December 16, 2003
I, GOREBOT:
Whopper: Howard Dean: Oh, that bizarre and irresponsible remark! (Timothy Noah, Dec. 13, 2003, Slate)
Scott Spradling, WMUR-TV: Governor Dean, you had once stated that you thought it was possible that the president of the United States had been forewarned about the 9/11 terrorist attacks. You later said that you didn't really know.A statement like that, don't you see the possibility of some Democrats being nervous about statements like that leading them to the conclusion that you are not right for being the next commander in chief?
Howard Dean: Well, in all due respect, I did not exactly state that.
—Exchange at the Democratic presidential debate in Durham, N.H., Dec. 9.Julie from Traverse City,* Mich.: [O]nce we get you in the White House, would you please make sure that there is a thorough investigation of 9/11, and not—
Dean: Yes.
Julie: —stonewall it?
Dean: There is a report which the president is suppressing evidence for which is a thorough investigation of 9/11.
Diane Rehm, WAMU (public) radio: Why do you think he's suppressing that report?
Dean: I don't know. There are many theories about it. The most interesting theory that I've heard so far, which is nothing more than a theory, I can't—think it can't be proved, is that he was warned ahead of time by the Saudis. Now, who knows what the real situation is, but the trouble is that by suppressing that kind of information, you lead to those kinds of theories, whether they have any truth to them or not, and then eventually they get repeated as fact. So I think the president is taking a great risk by suppressing the clear, the key information that needs to go to the Kean commission.
—Exchange on The Diane Rehm Show, on WAMU in Washington, Dec. 1.
Discussion. In answering Spradling at the New Hampshire debate, Dean failed to acknowledge his Diane Rehm Show appearance, in which he introduced the bizarre and irresponsible accusation that Bush got advance warning about 9/11 (ostensibly as an example of the kind of speculation Bush lends credence to by not cooperating with the Kean commission). Dean's denial that he said what Spradling said he said is false and dishonest if you take the Diane Rehm appearance into account.
Now that Mr. Dean has become a stalking horse for Al Gore, you'd think the first thing he'd learn is the importance of not being seen to be a stranger to the truth. Posted by Orrin Judd at December 16, 2003 8:33 AM
oj, I think you're under attack by raging italicists.
Posted by: Barry Meislin at December 16, 2003 9:18 AMMr. Meislin;
Yes, that's a failing of our dear Mr. Judd. I can't tell you how difficult that kind of thing made porting over the archives. If he weren't such an inspiration, I'd be tempted to post some sort of post-modern self referential comment about it.
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at December 16, 2003 9:54 AMOh. I see.
Well, we love 'em for their faults....
Posted by: Barry Meislin at December 16, 2003 10:32 AMTo be honest, Gov. Dean did not state that 'it was possible that the president of the United States had been forewarned about the 9/11 terrorist attacks.'
He said, 'The most interesting theory that I've heard so far, which is nothing more than a theory, ...... '
There is a difference.
Noah should be more careful.
Posted by: old maltese at December 16, 2003 10:44 AMSo should Howard Dean.
Posted by: jim hamlen at December 16, 2003 11:54 AM