March 12, 2003

THE BIRTH OF TRAGEDY:

Truman Acts to Save Nations From Red Rule (Felix Belair Jr., March 12, 1947, The New York Times)
President Truman outlined a new foreign policy for the United States today. In a historic message to Congress, he proposed that this country intervene wherever necessary throughout the world to prevent the subjection of free peoples to Communist-inspired totalitarian regimes at the expense of their national integrity and importance.

In a request for $400,000,000 to bolster the hard-pressed Greek and Turkish governments against Communist pressure, the President said the constant coercion and intimidation of free peoples by political infiltration amid poverty and strife undermined the foundations of world peace and threatened the security of the United States.

Although the President refrained from mentioning the Soviet Union by name, there could be no mistaking his identification of the Communist state as the source of much of the unrest throughout the world. He said that, in violation of the Yalta Agreement, the people of Poland, Rumania and Bulgaria had been subjected to totalitarian regimes against their will and that there had been similar developments in other countries.

As the Senate and House of Representatives sat grim-faced but apparently determined on the course recommended by the Chief Executive, Mr. Truman made these cardinal points of departure from traditional American foreign policy:

"I believe that it must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures.

"I believe that our help should be primarily through economic and financial aid which is essential to economic stability and orderly political processes."


However well-intentioned, the Truman doctrine put the US on defense for the next forty years, costing millions of lives and trillions of dollars, tearing apart American society and leaving great swaths of the globe with virtually no conception of society other than as a one to one relation between the individual and his government. In 1947 it would have been rather easy in military terms, if not in political, to destroy the Soviet Union and restore freedom to millions. By essentially agreeing instead to countenance Soviet domination of Eastern Europe we became a partner in the maintenance of the Iron Curtain. Posted by Orrin Judd at March 12, 2003 10:46 AM
Comments

Hail to thee, blithe spirit, and just what easy campaign do you envisage?



A few days ago, one of the posters suggested we could have dropped the big one on Moscow. No we couldn't. We didn't have a plane that would reach Moscow.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at March 12, 2003 3:21 PM

Bunk--Curtis LeMay purposefully showed his boisses in Washington that it was quite possible to reach Moscow if only they'd give him the green light:



http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:Mc8E5K7sHk8C:www.40thbombgroup.org/DCFlight.pdf+curtis+lemay+distance+flight+record&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8

Posted by: oj at March 12, 2003 4:00 PM

From what base. The Enola Gay was barely capable of taking off with Little Boy aboard and had to go only 1,500 miles. What airbase did we have within 1,500 miles of Moscow?



I wrote the above before I linked to the post, because, like George Bush, I have no doubts. Then I linked. Did you read it yourself? Apparently not. That B-29 was stripped and its bomb bay was full of auxiliary gas tanks, it says.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at March 12, 2003 6:13 PM

Even Rome is within 1500 miles

Posted by: oj at March 12, 2003 7:04 PM

What in the world does that mean?



B29s could not have reached Moscow. Not armed.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at March 13, 2003 12:40 PM

You asked the question.

Posted by: oj at March 13, 2003 12:59 PM
« UNO MAS | Main | TODAY'S OXYMORON -- GUILELESS FRENCHMAN: »