November 22, 2002

SO MANY BOOKS, SO LITTLE TIME:

Straw Liberals and False Prophets (Eric Alterman, December 9, 2002, The Nation)
The purpose of intellectuals, as Amos Oz instructed the 1986 PEN writers' conference, is to make distinctions. When Kristof, Hitchens, Beinart and Rosenbaum smear all liberals and leftists with the sins of a silly few, they are repudiating the highest calling each writer professes to revere. If they really wish to say goodbye to their "ex-comrades" in an honest and responsible fashion, they should go after those writers and thinkers whose work speaks for larger, more significant tendencies than those written on demonstration placards. Paul Simon notwithstanding, the words of the prophets are not written on the subway walls and tenement halls.

Nowhere in any of the above attacks, for instance, could I locate an engagement with the work of liberal writers or politicians of genuine merit and reputation. Not a single reference, in other words, to names like: Rorty, Walzer, Wills, Kuttner, Meyerson, Hertzberg, Rich, Krugman, Reich, Gitlin, Berman, Ivins, Green, Hoffmann, Gates, Kennedy (Edward, Randy, David and Paul), West, Judis, Kazin, Brinkley, Tomasky, Jackson, FitzGerald, Didion, Dyson, Power, Moyers, Frank, Pelosi, Feingold, McGovern (Jim and George), Wilentz, Fallows, McGrory, Navasky, vanden Heuvel, Kinsley, Scheer, Conason, Packer, Cohen, etc.

This is the patriotic left that Hitchens would have had to engage had he been serious about his critique of "America's liberals" in The Atlantic Monthly last year. It is their work that Kristof would have been duty-bound to examine rather than nutty websites. What has passed for analysis so far in this benighted genre is no more legitimate--or convincing--than those who would hold all conservatives responsible for the postings on freerepublic.com or lucianne.com, cheering the death of Paul Wellstone, his wife and daughter.


We've done our part. Here are reviews of books by a handful of Mr. Alterman's icons:
Posted by Orrin Judd at November 22, 2002 8:36 PM
Comments

Paul Kennedy is a liberal? Could have fooled me.

Posted by: Harry at November 23, 2002 12:53 PM

The point of Rise and Fall was to get us to give up the Cold War, which we were about to win.

Posted by: oj at November 23, 2002 2:53 PM

Yeah, but how is that a liberal program?

Posted by: Harry at November 23, 2002 10:13 PM

Allowing communism to remain in power in all of Eastern Europe and redirecting our budgets toward the welfare state at home? That is liberalism.

Posted by: oj at November 24, 2002 5:40 AM
« LAND O' GOSHEN: | Main | WHAT, COULD YE NOT WATCH WITH ME ONE HOUR?: »