December 14, 2003
A HEART RIGHTLY POSITIONED:
Mutual Admiration and a Few Jokes: The Correspondence of Harry Truman with Groucho and Harpo Marx (Raymond H. Geselbracht, Spring 2001, Prologue)
President Harry S. Truman's improbable relationship with the zany Marx Brothers of vaudeville and movie fame began as a young man in Kansas City and extended into Truman's tenure in the White House and afterward. But it was not all jokes and laughs— by either the brothers or the thirty-third President— as correspondence in the files of the Harry S. Truman Presidential Library in Independence, Missouri, reveal.Harry Truman's association with the Marx Brothers began at some unrecorded time fairly early in Truman's life. From the time he was a young man in his teens, Truman loved vaudeville. He loved almost every kind of live theater, but his favorite was vaudeville. That meant that he went often to the Orpheum Theatre and the Grand Opera House in Kansas City. "Between the time I was about 16 to 20," Truman said when he was President, "I used to go to every vaudeville show that came to Kansas City at the old Orpheum, and at the Grand." He even ushered for a time at the Orpheum so he could get into the show for free. After he started courting Bess Wallace in 1910, he took her to the vaudeville shows.
The Marx Brothers started coming to Kansas City shortly after they moved to Chicago from New York in about 1910. Truman probably came in from the Grandview farm as often as he could to see them. He remembered many years later, when vaudeville was long gone and he was an old man, that he almost never missed a chance to see the Marx Brothers when they were in town.
When Truman became President in the spring of 1945, one of the first problems that came to him was what to do about the survivors of the Holocaust who were living in displaced persons camps in Europe. He had great sympathy with the displaced persons, and he issued a directive in late 1945 intended to allow some of them to immigrate to the United States. Among the many Americans who were concerned about the displaced persons and were following Truman's actions with regard to them was a former vaudevillian whom Truman certainly remembered. On October 8, 1946, Groucho Marx sent Truman a clipping of a Life magazine editorial, "Send Them Here! Europe's Refugees Need a Place to Go and America Needs to Set a World Example." The article claimed that Truman's attempt to help displaced persons to immigrate to the United States had failed. "In God's name[,]" the editorial concluded, "can we go on doing nothing about these DPs?" Groucho asked Truman to consider the article. "I am sure that you are deluged with mail of this sort," he wrote, "but even a president at times can be confused." He added a PS: "Despite all this I propose voting for you in 1948."
Truman responded by sending Groucho a copy of a letter he had recently sent to Senator Walter George of Georgia. "I sincerely wish that every member of the Congress could visit the displaced persons camps in Germany and Austria," Truman wrote, "and see just what is happening to Five Hundred Thousand human beings through no fault of their own." Truman thought if the members of Congress did witness the misery of the displaced persons, they might help him bring some of these people to the United States and find other homes for them. "Your ancestors and mine," Truman concluded, "came to this country to escape just such conditions. There is no place for people to go now unless we can arrange it." [...]
Truman felt the allure of the Marx Brother's zany view of life from the time he was a young man, and he never forgot or renounced it. His memories of the Marx Brothers' riotously irreverent attitude to authority and to all the people and institutions that embodied it might well have contributed to the remarkable humility that he maintained during all the time he held high office. His youthful encounter with the Marx Brothers certainly encouraged him to recognize, as he always did, that life, among its other mysteries, is fundamentally humorous.
For the Marx Brothers, on the other hand, Truman was the President whose heart was rightly positioned on the refugee issue after World War II and who recognized and supported Israel. Though it is not recorded in the correspondence in the Truman Library's holdings, they must have recognized that Truman felt strongly the need to bring social justice to all Americans and to bring what was best in American life to people all over the world. In any event, Groucho voted for Truman the only time he could, in 1948, and would have voted for him again; one thinks the same is true of Harpo.
Truman was obviously a terrible president, but, unlike some other terrible presidents (Wilson, LBJ, Nixon, etc.), one doesn't doubt that his heart was rightly positioned. Posted by Orrin Judd at December 14, 2003 10:00 AM
Truman wasn't terrible. His greatest strength - his down-to-earth common sense (coupled with his self-education), proved to be a problem when dealing with people like Louis Johnson and also with MacArthur. He avoided any dreamy foolishness that Roosevelt would have propagated after the war, but he failed to recognize the depth of the 'fifth column' problem.
Don't forget what Churchill said about him: "You, more than any other, have saved Western Civilization".
Posted by: jim hamlen at December 14, 2003 12:29 PMChurchill made the same mistakes, preserving the USSR and the Welfare State, hardly surprising he'd praise Truman.
Posted by: oj at December 14, 2003 12:35 PMChurchill was hardly in a position to do otherwise, given that England was bankrupt and exhausted. And if you think that American public opinion would have supported fighting the Soviets in 1945 or 1946, you must live further up in the NH woods than we think.
I do not dispute that Stalin was worth killing, but it was a non-starter after 6 years of world war (4 for us). We could have nuked Moscow and waited to see what would have happened afterwards, but somehow I doubt if you would have advocated that.
Posted by: jim hamlen at December 14, 2003 2:27 PMjim:
Let our troops race East and the inevitable conflict with Soviet troops racing West would have been sufficient to get American blood up.
Posted by: oj at December 14, 2003 2:48 PMOur troops could have fought through the
winter contiually resupplied through the occupied
west. The soviet troops would have starved
over the first winter. We could have at least
gotten Poland and the Ukraine freed.
The Soviets wouldn't have lasted more than a couple of decades without the buffer zone.
Posted by: J.H. at December 14, 2003 2:54 PMSome of the Groucho-Truman relationship is captured in some letters re-printed in "THe Groucho Letters" (as the name suggests, a collection of Groucho's correspondence). After Truman leaves office, Groucho invites HST to visit him in Beverly Hills. He writes "If you're any good with a cue stick, you could win your expenses."
Posted by: Foos at December 14, 2003 3:42 PMDon't forget this: had we gone on to fight the Russians, Truman would have been vilified as much as Andrew Johnson. He had just assumed office and people thought the war was almost over. No way we were going to commit to something that would have required another year or two of war - and George Marshall would have probably shot Truman himself before following Napoleon and Hitler into the East. The nation might have followed Roosevelt on that adventure (suspending all reality here), but not Truman.
Speculation is fun, but Uncle Joe knew he was safe (rememer Alger Hiss?).
Posted by: jim hamlen at December 15, 2003 1:11 PMjim:
Moral cowardice is an explanation, but doesn't refute the point that the failure to fight the USSR in the mid-40s and to get rid of the New Deal after the War were the two biggest mistakes made by American presidents in the 20th Century.
Posted by: oj at December 15, 2003 3:11 PMI understand, but let me nominate another: not going to Berlin in 1918. Would have prevented at least one of your nominees, and probably both.
jim:
Berlin didn't matter--it was Moscow then too. And we had the perfect opportunity because of the Civil War, the Poles, the Germans, the Turks, and us all having troops either engaging the Bolsheviks or willing to.
Posted by: oj at December 15, 2003 4:14 PM