September 19, 2003
WOE IS ME, WEPT PAUL:
'I do get rattled': Paul Krugman is a mild-mannered university economist. He is also a New York Times columnist and President Bush's most scathing critic. Hence the death threats. (Oliver Burkeman, September 19, 2003, The Guardian)
The letters that Paul Krugman receives these days have to be picked up with tongs, and his employer pays someone to delete the death threats from his email inbox. This isn't something that can be said of most academics, and emphatically not of economic theorists, but Krugman isn't a typical don. Intercepting him in London on his way back home to New Jersey after a holiday in France, I half expect to find a couple of burly minders keeping a close eye on him, although they would probably have to be minders with a sound grasp of Keynesian macroeconomics. "I can't say I never get rattled," the gnomish, bearded 50-year-old Princeton University professor says a little hesitantly, looking every inch the ivory-tower thinker he might once have expected to be. "When it gets personal, I do get rattled."What drives his critics hysterical is not, it ought to be clarified, his PhD thesis on flexible exchange rates, or his well-regarded textbook on the principles of economics, co-written with his wife, the economist Robin Wells; nor the fact that he is probably the world authority on currency crises. For the past five years, Krugman - a lifelong academic with the exception of a brief stint as an economics staffer under Reagan - has been moonlighting as a columnist on the New York Times op ed page, a position so influential in the US that it has no real British parallel. And though that paper's editors seem to have believed that they were hiring him to ponder abstruse matters of economic policy, it didn't work out that way.
Accustomed to the vigorous ivy league tradition of calling a stupid argument a stupid argument (and isolated, at home in New Jersey, from the Washington dinner-party circuit frequented by so many other political columnists) he has become pretty much the only voice in the mainstream US media to openly and repeatedly accuse George Bush of lying to the American people: first to sell a calamitous tax cut, and then to sell a war.
Given our druthers, which we aren't, wouldn't you prefer that the Left call conservatives fascists that that they wallow in this kind of self-pity. Sure, the Nazi comparisons are fatuous, but they're less embarrassing to read than this frivel. Posted by Orrin Judd at September 19, 2003 10:27 PM
I really like the line about "calling a stupid argument a stupid argument", considering how one of the prime sources of stupid arguments in the past few years has been Mr. Krugman.
I think I can remember a time when Dr. Krugman wrote for Slate. And I think I remember finding his stuff reasonably tightly reasoned, even when I didn't agree with his point.
Since joining the NYT, he seems to have come unhinged.
Is this a desperate cry for help?
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at September 20, 2003 6:10 PM