January 24, 2003
RESISTANCE IS FUTILE:
When will we resist?: The US is preparing to attack the Arab world, while the Arabs whimper in submission (Edward Said, January 25, 2003, The Guardian)One opens the New York Times on a daily basis to read the most recent article about the preparations for war that are taking place in the United States. Another battalion, one more set of aircraft carriers and cruisers, an ever-increasing number of aircraft, new contingents of officers are being moved to the Persian Gulf area. An enormous, deliberately intimidating force is being built up by America overseas, while inside the country, economic and social bad news multiply with a joint relentlessness.The huge capitalist machine seems to be faltering, even as it grinds down the vast majority of citizens. None the less, George Bush proposes another large tax cut for the 1% of the population that is comparatively rich. The public education system is in crisis and health insurance for 50 million Americans simply does not exist. Israel asks for $15bn in additional loan guarantees and military aid. And the unemployment rates in the US mount inexorably, as more jobs are lost every day.
Nevertheless, preparations for an unimaginably costly war continue without either public approval or, at least until very recently, dramatically noticeable disapproval. A generalised indifference among the majority of the population (which may conceal great overall fear, ignorance and apprehension) has greeted the administration's warmongering and its strangely ineffective response to the challenge forced on it recently by North Korea. In the case of Iraq, with no weapons of mass destruction to speak of, the US plans a war; in the case of North Korea, it offers economic and energy aid. What a humiliating difference between contempt for the Arabs and respect for North Korea, an equally grim and cruel dictatorship. [...]
In this entire panorama of desolation, what catches the eye is the utter passivity and helplessness of the Arab world as a whole. The American government and its servants issue statement after statement of purpose, they move troops and material, they transport tanks and destroyers, but the Arabs individually and collectively can barely muster a bland refusal. At most they say no, you cannot use military bases in our territory, only to reverse themselves a few days later.
Why is there such silence and such astounding helplessness? The largest power in history is about to launch a war against a sovereign Arab country now ruled by a dreadful regime, the clear purpose of which is not only to destroy the Ba'ath regime but to redesign the entire region. The Pentagon has made no secret that its plans are to redraw the map of the whole Arab world, perhaps changing other regimes and borders in the process. No one can be shielded from the cataclysm if and when it comes. And yet, there is only long silence followed by a few vague bleats of polite demurral in response. Millions of people will be affected, yet America contemptuously plans for their future without consulting them. Do we deserve such racist derision?
This is not only unacceptable: it is impossible to believe. How can a region of almost 300 million Arabs wait passively for the blows to fall without attempting a collective roar of resistance? Has the Arab will completely dissolved? Even a prisoner about to be executed usually has some last words to pronounce. Why is there now no last testimonial to an era of history, to a civilisation about to be crushed and transformed utterly, to a society that, despite its drawbacks and weaknesses, nevertheless goes on functioning? [...]
There is a wonderful expression that very precisely and ironically catches our unacceptable helplessness, our passivity and inability to help ourselves now when our strength is most needed. The expression is: will the last person to leave please turn out the lights? We are that close to a kind of upheaval that will leave very little standing and perilously little left even to record, except for the last injunction that begs for extinction.
Hasn't the time come for us collectively to demand and formulate a genuinely Arab alternative to the wreckage about to engulf our world? This is not only a trivial matter of regime change, although God knows that we can do with quite a bit of that. Surely it can't be a return to Oslo, another offer to Israel to please accept our existence and let us live in peace, another cringing, crawling, inaudible plea for mercy? Will no one come out into the light of day to express a vision for our future that isn't based on a script written by Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz, those two symbols of vacant power and overweening arrogance? I hope someone is listening.
Even Admiral Yamamoto, after Pearl Harbor, realized that all Japan had done was "waken a sleeping tiger". Does Mr. Said really still not comprehend the magnitude of the error that the Islamicists made? The Arab world is helpless because it is so poorly run. Because it is poorly run and helpless it lashed out at the West, whose success is an ongoing humiliation. Because it lashed out it stands to be radically restructured, so that it will be better run, less helpless, and less likely to lash out. Having failed to write their own script they've left it to others to write one for them. This is a cultural failure on an epic scale and it is likely to be ugly. But as one of the leading lights of that culture he has no one to blame but himself. If he put one tenth of the energy into democratizing Palestine that he puts into moaning about Israel and America, we might not be in this mess. Posted by Orrin Judd at January 24, 2003 10:46 PM
By George W., if Mr. Said is seeing the light, we're making progress. I hope he becomes even more depressed.
Posted by: Steve White at January 24, 2003 10:52 PMI didn't read it as seeing the light, I read it as a call to the Arab world to unite and resist Israel and the US by force. Mr. Said is an Arab national socialist. He thinks the error of 9/11 was that it used too little firepower and was premature, i.e. undertaken before a united Arab nation had the strength to back it up.
Posted by: pj at January 25, 2003 8:26 AMThere are so many things that are so wrong about this article, but one sentence in particular leaped out at me:
"The huge capitalist machine seems to be faltering, even as it grinds down the vast majority of citizens."
My god(s). Some people really do live on another planet, don't they?
Ann:
Amen. Capitalism has failed because our GDP is only 10 Trillion dollars and growing?
I think the aveage Iraqi is secretly sewing the American flag he'll wave when the saddamites are driven out of power. Thus he has no time to protest the imminent invasion.
Posted by: Peter Schiavo at January 25, 2003 5:22 PMIf Islam means submission...
Posted by: Joseph Hertzlinger at January 25, 2003 10:52 PMThe ash heap of history is full of people
announcing the demise of capitalism.
The other day, an elderly retired diplomat
collared me at a confab and wanted to offer
his services based on the many current leaders
he had trained years ago in western Asia, or,
as he phrased it, "the United Arab Republic."
If I hadn't been raised to be polite to my
elders, I would have sprayed spittle in his
face. It was the best laugh I'd had in years.
Said has always been delusional. It says much
for Arabism that Orrin considers such a
fruitcake a leading light.
I have no idea whether Said has any influence
among Arabs. Probably not.
He sure has influence with the New York Times and the New York Review of Books.
Posted by: pj at January 26, 2003 9:45 PM