December 10, 2003
CROPS AND CIRCLES:
Circles for Space: German "Stonehenge" marks oldest observatory (Madhusree Mukerjee, 12/09/03, Scientific American)
A vast, shadowy circle sits in a flat wheat field near Goseck, Germany. No, it is not a pattern made by tipsy graduate students. The circle represents the remains of the world's oldest observatory, dating back 7,000 years. Coupled with an etched disk recovered last year, the observatory suggests that Neolithic and Bronze Age people measured the heavens far earlier and more accurately than scientists had imagined.Archaeologists reported the Goseck circle's identity and age this past August. First spotted by airplane, the circle is 75 meters wide. Originally, it consisted of four concentric circles--a mound, a ditch and two wooden palisades about the height of a person--in which stood three sets of gates facing southeast, southwest and north, respectively. On the winter solstice, someone at the center of the circles would see the sun rise and set through the southern gates.
Although aerial surveys have demarcated 200-odd similar circles scattered across Europe, the Goseck structure is the oldest and best preserved of the 20 excavated thus far, and it is the first circle whose function is evident. Though called the German Stonehenge, it precedes Stonehenge by at least two millennia. The linear designs on pottery shards found within the compound suggest that the observatory was built in 4900 B.C.
One of the necessary myths of multiculturalism, is that Western Europe must have been mankind's most backwards culture for some protracted period of time, this so that its eventual superiority can be dismissed as lucky or temporary or whatever. How many times have you heard the phrase: "The so-and-so people were engaging in rather advanced agriculture/mathematics/science/philosophy/architecture/whatever while Europeans were still savages in loincloths..."? Posted by Orrin Judd at December 10, 2003 9:42 AM
This is unsurprising. The discovery of the precession of the equinox (well known by Greek times) and the prediction of eclipses (the apparent purpose of Stonehedge) would have required thousands of years of diligent observation, recording, and calculation.
Posted by: jd watson at December 10, 2003 10:57 AMHow many times have you heard the phrase: "The so-and-so people were engaging in rather advanced agriculture/mathematics/science/philosophy/
architecture/whatever while Europeans were still savages in loincloths..."?
The irony that whatever primitive tribe they are promoting hasn't changed since that time always seems lost on the multiculti trotting out that cliche.
Posted by: Raoul Ortega at December 10, 2003 10:57 AMMy favorite is from a Polish Jewish friend who enjoys stating in good humor: "My ancestors were kiting checks in Tel Aviv while yours were still painting their faces blue."
Posted by: Genecis at December 10, 2003 1:02 PMGenecis:
Tel Aviv was founded about 100 years ago. The original quip was Disraeli's. My ancestors were writing the Bible while yours were hoping around the forset covered only with blue paint.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at December 10, 2003 2:20 PMTurn on any random football game and chances are you'll see someone painted blue.
Posted by: David Cohen at December 10, 2003 2:38 PMNoticing the night sky, like riding a horse, is something any human can do.
Similar stone observatories are all over the High Plains of North America, built by societies that Orrin says are "crap."
Thankfully for Orrin's view of progress, Europeans understood less and less about the night sky the more Christian and civilized they became, until by 1600 they knew less than the savages of No. America.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at December 10, 2003 10:46 PMThey could steer their ships by it. How about the aboriginals? And what crops did they domesticate?
Posted by: oj at December 10, 2003 11:06 PMActually, Orrin, they couldn't. Only a tiny few. Most European sea captains used nothing but chip log, compass and portolan until about the mid-19th century.
As for domesticating crops, the Europeans domesticated rye, sort of by accident (it was a weed in wheat that they couldn't control, so they ate it). And possibly cabbage. That's all.
The aborginals domesticated corn, the world's most important single crop, pecans, squash, peppers, sunflower, tomatoes, potatoes, manioc, probably taro, sweet potato.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at December 11, 2003 2:15 AMHarry:
"..Europeans understood less and less about the night sky the more Christian and civilized they became, until by 1600 they knew less than the savages of No. America."
Until now I was unaware that the Indians had a heliocentric theory of the solar system (Copernicus), knew that Jupiter had moons and Venus had phases (Galileo), or knew that the planet's orbits were ellipses obeying certain laws relating period and distance from the sun and motion along the orbit (Kepler).
jd:
Humor him--it's just hatred of Christianity he's trying to vent.
Posted by: oj at December 11, 2003 8:24 AMCome on, dr. watson, read the post. I said until 1600.
Copernicus was afraid ot publish his heliocentric theory, the Jesuits denied the moons of Jupiter and Galileo was persecuted for speculating on the heavenly bodies.
The greatest intellect of the Christian age, Bellarmine, attacked all that new knowledge.
As I say, knowledge of the heavens in Europe declined steadily during the Christian era. Skeptics set it back on track, and 1600 was the turning point.
All that is true whatever I may think of Christianity.
Yeah, all the stuff about navigation and domestication applies up until around 800 and then the astronomy stuff until 1600. Get your hysterias right, jd.
Posted by: oj at December 11, 2003 1:54 PM1600 was also just after Davis invented the backstaff, at which point European celestial navigators finally caught up the Arabs, who had been using a credit card on a string -- a superior instrument to the backstaff -- for at least 800 years by then.
The European celestial navigators didn't come up with a superior instrument until the octant, early 1700s.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at December 11, 2003 4:23 PMWhich would explain why Arabic is spoken nowhere in the Western hemisphere?
Posted by: oj at December 11, 2003 5:21 PMYou wanna know the real reason Europe briefly took over the world, Orrin?
It had nothing to do with morality, organization or private property rights. It had to do with technology and just one small piece of that: the European sailing ship developed into an unsophisticated (compared to everywhere else) slug that was unsafe and unweatherly but made a superb gun platform.
The secret to exploring is not navigation. Any idiot can run into an island, they're all over the place. The secret to successful exploring is to be able to shoot your way back out.
The Chinese, who got farther earlier, didn't have good gun platforms, so they had to substitute infantry for cannon. The expedition to East Africa required 8,000 infantry. Even the emperor of China couldn't afford that, so they quit.
The Bugis, the Arabs, the Polynesians, the Melanesians and the Chinese all had better sailing vessels than the Europeans.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at December 11, 2003 8:14 PMDarnnit Harry. There you go again, clouding the issue with facts.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at December 12, 2003 7:29 AM