April 6, 2003
BOOKNOTES:
Fraud of the Century: Rutherford B. Hayes, Samuel Tilden, and the Stolen Election of 1876 by Roy Morris, Jr. (C-SPAN, April 6, 2003 , 8 & 11 pm)In this major work of popular history and scholarship, acclaimed historian and biographer Roy Morris, Jr., tells the extraordinary story of how, in America's centennial year, the presidency was stolen, the Civil War was almost reignited, and black Americans were consigned to nearly ninety years of legalized segregation in the South.The bitter 1876 contest between Ohio Republican governor Rutherford B. Hayes and New York Democratic governor Samuel J. Tilden is the most sensational, ethically sordid, and legally questionable presidential election in American history. The first since Lincoln's in 1860 in which the Democrats had a real chance of recapturing the White House, the election was in some ways the last battle of the Civil War, as the two parties fought to preserve or overturn what had been decided by armies just eleven years earlier.
Riding a wave of popular revulsion at the numerous scandals of the Grant administration and a sluggish economy, Tilden received some 260,000 more votes than his opponent. But contested returns in Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina ultimately led to Hayes's being declared the winner by a specially created, Republican-dominated Electoral Commission after four tense months of political intrigue and threats of violence. President Grant took the threats seriously: he ordered armed federal troops into the streets of Washington to keep the peace.
Morris brings to life all the colorful personalities and high drama of this most remarkable -- and largely forgotten -- election. He presents vivid portraits of the bachelor lawyer Tilden, a wealthy New York sophisticate whose passion for clean government propelled him to the very brink of the presidency, and of Hayes, a family man whose midwestern simplicity masked a cunning political mind. We travel to Philadelphia, where the Centennial Exhibition celebrated America's industrial might and democratic ideals, and to the nation's heartland, where Republicans waged a cynical but effective "bloody shirt" campaign to tar the Demo-crats, once again, as the party of disunion and rebellion.
Morris dramatically recreates the suspenseful events of election night, when both candidates went to bed believing Tilden had won, and a one-legged former Union army general, "Devil Dan" Sickles, stumped into Republican headquarters and hastily improvised a devious plan to subvert the election in the three disputed southern states. We watch Hayes outmaneuver the curiously passive Tilden and his supporters in the days following the election, and witness the late-night backroom maneuvering of party leaders in the nation's capital, where democracy itself was ultimately subverted and the will of the people thwarted.
Fraud of the Century presents compelling evidence that fraud by Republican vote-counters in the three southern states, and especially in Louisiana, robbed Tilden of the presidency. It is at once a masterful example of political reporting and an absorbing read.
Posted by Orrin Judd at April 6, 2003 2:04 PM
Frankly a guy with a kick-ass name like Rutherford B. Hayes deserved to be Prez.
And accusing Democrats of disloyalty shows some things never change.
Off topic but not.
I am finding when I get into war arguments, it is more and more devolving into "Well, Bush stole the election, so he's a dictator too... blah blah blah." I can answer this, but it takes ten minutes of Florida minutae to do so.
So my question, and I may mass it out to the blogosphere... Is there any one source that links all the recount results from Florida in one place? I know re-counts were done by USA Today, Washington Post, NY Times, WSJ, etc. etc.
Is there any one list I can whip out of my pocket and say "So how many votes did YOU count, big boy? The people who actually DID count them say...." I know Bush won most but not all of those counts. (Gore won one by THREE votes.. out of six million.)
Any help here? Thanks.
My knowledge of the Reconstruction period is woefully inadequate, but how would electing a Democrat have helped southern blacks, practically all of whom were Republicans? I'm sure there's a reason, or it wouldn't have been said, but I'm curious as to what it is...
Posted by: Timothy at April 6, 2003 11:05 PMAndrew:
I think you can find what you need in the links following this review:
http://www.brothersjudd.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/reviews.detail/book_id/88
OJ -
Thanks. But are your referring to your link (which I checked) or to Sammon's book? I might be wrong, but I thought Sammons book came out before the recounts were all done, which was like eight months later.
I'm just looking for a one page list of the various recount numbers. If Sammons book has them, maybe I'll go buy it.
Much appreciated.
Of course there is another way of looking at that election. Those states
that were in dispute, Florida, Texas
& S. Carolina, might the vote totals
have been skewed because of the
active intimidation of the Democratic
'fedayeen' aka the Klan, murdering any of those who would vote the
carpetbagger line, If this was so,
wasn't Tilden's claim, & Hayes concession, the ultimate victory that
cemented the rise of Jim Crow
Andrew:
I think the links that follow it will take you to what you want.
