December 5, 2002

SPEAKING OF THE LACK OF PRODUCTIVITY IN EUROPE:

Season Of The Strike: Workers take to the streets in the U.K., France, Italy and Greece. Politicians fear a winter of discontent, but can they afford to meet the union demands? (TIME, Dec. 9, 2002)
Across Europe last week, union members left their jobs and marched. From the teachers and firemen of Britain to the cabbies and doctors of Greece, their demands were much the same: more social welfare benefits, shorter hours, better pay. Angry workers are the last thing European governments need right now. Confronted with sluggish growth and an accompanying drop in tax receipts, finance ministers worry that labor concessions would push budget deficits over E.U. limits. So some politicians are playing it tough, either denying union claims outright or linking them to cost-saving and modernization. Other leaders are caving in, delaying or diluting plans to improve labor market flexibility and reform failing pension systems. How governments respond to this wave of strikes — and other walkouts that are still to come — will help determine how their economies weather the economic slump.

In the rough-and-ready camp are British Prime Minister Tony Blair and his French counterpart, Jean-Pierre Raffarin. Last week Blair offered a deal to state healthcare workers for a pay rise tied to reforms, but refused wage demands by striking firefighters unless they modernize. Raffarin scored an important victory by threatening tough action against strikers who break the law. As a result, industrial action by farmers, truckers and state employees fizzled. In the worried and waffling camp are Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi — who has hesitated on promises to free up the labor market — and Greek leader Costas Simitis, who risks seeing his country's hard-won fiscal stability damaged by demands from public sector workers. Here's a look at four leaders standing nose-to-nose with the unions.


Disappointing to see Berlusconi prove himself more Italian than conservative, but Blair continues to be--with the glaring exception of his Europhilia--a nearly worthy successor to Margaret Thatcher. Posted by Orrin Judd at December 5, 2002 12:12 PM
Comments

Thatcher cut taxes, Blair's putting them up a lot and increasing government spending too.



Thatcher had clear ideas on the reforms she wanted to achieve and wasn't afraid of making tough decisions (like privatisation) while Blair has messed around for the past five years without achieving anything concrete, U-turning from one policy to another.



This is because unlike Thatcher he doesn't like being unpopular and is a lot more interested in government's role in "social justice" rather than actually following policies which work.



Frankly other than his excellent performance on foreign policy and his making Labour a sensible, electable party again, he isn't in Thatcher's league.

Posted by: M Ali Choudhury at December 5, 2002 11:38 AM

Yeah, but it's Britain. What's he doing that the Tories wouldn't?

Posted by: oj at December 5, 2002 12:06 PM

You could have said that the Tories would raise taxes and emphasize public services at any point in the last 60 years -- except during the '80's. Isn't that Thatcher's miracle, that she brought the Tories and Britain both around to a politics they normally despise?

Posted by: pj at December 5, 2002 3:49 PM

But it required the complete breakdown of their economy first.

Posted by: oj at December 5, 2002 4:24 PM

Thank God we live in a country where unions aren't arbitrarily given legal power that other associations of individuals don't have.



Thankfully, the United States recognizes that a group of people called "employees" has no more right to someone else's property than a group of people called "Grandma's bridge club" has. America, which values freedom first, knows that someone's property rights and rights of association don't vanish simply because he exchanges money for labor.



What's that? Oh, wait. Hold on a sec...

Posted by: Manny at December 5, 2002 7:24 PM
« BELLYING UP TO THE TROUGH: | Main | TESTOSTERONE IS DESTINY: »