November 21, 2003

SQUANDERING SOCIAL CAPITAL (via Tom Corcoran):

Church and family can save kids (Miranda Devine, November 16, 2003, Sydney Morning Herald)

We seem to shrug helplessly at the soaring rates of children's mental illness, emotional distress, attention and conduct disorders, substance abuse and suicide.

The response of the babyboomer Left to this epidemic of youth misery has been to blame government and economic rationalism.

You will hear them moaning about the boring 1950s, when they grew up in a war-weary society that valued order, civility, domesticity and tranquillity. You will hear them fondly reminisce about the 1960s sexual revolution, their Kombi vans, their often-still-active ponytails.

Never will you hear them accept responsibility for trashing precious social institutions, destroying taboos, devaluing motherhood or squandering the moral capital built up by their forebears. Now, when their children and grandchildren are suffering the consequences, they see higher taxes as the cure. They seem not to listen even when scientific evidence emerges like a slap in the face to say childhood suffering is caused by a lack of spiritual meaning, an absence of expectations and limits and a breakdown in authority structures.

This is the message from an extraordinary American study recently released by 33 psychiatrists, neurologists and social scientists, Hardwired To Connect: The New Scientific Case For Authoritative Communities. The Dartmouth Medical School study says the human brain is "biologically hardwired for enduring attachments to other people and for moral and spiritual meaning". [...]

The study says we needn't be a captive of our genes any more than we are a blank slate for social engineers to mould. Most unpalatable for moral relativists is the study's emphasis on religion and spirituality, finding that the human brain is physically designed, or hardwired, to seek answers to life's purpose and meaning. For adolescents, religion has a protective effect against depression and loneliness. "Personal devotion" or a "direct personal relationship with the Divine" is associated with reduced risk-taking and better mental health.

Finally, the report stresses the importance of "authoritative communities" that set moral frameworks for children, the most important being the family. The "decline in social connectedness", the loss of civic and community groups and falling church attendance is thought to contribute "significantly" to childhood problems. [...]

Parents know how inherently conservative small children are, how they crave routine, discipline, defined limits and a distinction between good and evil. But if their parents and the society rearing them are locked in a perpetual state of adolescence, no wonder so many are anxious and vulnerable.


If you keep hammering away at the foundations, you have no right to act surprised and helpless when the structure teeters.

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 21, 2003 9:31 AM
Comments

"biologically hardwired for moral and spiritual meaning"? Now THAT is one that leaves me speechless.

Posted by: Peter B at November 21, 2003 9:59 AM

I may be wrong on the specific act, but the (I think) Americans With Disabilities Act provides cash compensation for families with dependent children suffering from a disability.

Proving once again that where there is money there will be supply.

The point being that the supposed rise in these childhood ills could be the result of paying for their occurrence.

Posted by: Jeff Guinn at November 21, 2003 12:01 PM

Jeff-

At least we can agree that the science of human psychology as it relates to human nature is less than exact in light of the fact that institutional arrangements regarding religion and family have spontaneously developed over generations. Is it possible that such institutional arrangements reflect a part of what it means to be human and to disregard or denigrate and devalue them rather than supporting and encouraging them may be harmful since it denies a part of human nature that is outside the rationalist assumptions regarding same? The "dunno" response would work as it would regarding the concerns many have regarding gay marriage.

Posted by: Tom C., Stamford,Ct. at November 23, 2003 11:46 AM

On what evidence do you say that those older arrangements worked better?

My favorite examples -- mere anecdotes to Jeff -- are those that put everybody in a bad light, because if everybody has screwed up, that forces you really to think hard about what they thought they were up to. One thinks of Rousseau presenting each of his five babies at the gate of the Church's anonymous foundling home.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at November 23, 2003 4:30 PM

Harry:

That worked better than killing them.

Posted by: oj at November 23, 2003 6:02 PM

Harry:

Who other than Rousseau does that story put in a bad light?

Posted by: Peter B at November 23, 2003 6:54 PM

The Church, French society, French and Church legists.

We are having a small debate in my state right now about a "right to abandon" law. John Boswell's history of child abandonment in Classical and Christian times seems not to have been read by anybody.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at November 24, 2003 1:08 AM

I'm sorry I asked.

Posted by: Peter B at November 24, 2003 5:43 AM

John Boswell is not one of the historians I would recomend as offering insights other than those one could assume he would have. His sexual fixation is rather unique for an historian.

Had Rousseau abandoned his children among rationalists rather than a Catholic orphanage Harry's point would be...?

Posted by: Tom C., Stamford,Ct. at November 24, 2003 12:39 PM
« DRASTIC TIMES/DRASTIC MEASURES (via Bruce Cleaver): | Main | OSAMA NEEDS TO STOP WATCHING THE BBC AND CNN: »