April 20, 2003

FROM THE "RUN THE EXPERIMENT" FILES Real Self-Esteem Builds On Real Achievement (SHARON BEGLEY, Wall Street Journal) (subscription required, unfortunately)

At the annual meeting of psychology researchers in Boston three years ago, two scientists weighed in on a question that seemed to be as much in need of investigation as whether the sun rises in the east.

The pair had asked a professor to send weekly e-mail messages to students of his who had done poorly on their first exam for the class. Each missive included a review question. In addition, one-third of the students, chosen at random, also received a message -- advice to study, for example -- suggesting that how well they did in the course was under their own control. The other third received the review question plus a "You're too smart to get a D!" pep talk aimed at raising their self-esteem, which everyone knows boosts academic performance.

Oops.

Compared with the other e-mail recipients, the D and F students who got the self-esteem injection performed notably worse on later tests. [...]

In the case of the struggling students, the likely reason the self-esteem intervention backfired speaks volumes. Students work hard partly because it helps them do better academically; 95s feel better than 65s. But "an intervention that encourages them to feel good about themselves regardless of work may remove the reason to work hard -- resulting in poorer performance," suggest psychologist Roy Baumeister and colleagues in a monograph to be published next month in Psychological Science in the Public Interest. (The four were tapped by the American Psychological Society to undertake the study.) If you get to feel good without learning Maxwell's equations or the causes of the Korean War, why bother?

It isn't just school performance. From the 200-plus studies they analyzed, the APS group found no evidence that boosting self-esteem (by therapeutic interventions or school programs) results in better job performance, lowered aggression or reduced delinquency. And "high self-esteem does not prevent children from smoking, drinking, taking drugs, or engaging in early sex," it concluded.

Of course, self-esteem and school or job performance are correlated. But long overdue scientific scrutiny points out the foolishness of supposing that people's opinion of themselves can be the cause of achievement. Rather, high-esteem is the result of good performance. [...]

Amid the ashes of self-esteem, the APS team finds one benefit: High self-esteem makes you happier. But that jolly outcome ensues whether your self-esteem is justified or delusional.

As we persist in praising children even for mediocre work and trivial accomplishments, I can't resist ending with a plea from the APS scientists: "Psychologists should reduce their own self-esteem a bit and humbly resolve that next time they will wait for a more thorough and solid empirical basis before making policy recommendations to the American public."


Perhaps while the kids are saying the Pledge every morning, educators could borrow a pledge from Hippocrates (?): "First, do no harm..." Posted by Orrin Judd at April 20, 2003 11:37 AM
Comments

While I imagine this may be correct, the reverse

is not true: telling people they are dunces does

impair performance.



I don't need any psychologists to prove it. I

live in a whole society that proves it.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at April 21, 2003 1:02 AM

Harry:



Dunces exist.

Posted by: oj at April 21, 2003 10:33 AM

Yeah, but if you apply the term to people who are not dunces, you get bad results. Called the "crabs-in-the-bucket effect."

Posted by: Harry Eagar at April 21, 2003 4:10 PM

There seems little to fear on that account.

Posted by: oj at April 21, 2003 10:29 PM
« KILL ONE, GET ONE FREE? (via Richard Compton): | Main | IS EUROPE REALLY A SAFE HAVEN: »