December 5, 2003
PESTS WITH PELTS:
The Return of the Wild: Suburbanites must learn to kill again. (GEOFFREY NORMAN, December 5, 2003, Wall Street Journal)
[A]nimals have made a remarkable comeback, and they are not likely to quit breeding. There is no way to negotiate with them, and they cannot be regulated. Deer will devour the expensive landscaping and bears will get into birdfeeders, kill pets, and pull off the occasional breaking and entering. It's their nature. There may be technological fixes out there in the future, but for now the solution to the problem of too many animals seems simply to be--killing them.Ah, there is the rub, if not the rub-out. People seem to love nature and want to get close to it. But they don't want to share it, and when it comes to control, they don't want to get their hands dirty. They are unwilling to look nature in its brutal and uncompromising face. Some communities have hired "sharpshooters" to thin deer herds. The idea seems to be that it isn't the killing that is the problem. It is that it is being done by amateurs. One recalls Dr. Johnson's crack about the people who opposed bear baiting not because it gave pain to the animal but because it gave pleasure to the people. A deer that is assassinated by a "sharpshooter" is just as dead as one shot by a hunter. Who, by the way, paid a license fee and tax on his gun and ammunition.
The thrill of the hunt is, of course, not for everyone. And attitudes about hunting can be complex. I wondered for a long time if I could kill a bear. This was back when I had never seen one and didn't expect to. I have seen many in recent years. The first was no more than 30 steps away, looking at me with curious and intelligent eyes. Its pelt was deep and rich, and its movements were graceful and fluid. I could have raised my bow and easily put an arrow through its heart. But I merely watched while the animal took a few steps and then seemed to vanish, like smoke, in the woods.
I couldn't kill that bear, but I don't have a problem with the New Jersey hunt. The many people who do may well possess an ethical refinement that simply escapes me, but I fear that some may possess instead a de-natured sense of nature. They build into nature, they live nearby it, they thrill at its beauty and diversity and consider themselves sensitive environmentalists who want to shield nature from the harm that humans do. But they do not know it. They have only a distanced, sentimentalized sense of nature, very much the product of city-centered, suburban modern life, so far from rural realities that earlier generations knew so well. There was a time that you'd be considered a complete fool not to kill the bears that are invading your backyard. Maybe you still are.
All it takes is one time seeing the deer you just hit coming at you through your windshield, or one enormous moose in the middle of the highway, and they start to seem like vermin. It's estimated that there are more deer in places like NH now than there were when we got to the New World. That's too many. Posted by Orrin Judd at December 5, 2003 7:34 PM
Geese. I'd rather have my local parks infested with rats than these foul fowl. Problem is, you can't kill them without having some elaborate program to feed them to the homeless or something. My upstate NY relatives just shoot them if they land on their property.
Posted by: Jerome Howard at December 5, 2003 8:09 PMThe only reason I can think of to use sharpshooters instead of (amateur) hunters is the risk of nailing a citizen instead of a deer. It's one thing to hunt in a reserve / park, another to do so in suburban back yards.
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at December 5, 2003 8:27 PMA couple of times a year we get bears in our back yard. Once in a while it's been a mom with a cub, once the bear came right up on our deck.
Unfortunately, animal husbandry policy in Massachusetts has been made by referenda the last few years, which means it's made by people living in and around Boston who rarely if ever see deer, let alone the bear, foxes, wild turkeys and cayotes we also get.
Posted by: David Cohen at December 5, 2003 8:47 PMTwenty years ago, a huge concern in Arctic Canada was the caribou herds. They had "dwindled" to a couple of million. Development was frozen, endless studies were done and a whole activist industry was born worrying about the smelly, fly-bitten things (Nobody could actually do anything because they were wild, inaccessible herds and surprisingly difficult to find).
Then, in the mid-eighties, the caribou population started to rise dramatically. You have never seen so many disappointed people in your lives.
Posted by: Peter B at December 5, 2003 8:59 PMOne of the more difficult to write news stories I ever got near was a dispute between the head of the school board, Fred Smith, and the superintendent of education, Ferd Smith, which led to Fred firing Ferd.
Fortunately, before this could go any further, Ferd, driving down a country road to a job interview, ran into an 8-point buck, which came through the windshield, one tine piercing Ferd in the heart and ending the controversy right there.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at December 5, 2003 9:17 PMMost people fail to consider that when you go somewhere to get closer to Nature, Nature is also getting closer to you.
No where is that demonstrated better than in the pages of an REI catalog, where you can find everything one needs to simultaneously go deep into Nature while experiencing as little of it as possible.
Posted by: Raoul Ortega at December 5, 2003 10:47 PMWell, do you all hunt? Or just complain about the deer infestation and do nothing about it?
Posted by: BretW at December 6, 2003 1:38 AMA friend of mine was driving on a Finnish highway and rounded a curve to find an elk in his path. Like moose, the animals stand just high enough that all their body mass comes right into your windshield -- the bumper and engine compartment just takes their legs out. The animal tore the roof out and a sharp metal edge struck his wife in the head, killing her. The kids were in the back seat.
Bret - I don't hunt. I stop and let my wife take pictures.
Posted by: pj at December 6, 2003 8:11 AMBret --
I live in Northampton, Massachusetts. Hunting is probably the only death penalty offense I could get my neighbors to agree on. In any event, I don't mind the deer (we don't have a garden). It is, however, amusing that my wife grew up in far Northwestern Montana thinking of the east coast as a single urboplex from boston to DC and never saw anything like the number of bears we see in the average summer.
Posted by: David Cohen at December 6, 2003 9:53 AMI just avoided three deer on the road last night on the way back from seeing "The Last Samurai" (save your money). There is no hunting shame in Minnesota, althouth there are a few animal rights cranks in the Twin Cities who even think that catch and release for geese unduly traumatizes their fragile sensibilities (the geese's, not the people's).
On a trip back from Duluth in June we stopped counting dead deer at 35, and had to stop or slow down to avoid hitting the live ones at leas 10 times.
Posted by: Robert D at December 6, 2003 1:52 PMI live just 25 miles north of Detroit. There are so many deer around here it is nearly like the plains of the Serengetti.
A half mile to the east is a large county park. Last weekend it was closed due to "Deer Management." Read "Bambi Blasting." The county government pays specialists to do what they charge hunters to do elsewhere.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at December 6, 2003 7:50 PM