February 8, 2003

THERE'S NEVER A BAD TIME TO FREE IRAQ:

Invading Iraq not a new idea for Bush clique: 4 years before 9/11, plan was set (WILLIAM BUNCH, Jan. 27, 2003, Philadelphia Daily News)
It was 2:40 p.m. on Sept. 11, 2001, and rescue crews were still scouring the ravaged section of the Pentagon that hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 had destroyed just five hours earlier.

On the other side of the still-smoldering Pentagon complex, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was poring through incoming intelligence reports and jotting down notes. Although most Americans were still shell-shocked, Rumsfeld's thoughts had already turned to a longstanding foe.

Rumsfeld wrote, according to a later CBS News report, that he wanted "best info fast. Judge whether good enough [to] hit S.H. at the same time. Not only UBL" - meaning Osama bin Laden. He added: "Go massive. Sweep it all up. Things related and not."

"S.H.," of course, is Saddam Hussein. The White House has long insisted its strategy for a war against Saddam's Iraq - a war that could now begin in a matter of days - arose from the rubble of the deadly attack that day.

But in reality, Rumsfeld, Vice President Dick Cheney, and a small band of conservative ideologues had begun making the case for an American invasion of Iraq as early as 1997 - nearly four years before the Sept. 11 attacks and three years before President Bush took office.


It's pretty amusing that the hawks think they've made George W. Bush see the light and the doves think he's been captured: as if he didn't know he was hiring the anti-Saddam cabal? Posted by Orrin Judd at February 8, 2003 5:50 AM
Comments

Wasn't Cheney in favour of a new sanctions regime before 9/11?



There didn't seem much impetus for a war before that.

Posted by: M Ali Choudhury at February 8, 2003 6:53 AM

Ali:



You've gotta have pretext. 9-11 saved us staging a Maine or a Tonkin Gulf.

Posted by: oj at February 8, 2003 8:26 AM
« MR. SCHUMER GOES TO WASHINGTON: | Main | HOPEFULLY NOT TOO LONG-TERM AN EXERCISE: »