February 6, 2003
THE CLOSET CONSERVATIVE:
Faith-based initiatives quietly lunge forward: Proposals on drug-program funding and religious buildings raise civil libertarians' ire. (Linda Feldmann, February 06, 2003, Christian Science Monitor)When the Senate failed last year to act on President Bush's signature "faith-based initiative," the White House did not give up.Bit by bit, through executive orders and changes in agency regulations, the administration has been carrying out the initiative anyway. Its goal is to allow religious groups to compete more easily for federal funds to address under-served social needs, such as helping the homeless and the drug-addicted. Seven government departments now have faith-based offices, which steer religious groups toward billions of dollars in grant money.
Yesterday, the Senate Finance Committee was set to approve legislation that would allow people who do not itemize on their taxes to deduct a portion of their charitable giving, a move that would benefit religious organizations. But among the president's faith-based plans, this item isn't especially controversial.
The most controversial proposal to date has come out of the Department of Housing and Urban Development: HUD has proposed a change in its rules to allow taxpayer money to be used for the construction, acquisition, or rehabilitation of houses of worship. Under the plan, the government would subsidize those portions of a building that would be used for social services, such as food pantries, counseling, or homeless shelters.
We don't much believe in coincidences. Posted by Orrin Judd at February 6, 2003 8:07 PM
The pantries in the mosques will be handy
for the ricin and the kalashnikovs.
Why should us white boys have all the fun?
Posted by: oj at February 7, 2003 12:21 AMI can't wait to see if HUD, or any governmental agency, will be willing to dish out the cash to aid my church's efforts at charity. I'm not holding my breath, but it won't stop us from continuing to attend to needy causes either. Judaism and Christianity don't have an iron grip on the concept of compassion, something that the administration sadly doesn't want to recognize.
Posted by: Ann Northcutt Gray at February 7, 2003 10:31 AMAnn:
No, but they--and the Nation of Islam--do seem to be the only ones who are effective at delivering social services.
