December 16, 2002

HAIR BAND:

Nirvana, Pearl Jam, and the rapture of distress (David Dark, 12/16/2002, Books & Culture)
Unlike a good number of personalities covered on VH1's Behind the Music, the grunge era understood instinctively and in advance that no rock-and-roller can gain the world without risking the forfeiture of any and all soul. Dedicated to exposing the unmanageability of our everyday reality and decrying the hollowness with which family and peers speak and behave, the grunge vocation inevitably flirts with hypocrisy once the revolution gets televised. Cobain opened Nivana's final album with the observation that "Teenage angst has paid off well / Now I'm old and bored," and sought the company of elder Beat statesmen like William S. Burroughs. ("There's something wrong with that boy. He frowns for no good reason.")

In the meantime, Pearl Jam's Eddie Vedder (who, like Cobain, came from a broken home) unabashedly claimed a father-figure in, of all people, Pete Townsend, and perhaps overcame grunge's navel-gazing, woe-is-me tendencies by switching the intro to outro with "Jeremy," a meditation on teen suicide turned radio hit ("Daddy didn't give affection. And the boy was something that mommy wouldn't wear"). Still faithful to the grunge penchant for melancholy and horror over record label executives and moshing floor fans who appear to have neither hearts nor brains, Pearl Jam nevertheless managed to turn their gaze toward the holy mundane and marginal with such unlikely singles as "Elderly Woman Behind the Counter in a Small Town." And songs like "Better Man" and "Nothingman" took the rock genre in the direction of generational self-criticism by shining a light on multiplying villainies in so-called personal relationships.

And it isn't a cynical bent that seeks to acknowledge and illumine the darker corners of our nature. Pearl Jam's "Glorified G" lampoons our tendency to excuse our murdering mindsets with self-satisfied assertions that we love God. The indifference associated with the grunge label is the last accusation one could now level at Pearl Jam, whose work includes an effort to overcome Ticketmaster's hegemonic hold over live performance and a longterm commitment to social action. Eschewing the desensitizing powers of mass media, they've opted out of most publicity-seeking work save the occasional appearance on David Letterman, benefit concerts, and a grassroots-following reminiscent of nothing so much as the Grateful Dead phenomenon. Recently appearing in public with a Taxi Driver-style mohawk, Vedder remarked, "I'll keep the mohawk until we stop killing people abroad.You don't have to read the paper, you don't have to pay attention--but if you happen to see a picture of me and the mohawk's still there, you can just go, oh, yeah, we're still killing people."


In the same spirit of hair as politics, the Brothers hereby pledge to shave our beards when Islamic terrorists stop killing people. If you happen to look up at our logo and see that the beards are still there, you can just go--oh, yeah, the terrorists are still killing people. Posted by Orrin Judd at December 16, 2002 1:27 PM
Comments

ÉÉ—y mÉÉ—y minÉy moÉ

Catch a Judd Bro by thÉ toÉ

If hÉ hollÉrs, lÉt him go

But first makÉ him fix the damnÉd formatting whÉ— hÉ cuts a—d pastÉs



SHÉÉZ!

Posted by: Ris at December 16, 2002 10:59 PM

It actually doesn't appear that way on the Mac at home.

Posted by: oj at December 17, 2002 8:09 AM

Well, it looks that way on a Mac out here. (A meta tag specifying the character set might help?)



As for the "I'll keep the mohawk until we stop killing people abroadÉ" statement-- I assume that means he doesn't care about the people from abroad killing people here.

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at December 17, 2002 11:25 AM

Forget the beards, I'm counting the days until the tatoos
.

Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at December 17, 2002 11:59 AM

"A meta tag specifying..."



whahappen?

Posted by: oj at December 17, 2002 12:23 PM
« CUBA LIBRE: | Main | CRANKING UP CREEP: »