November 1, 2003
FIRST ORDER, THEN FREEDOM:
Last man standing (The Japan Times, Nov. 1, 2003)
There has been little public outcry about the fall of Russia's richest citizens. The oligarchs acquired their wealth through dubious means: a "shares for loans" deal with former President Boris Yeltsin that secured his re-election in 1996, in exchange for the virtual handover of many of the country's largest businesses. Mr. Khodorkovsky, for example, bought 45 percent of Yukos, for $159 million, only $9 million more than the government's opening bid for the company's shares. The deals were legal, but they stank, and ordinary Russians resent the men who profited from them. [...]While most of Russia -- apart from democrats -- applauded Mr. Khodorkovsky's fall, the rest of the world has not been so sanguine. [...]
[I]t is plain that civil society is under assault in Russia. Mr. Putin is doing his utmost to extend his authority into every sphere of political and economic activity. While he claims he is attempting to restore the rule of law, his action looks more like the restoration of authoritarianism. Russia's democracy is being undermined from within. Neither Russia's citizens nor other governments should acquiesce to this assault.
The absence of a vital civil society in Russia is why it needs an authoritarian period to establish law and order. If Mr. Putin is prepared to be his nation's much needed Pinochet, this is a good sign. Posted by Orrin Judd at November 1, 2003 9:50 AM
That Russia needs a Pinochet-like establishment of law and order is a correct observation. I don't doubt that Putin's prepared to do it. The question is whether he's capable. The way he's dealing with the Chechnian situation isn't very encouraging though. His approach is brutal but incompetent, exactly the terrible combination the Russians keep making.
Posted by: Peter at November 1, 2003 11:14 AMRussia already had an authoritarian period, but it failed to establish law, order, civil society, democracy etc. It was carefully argued out and called the theory of the Autokrator.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at November 1, 2003 3:55 PMHarry is right. Putin's recent actions don't look good to me. Pinochet was (roughly) working against state control of the economy, while Putin seems to be doing the opposite.
Posted by: PapayaSF at November 1, 2003 4:16 PMYes, Putin needs to get them back to where they were under the Tsars and moving forward accordingly.
Posted by: OJ at November 1, 2003 5:32 PMWhen have Russians done anything other than screw up? Why should Putin break with the traditions of his ancestors?
Posted by: Amos at November 1, 2003 8:36 PMRussian turmoil is all the more reason to perfect and enact a US missile defense "shield".
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at November 2, 2003 5:22 AMOrrin believes, without any evidence, that Russia was moving forward under the czars. The Russians themselves did not think so.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at November 2, 2003 7:44 PMHarry:
What % of Russians was involved in the Revolution? Maybe 2%
Posted by: OJ at November 2, 2003 8:00 PM