January 25, 2003

TWO WINGS GOOD, FOUR WINGS BAD:

Four-Winged Dinosaurs and the Dawn of Flight (Kate Wong, January 23, 2003, Scientific American)
The ancestors of birds may have taken to the air on four wings and a prayer. Paleontologists have recovered from deposits in Liaoning, China, dinosaur fossils that exhibit evidence of flight feathers on their hindlimbs as well as their forelimbs. The specimens are said to represent a long-sought intermediate stage in the evolution of birds from flightless theropod dinosaurs, and could breathe new life into the theory that protobirds glided between trees before developing powered, flapping flight.
Evolutionary biologists have long debated whether birds began winging it by gliding among the trees or by racing along on the ground. The latter scenario has gained favor in recent years. But the new finds, described in a report published today in the journal Nature, "provide negative evidence for the ground-up hypothesis" and instead support the arboreal gliding scenario, assert study author Xing Xu of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and his colleagues. [...]

Xu and his collaborators base their conclusions on the long aerodynamic feathers that cover the fore- and hindlimbs of Microraptor according to the same pattern seen on modern bird wings. Long feathers around the ankles would have made traveling on the ground difficult. But the forelimb and hindlimb feathers "would make a perfect aerofoil together," the authors write, likening it to the membrane employed by bats and gliding animals.


Well, obviously not perfect, or natural selection wouldn't have disposed of them, would it? Posted by Orrin Judd at January 25, 2003 4:42 PM
Comments

Of course natural selection could have eliminated this creature even if its two wings made a perfect airfoil.



First off, as the article noted, the ankle feathers made walking difficult. If the environment changed that could have been enough to wipe them out.



No set of characteristics is a best fit for all environments. If we get hit by a planet killer asteroid that boils the oceans again the only life that will survive will be thermophiles and creatures in the deep earth biosphere. How well adapted various species are for their niches before that will be irrelevant because those niches will no longer exist.

Posted by: Mike Friedman at January 25, 2003 9:50 PM

Having evolved the feathers and gliding capability why would they have cared about walking on the ground? The whole point of the story is they could stay in the trees.

Posted by: oj at January 25, 2003 10:40 PM

Storrs Olson at the Smithsonian thinks the fossil

is a hoax. Apparently making fossils is a

big industry there.



If Olson is right, then that's another proof of

darwinism, because his argument is based on

what evolution excludes.

Posted by: Harry at January 26, 2003 12:09 AM

If it's real it proves Darwinism and if it's fake it proves Darwinism--I couldn't have put the reasons that Darwinism isn't science any better myself.

Posted by: oj at January 26, 2003 7:40 AM

It sure looks like a hoax. I don't get this "forelimb and hindlimb make a perfect aerofoil together" bit. Not in any aerodynamics I know.

Posted by: pj at January 26, 2003 8:11 AM

pj:



It has to be, otherwise it wouldn't have evolved. :)

Posted by: oj at January 26, 2003 8:58 AM
« A CONSTITUTION THE LEFT LOVES TO IGNORE: | Main | THE MOSS WITH TWO BACKS: »