the bloody struggles of the boat people won't go away as easily as medals tossed over a fence. Posted by Orrin Judd at February 5, 2004 11:12 AM
Orrin, you've missed the point entirely. What the haughty, French-looking Massachusetts Democrat was saying was that we should not mention Vietnam when the mention of Vietnam is detrimental to the Democratic Party's annointed front-runner/nominee. When mentioning Vietnam is helpful to the annointed front-runner/nominee, or detrimental to his opponents, all bets are off.
Posted by: Mike Morley at February 5, 2004 11:54 AMAh, I get it. So selling the South down the Red river doesn't count because he did it?
Posted by: oj at February 5, 2004 11:58 AMExactly.
Posted by: Mike Morley at February 5, 2004 12:14 PMNow, now, oj. Don't you know the Vietnamese were nobly fighting for their freedom, and the only South Vietnamese who had anything to fear were those who had worked for the Americans? At least that's what my father-in-law told me...
Posted by: brian at February 5, 2004 1:24 PMbrian:
Did he tell you it was okay to leave those Vietnamese behind to die? Yikes!
Posted by: oj at February 5, 2004 1:32 PMoj:
I just shook my head and walked away. He's a tired old man who is still living in his 1960's era leftist fantasy world. He also told me that he and his friends threw a big party when Nixon resigned, and laments that people are not so politically aware these days (otherwise, why would Republicans be doing so well?). I wanted to ask him if he also had a party when Saigon fell, but didn't feel like causing a scene.
Posted by: brian at February 5, 2004 4:00 PMI am hoping that the R's run commercials of Kerry arguing with himself.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 6, 2004 12:57 AM