December 1, 2003

MASTERS OF THE CONGRESS:

. . . And Mischief (Norman J. Ornstein, November 26, 2003, Washington Post )

One of the most disgraceful moments in American sports came in the 1972 Olympics, when officials gave the Soviet Union's basketball team three chances to shoot the ball after the clock had apparently run out--allowing it to defeat the U.S. team.

American politics now has its own version of that infamous game. Early last Sunday, starting at about 3 a.m., the House of Representatives began its roll call on the Medicare prescription drug plan--the most significant vote of the year. The House votes by electronic device, with each vote normally taking 15 minutes. After the allotted time, the bill, supported by the president and the Republican leadership, was losing. The vote stayed open. Before long it became clear that an absolute majority of the House--218 of the 435 members--had voted no, with only 216 in favor. But the vote stayed open until Republicans were able to bludgeon two of their members to switch sides. It took two hours and 51 minutes, the longest roll call in modern House history.

This was not, technically speaking, against the rules. House Rule XX, clause 2 (a) says that there is a 15-minute minimum for most votes by electronic device. There is no formal maximum. A vote is not final until the vote numbers have been read by the speaker and the result declared. But since electronic voting began in January 1973, the norm has been long established and clear: Fifteen minutes is the voting time.


What makes these gripes so hilarious is that if LBJ had used such a tactic to pass an entitlement program it would be considered a legendary pinnacle in the annals of the Left. Put the shoe on the other foot and the Republic is in danger.

Posted by Orrin Judd at December 1, 2003 10:07 AM
Comments

It's hilarious that they ADMIT no rules were actually broken, but then carp and complain. But it's okay completely to rewrite election rules in, say, Florida or New Jersey?!

While on the topic of "the norm," how about "the norm" of not filibustering judicial nominees? Ah, that "norm" is different, I guess.

Shoe on the other foot indeed.

Posted by: kevin whited at December 1, 2003 12:03 PM
« 60-40 FILES: | Main | THE REDDING OF AMERICA: »