November 25, 2003

RARE COMMON SENSE ON NCLBA:

No Child Left Behind Act: Facts and Fiction (Jay Mathews, November 11, 2003,
Washington Post)

The No Child Left Behind Act, in its second year, is the most ambitious federal effort to raise achievement in public schools in 38 years. It is also one of the most complicated education laws passed by Congress, leading to a host of myths and misinterpretations. Here are 10 statements about the law that experts say are heard often but are not firmly anchored in reality.

Reality? The critics couldn't find it with a map.

MORE MYTH BUSTING:
The Big Lie in Hollywood: The Hollywood Ten Were Not Victims But Villains (Michael Berliner, November 24, 2003, Capitalism)

Lie Number One: By requiring them to testify and then jailing them for refusing, the House Un-American Activities Committee violated the First Amendment, free speech rights of the Hollywood Ten. The truth: No one interfered with their freedom of speech. In fact, freedom of speech was not even an issue. HUAC was investigating a question of fact, the fact being membership in the Communist Party. The Committee did not ask anyone whether he believed in communism, but asked only whether he had joined the Communist Party. By joining the Party (an undisputed fact), the filmmakers were not merely making an ideological statement but were agreeing to take orders to commit actions -- criminal and treasonable actions, since the Party, and the Soviet government it served, was openly dedicated to the overthrow of the U.S. government. Therefore, there was a national security reason for the Committee to determine membership in the Party. In notes to herself prior to testifying as a "Friendly Witness" in 1947, Ayn Rand wrote that "Under American law, there is no such thing as a political crime; a man's ideas do not constitute a crime, no matter what they are. And precisely by the same principle, a man's ideas -- no matter what they are -- cannot serve as a justification for a criminal action and do not give him freedom to commit such actions on the ground that they represent his personal belief." Legal issues aside, there is an obscene irony in the Communist writers complaining that their right to freedom of speech was violated, since that right was precisely what the Communist Party was out to destroy.

Lie Number Two: The Hollywood Ten were persecuted by being refused jobs. The truth: They were denied employment by executives who were exercising the right to hire whom they wished -- a fundamental right in a free society. It was within the employers' right (and self-interest) not to hire writers who wanted to use their positions to eliminate all private property and private business. What the writers wanted -- in refusing to testify -- was the "right" to hide their ideology on the grounds that, were it known, they'd be fired. In other words, they wanted the "right" to defraud their employers. In a free society, there is a private right to boycott (which the Hollywood leftists used against hundreds of anti-Communists). The right to freedom of speech prohibits the government from interfering with the expression of ideas, and that means that an employer cannot be forced to propagate ideas he's opposed to.

Lie Number Three (the biggest lie): The blacklisted writers were humanitarian idealists. The truth: Their "ideal" was the sacrifice of the individual to the collective, a moral viewpoint endorsed by Marxism and put into practice by the Soviet government. It was an "ideal" that destroyed millions of human lives. The Communist Party championed by the Hollywood Ten was the same Party that -- under the leadership of Joseph Stalin -- exterminated millions of peasants in the Ukraine. The "persecuted" writers dutifully paid their dues to the Party whose reign of terror included murdering or banishing to Siberia anyone who remotely threatened its power. The Hollywood Ten littered their movie scripts with Soviet propaganda, the same Soviets who signed a non-aggression pact with Adolph Hitler. While the Hollywood Communists and apologists talked of peace, brotherhood, and workers' rights, their spiritual masters were perpetrating what is arguably the most murderous tyranny in world history, its victims estimated at 20-40 million people -- not including the tens of millions relegated to a sub-human existence. Far from being pitiable victims, the Hollywood Ten and their followers have the blood of millions on their hands.

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 25, 2003 7:22 PM
Comments

I'm 69 years old and thank God I lived to see the truth told at last.

Posted by: erp at November 25, 2003 7:59 PM

It's not that sensible--nothing in the Constitution gives the Federal Government the right to dictate to states on education matters.

Posted by: Kirk Parker at November 25, 2003 9:28 PM

Kirk:

And the Feds don't, unless you want their money...

Posted by: oj at November 25, 2003 9:55 PM

As is my want, I looked hard to find things to argue with. Here they are:

Posted by: Jeff Guinn at November 26, 2003 8:46 AM

There are those in Hollywood who still carry the torch, and not so subtly.

Posted by: Genecis at November 26, 2003 12:17 PM

The torch also has been passed to the theater where one of the ten (Trumbo) now is the subject of a reverential play.

Posted by: at November 26, 2003 3:56 PM

The big myth of No Child Left Behind is that the schools are to blame, or the administrators.

Obviously this could be true in some cases, and in a continent-size country, there might be a lot of examples.

But as a general proposition, it can be tested, and it turns out the big myth is, indeed, a myth.

Conservatives are fond of saying that the states provide laboratories for policy. Well, Hawaii has a statewide school system, equalized spending and all the stuff that act as a control experiment.

Yet some schools do very well, others very badly.

Conclusion: Most of the time, it's the students and the parents, not the teachers, who determine the outcome of the schooling.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at November 27, 2003 1:33 PM

Harry:

So? Let the good students escape.

Posted by: oj at November 27, 2003 5:42 PM

It isn't the system that's the problem, so leaving isn't the answer.

Although, to a degree, it happens anyway.

When I was much younger and a sportswriter covering black college teams, it was almost routine to learn that players had parents in northern slums but had been sent South to live with grandparents to escape the effects of urban life.

That escape route has shriveled now that another whole generation separates urban blacks from their rural roots.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at November 28, 2003 1:28 PM

Harry:

Obviously a system that fails to give so many kids evben a rudimentary education is a problem. Leaving for parochial schools or better public ones or for third ways (for example, five kids with one private tutor) is surely a good answer.

Posted by: oj at November 28, 2003 1:33 PM

Yes, but if the system isn't failing them, then something else must be.

In my county, they leave school to surf. You cannot blame that on the system, can you?

Posted by: Harry Eagar at November 29, 2003 3:59 PM

Why not?

Posted by: oj at November 29, 2003 4:03 PM
« A.K.A., DEATH TO FLYING THINGS: | Main | 66 MORE YEARS: »