December 17, 2002

BOLDLY GOING:

The Science of Star Trek (Chad Cohen, December 13, 2002, National Geographic Today)
Star Trek: Nemesis, opening today in the United States, features alien species at every turn, enemy ships vaporizing in bursts of light and space ships traveling at "warp speed."

In the 24th century it all makes perfect sense—and also in the 21st. That's partly because Star Trek, from its first incarnation as a U.S. television series in 1966, has relied on real, or at least plausible, science for verisimilitude.

"One of the keys to the success of Star Trek is the fact that it is grounded in scientific credibility," says Andre Bormanis, a writer for UPN's Enterprise—the fifth Star Trek television series—who has a master's degree in science policy from George Washington University in Washington, D.C.

Now, though, science fiction and fact have thoroughly commingled as scientists pursue advances in alternative energy sources, artificial intelligence, cloning and interstellar travel.


As Brian, who sent this, says:
It always cracks me up when they talk about how Star Trek the Next Generation is based on real science. From the rumbling ship sounds in the vacuum of space to the high voltage sparks flying out of the control panels (whenever the ship is hit) to the 18th century combat tactics (line the soldiers up in rows and exchange fire), the show takes great liberties with reality. The biggest fiction is that sometime in the future, ship crews won't want to be paid anymore. (This was the deal on Captain Janeway's ship.)

That last is the most interesting to me. They do seem to assume some rather fundamental changes in the science of human nature, don't they?
Posted by Orrin Judd at December 17, 2002 3:02 PM
Comments

As some wag said recently, if they can find a way to make faster-than-light travel and teleportation possible, they probably can also make Marxism work too.

Posted by: Bruce Cleaver at December 17, 2002 2:10 PM

When you have replicators the size of microwaves that can make anything you want, ready cash is probably less important. But Kirk paid for that cabin in the woods with something
.

Posted by: Dodd at December 17, 2002 2:18 PM

Roddenberry was, sadly, a utopian socialist. (But I repeat myself.) He honestly thought that human nature could and would change. Read the novel version of the first movie -- both written by Rodster -- and see what I mean.



Yes, I am that much of a geek.



This is also why they phased him out of the direct-line creative stuff with the movies.

Posted by: Christopher Badeaux at December 17, 2002 3:09 PM

I'd also add the complete disappearance of religion as a significant influence on the lives of the crew - no ship's chaplain, no devout believers in anything, unless we count the occasional search for American Indian spirit guides.

Posted by: Keith Reimer at December 18, 2002 6:39 AM
« ANY CLASSICISTS OUT THERE?: | Main | THE SWORD'S OTHER EDGE: »