December 13, 2002

WE SHALL OVERCOME:

Transcript: The U.S. Middle East Partnership Initiative (Secretary of State Colin Powell, December 12, 2002, Heritage Foundation)
The spread of democracy and free markets, fueled by the wonders of the technological revolution, has created a dynamo that can generate prosperity and human well-being on an unprecedented scale. But this revolution has largely left the Middle East behind.

Throughout history, the countries of the Middle East have made invaluable contributions to the arts and sciences. Today, however, too many people there lack the very political and economic freedom, empowerment of women, and modern education they need to prosper in the 21st century. The 2002 Arab Human Development Report, written by leading Arab scholars and issued by the United Nations, identified a fundamental choice - between "inertia É [and] an Arab renaissance that will build a prosperous future for all Arabs." These are not my words. They come from Arab experts who have looked deeply into the issues. They are based on the stark facts.

Some 14 million Arab adults lack the jobs they need to put food on their tables, roofs over their heads, and hope in their hearts. Some 50 million more Arab young people will enter the already crowded job market over the next eight years.

But economies are not creating enough jobs. Growth is weak. The GDP of 260 million Arabs is already less than that of 40 million Spaniards, and falling even further behind. Add in the production of Iran’s 67 million people, and the total is still only two-thirds of Italy’s. Internally, many economies are stifled by regulation and cronyism. They lack transparency, and are closed to entrepreneurship, investment, and trade.

The countries of the Middle East are also largely absent from world markets. They generate barely one percent of the world’s non-oil exports. Only ten Middle Eastern countries belong to the World Trade Organization. The region’s governments are now recognizing, as Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak has warned, that "giving a boost to exports is a matter of life or death."

A shortage of economic opportunities is a ticket to despair. Combined with rigid political systems, it is a dangerous brew indeed. Along with freer economies, many of the peoples of the Middle East need a stronger political voice. We reject the condescending notion that freedom will not grow in the Middle East, or that there is any region of the world that cannot support democracy.

President Bush gave voice to the yearnings of people everywhere when he declared, in his West Point address, that "when it comes to the common rights and needs of men and women, there is no clash of civilizations. The requirements of freedom apply fully to Africa and Latin America and the entire Islamic world."

Given a choice between tyranny and freedom, people choose freedom.


Well said; now make it a mantra. Posted by Orrin Judd at December 13, 2002 8:49 AM
Comments

Step one: change religion to allow banks . . .



Step two: try to convince people it's OK to take step one . . .



Step three: try step one again



Step four: see Step two

Posted by: Harry at December 13, 2002 12:28 PM

Yes, we get it, Muslims are irredeemable....

Posted by: oj at December 13, 2002 2:06 PM

So far

Posted by: Harry at December 13, 2002 2:58 PM

I ran across another hilarious example of Muslim modernism last night, this from Roskill's life of Hankey.



In 1919, when Faisal came to Paris to attempt to create an Arab state out of the collapse of the Sherifian revolt, he went around saying, at every opportunity, "My ancestors were civilized when the ancestors of all the men in this room were savages."



This, from a camel jockey without two dinars to rub together, did not encourage the descendants of savages to put anything important into Faisal's hands.



If those guys have always been so far in advance of us, why are we begging them to catch up to us?



There's a fundamental disconnection here, and no amount of goodwill can bridge it.

Posted by: Harry at December 13, 2002 3:11 PM

So you'd say the Paris Peace Conference advanced the cause of Enlightenment in the Middle East?

Posted by: oj at December 13, 2002 4:01 PM

Nope, but reading Hankey's diary reveals that

appeasement has a longer pedigree than

most people think.

Posted by: Harry at December 14, 2002 10:23 PM
« THE RULE-MAKING POWER: | Main | THE DEMOCRATS BLACK PROBLEM: »