February 6, 2003

THROWING OUT THE BABY (ASSAD) WITH THE BAATH PARTY:

Pining for Freedom: Syrian occupation suffocates Lebanon, and the world shrugs. (CLAUDIA ROSETT, February 5, 2003, Wall Street Journal)
On the matter of this outrageous occupation, there is from many quarters a disturbing indifference. From the Arab world, so full of dictators professing deep concern over democratic Israel's dealings with the Palestinians, there comes not a croak of indignation that despotic Syria continues to occupy Lebanon. From the democratic club of nations comes the occasional groan, including noises recently from both Congress and the European Union. But there has been no serious effort to lever Syria out of Lebanon, or to end Syria's support for Hezbollah--whose terrorists bombed the U.S. Embassy and Marine barracks here in the 1980s, and today carry out assaults on Israel and threaten the U.S. itself.

By U.S. government estimates, some 25,000 Syrian troops are still based in Lebanon, though in recent years they have stayed out of sight, or at least out of uniform, in the capital itself. But Syria's army is just one part of the extensive machinery Damascus wields to keep control. "All our intelligence agencies are under Syrian control," former Lebanese president Amin Gemayel tells me. Lebanon's Maronite Christian patriarch says that the entire Lebanese government has become "a creature of Syria." [...]

I met a group of Lebanese students from various universities, and they also seem to know what democracy means. They all despair of Lebanon's prospects under Syrian occupation. "I don't see that we have a future in Lebanon," said one young man, who plans to leave next year for France. Were there any prospect of Lebanese self-rule, he says he might stay; but "in a totalitarian country, we don't have our future in our hands."

None of this is to say that Lebanon in its heyday was a pristine democracy, or that forcing out Syria would lead immediately to the creation of a free and peaceful society. But the foundations exist, and so does a thoughtful and in some cases daringly outspoken opposition, full of people who wonder why they have been consigned by the free world to live under the shadow of Damascus. As the more enlightened nations of Europe, along with America, ponder ways of bringing true peace and stability to the Middle East, it would be wise to put the liberation of Lebanon high on the agenda. To ignore the democratic promise of this country's early past, while leaving Syria to manage its future "stability," would be to go on incubating monsters.


One of the few missteps the Bush administration has made since 9-11 was not including Syria on the intial Axis of Evil, but there'll be an opening soon. Posted by Orrin Judd at February 6, 2003 11:40 AM
Comments

Mr. Judd;



Strange as it is, I must take President Bush's side in this. Syria is clearly a pustule on the face of humanity, but it's not as bad as Iraq. It would seem that "rope-a-dope" in this regard is at least as tenable as it is for the Saudi Entity or even the UN, for that matter. Like any other pollution, the best strategy is to clean up that which removes the most dirt for the least cost, then move on to the harder cases.

Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at February 6, 2003 2:47 PM
« STRUMMIN' HER PAIN WITH HIS FINGERS (via the esteemed Kevin Whited): | Main | ENMITY AND IVORY: »